Image

Far-Left Group Vowing to “Kill Musk’s Twitter” Tied to UK PM and US Democrats

"Responding to the whistleblower’s revelations, Elon Musk replied, 'This is war.'"

UK-based Centre for Countering Digital Hate (CCDH) is again facing serious legal action after revelations one of the group’s goals is to destroy X.

Explosive internal documents published on Substack show the activist non-profit group’s “annual priorities” included, “Kill Musk’s Twitter” alongside a focus on “advertising” and waging legislative lawfare.

Paul Thacker, working with Matt Taibbi (of Twitter Files fame) reproduced the whistleblower account, which potentially shows the CCDH messing with the 2024 US election.

According to CCDH agenda notes, “Kill Musk’s Twitter” was the ‘first item of business in the template,’ for every meeting from January through to June.

Of significance, Thacker unpacks CCDH’s direct connection to UK Labour, and the Democrats in the United States.

CCDH is effectively Labour Together, an organisation that has, as Politico reported in 2023, “close ties to the UK’s socialist Prime Minister, Kier Starmer, and the UK Labour Party.”

That direct connection comes by way of Morgan McSweeney, who in 2020, founded CCDH and Labour Together.

This was around the time Kier Starmer replaced far-left UK Labour leader, Jeremy Corbyn.

McSweeney, reportedly the man behind Starmer’s success – and the man who ‘purged’ UK Labour of Corbynites – is now Starmer’s chief of staff.

Adding to concerns red-flagged by CCDH’s ‘Kill Musk’s Twitter,’ McSweeney was part of a UK Labour contingent sent to the United States, in order to “help” the Democrats beat Donald Trump in November.

As The Washington Post noted, “Labour and Democrats may not be ideological soul mates, but they are broadly similar in many areas.”

Starmer sending in his stormtroopers is a clear indication UK Labour is helping manufacture a Harris win.

This all correlates with CCDH’s plot to take down X by undermining advertiser confidence, uncovered last year.

Those revelations remain part of a 23-page lawsuit between Musk, and the UK-based non-profit, whose stated existence is (ironically) to fight “hate.”

In that lawsuit, X contends that the Center for Countering Digital Hate Ltd is an “activist organization, masquerading as research agency.”

The CCDH, X alleges, have the support of legacy media, and are quietly funded “by unknown organizations, individuals and potentially even foreign governments.”

CCDH’s “conduct is nothing new,” the 2023 libel lawsuit argues.

They have “a history of using [contrived narratives] not for the goal of combating hate, but rather to censor a wide range of viewpoints on social media with which it disagrees.”

The CCDH dismissed the charges as “baseless.”

They then claimed, “X was trying to stifle free expression.”

Musk and X, were not the CCDH’s only target.

Robert F. Kennedy Jnr went into bat for Musk, arguing that the CCDH speech police, is a “foreign-funded dark money hate group that works with U.S. government agencies, to defame, and censor critics.”

This was because CCDH CEO, Imran Ahmed brazenly mocked RFK Jnr’s 2024 candidacy as a non-starter.

He has also smeared Kennedy as an “anti-vaxxer,” and implied that RFK’s only quality was his family’s name, as reflected in a BBC report. Read my full Caldron Pool recount here.

CCDH’s brazen plot to “Kill Musk’s Twitter” – in spite of the existing lawsuit – is arrogance personified.

The group doubling down on their war with X strongly suggests firm ties with those funding UK Labour, the Democrats, and Labour Together.

Considering themselves untouchable, isn’t just hubris, it also seems to confirm Paul Thacker’s argument about UK Labour interfering in the US election through its non-profit ‘speech police’ proxy.

Responding to the whistleblower’s revelations, Elon Musk replied, “This is war.”

To this he added,

CCDH is “violating US criminal statutes against foreign interference in elections.

“We are going after CCDH and their donors. AND their donors.”

Special Request:

For nearly eight years, we've highlighted issues ignored by mainstream media and resisted globalist ideologies eroding Western civilization. We've done this joyfully, without paywalls, despite personal costs to our team. Your support has kept us going, but operating costs exceed donations, forcing us to use ads. We’d love to ditch them, so we’re asking for your help. If you value our work, please consider supporting us via Stripe or PayPal. Every bit helps us keep fighting for our kids’ future. Thank you!

What's New?

Use the blue arrows at the bottom to scroll through the latest.
A Government That Won’t Acknowledge Christianity Can’t Defend the Nation

A Government That Won’t Acknowledge Christianity Can’t Defend the Nation

"By refusing to name its own moral foundations, the state undermines its ability to openly distinguish between belief systems that can coexist within its legal and moral order and those that fundamentally conflict with them. A society that cannot articulate its core moral commitments cannot coherently defend them."
By
by Staff WriterJan 16, 2026
Hate Speech Laws Are Just Blasphemy Laws

Hate Speech Laws Are Just Blasphemy Laws

"Blasphemy laws protect a society’s sacred object from verbal violation. Hate speech laws do the same, only the sacred object has changed. They are secularism’s answer to blasphemy law: enforcing reverence for the system’s ultimate values while denying that those values are religious at all."
By
by Staff WriterJan 15, 2026
Opposition Grows to Labor’s “Horrendous” Hate Speech Bill: “Worst Assault on Freedom Yet”

Opposition Grows to Labor’s “Horrendous” Hate Speech Bill: “Worst Assault on Freedom Yet”

Opposition to the federal government’s Combating Antisemitism, Hate and Extremism Bill 2026 is mounting across multiple parties, with MPs and senators warning that the rushed, broadly worded legislation threatens free speech, religious freedom and civil liberties while failing to address the causes of extremism.
By
by Staff WriterJan 15, 2026
Democrats Want Trump’s War Powers Limited Over a War With Venezuela That Doesn’t Exist

Democrats Want Trump’s War Powers Limited Over a War With Venezuela That Doesn’t Exist

“This Vote greatly hampers American self-defence and National Security, impeding the President’s Authority as Commander in Chief,” Trump wrote.
By
by Rod LampardJan 14, 2026
True Leaders Inspire Unity, Weak Men Legislate It

True Leaders Inspire Unity, Weak Men Legislate It

"Heavy-handed laws, by contrast, are a symptom of weakness—a last resort when authority has decayed, and coercion is all that remains."
By
by Staff WriterJan 13, 2026
Australians Sound Alarm Over New Draconian “Hate” Bill

Australians Sound Alarm Over New Draconian “Hate” Bill

"The Parliamentary Joint Committee on Intelligence and Security has allowed less than 48 hours for public submissions on the 144-page draft bill."
By
by Staff WriterJan 13, 2026
Hate Speech Laws Are an Admission of Government Failure

Hate Speech Laws Are an Admission of Government Failure

"Hate speech laws are evidence that our governments can no longer inspire loyalty, trust, or solidarity. They are an admission that policymakers have no unifying vision capable of bringing diverse people together voluntarily. So instead, they use force."
By
by Ben DavisJan 13, 2026
UK Leads Talks With Canada and Australia on Potential X Ban

UK Leads Talks With Canada and Australia on Potential X Ban

"Free communication has always posed a problem for those who seek to centralise authority. Open platforms like X allow claims to be challenged, narratives to be contested, and power to be scrutinised. That is precisely why they become targets when governments feel uncomfortable, embarrassed, or threatened."
By
by Staff WriterJan 12, 2026

Image

Support

If you value our work and would like to support us, you can do so by visiting our support page. Can’t find what you’re looking for? Visit our search page.

Copyright © 2025, Caldron Pool

Permissions

Everything published at Caldron Pool is protected by copyright and cannot be used and/or duplicated without prior written permission. Links and excerpts with full attribution are permitted. Published articles represent the opinions of the author and may not reflect the views of all contributors at Caldron Pool.

Caldron Pool does not condone the use of violence, threats, or intimidation for political or religious purposes. We strongly advocate for peaceful, respectful, and free communication and open debate without fear of reprisal or punishment.