Image

DeSantis Questioning U.S. Military Involvement in Ukraine Is Not a Refusal to Defend Freedom

"Drawing the U.S. into the conflict draws us closer to a hot war between the world’s two largest nuclear powers."

Foreign policy pundits are criticising Ron DeSantis for questioning further U.S. involvement in Putin’s war on Ukraine.

DeSantis described the war as territorial, declaring the conflict not vital to the national interest of the United States.

“Drawing the U.S. into the conflict draws us closer to a hot war between the world’s two largest nuclear powers,” he asserted.

Flat-out disagreeing with the D.C consensus, and some within his own party – such as GOP war fever cheerleader Lindsey Graham – Florida’s Republican governor drew the line at humanitarian aid, stating, “without question, peace should be the objective.”

“The U.S. should not provide assistance that could require the deployment of American troops or enable Ukraine to engage in offensive operations beyond its borders. F-16s and long-range missiles should therefore be off the table.”

“The risk of escalating the war,” he said, was “unacceptable.”

At the same time, DeSantis demanded transparency from Ukrainian president Volodymyr Zelensky, painting Biden’s funding of Ukraine’s defence as a “blank cheque, without any defined objectives or accountability.”

“U.S. citizens are entitled to know how the billions of U.S. taxpayer dollars are being utilized in Ukraine,” DeSantis stated.

He then addressed the Woke White House’s hypocrisy of funding the defence of Ukraine’s borders, while not caring about the southern border at home, arguing:

“We cannot prioritize intervention in an escalating foreign war over the defence of our own homeland, especially as tens of thousands of Americans are dying every year from narcotics smuggled across our open border.”

The comments were in response to a Fox News Ukraine questionnaire, later published online by Tucker Carlson.

Responding to DeSantis, Nikki Haley, Trump’s former UN Ambassador, turned potential GOP Presidential candidate, accused the 44-year-old of copycatting Trump.

Haley, in full “vote for me” mode, pitched, “Republicans deserve a choice, not an echo. America is far better off with a Ukrainian victory than a Russian one.”

Never Trump, Democrat-lite, Liz Cheney, went further, and labelled the popular governor’s stance on Ukraine, accountability, and war prevention, as “weak.”

Recounted by the NYPost, Cheney told the New York Times, “Surrendering to Putin, and refusing to defend freedom makes America less safe.”

Cheney’s cheap-shot isn’t just laughable. Her words have no real standing.

DeSantis was one of the only U.S. state leaders to ban vaccine mandates, not follow CCP-style lockdowns, and has led the way in protecting parental rights, despite attempts by the pseudo-religious LGBT fascist cult to cancel him (read more here).

More weight was given to the latter when DeSantis recently fired back at Joe Biden.

The current President proclaimed, opposing the trans-movement’s ideological genital mutilation of young people was “sinful.”

To which, DeSantis responded, “It is not ‘sinful'”‘ to prohibit the mutilation of minors. It is not acceptable for the federal government to mandate that procedures like sex change operations be allowed for kids.”

Trump also answered Tucker’s Ukraine questionnaire. He stated that opposing Russia in Ukraine was vital for Europe, not America.

“That’s why,” the former U.S. President said, “Europe should be paying far more than we are, or equal.”

“Our objective in Ukraine is to help and secure Europe, but Europe isn’t helping itself. They are relying on the United States to largely do it for them. That is very unfair to us.”

True to form, Trump said Putin wouldn’t have invaded if he was still president. He then landed some blame for Ukrainian suffering on, “a new lack of respect of the U.S.”

“Caused,” Trump argued, “at least partially, by our incompetently handled pull-out from Afghanistan.”

On Ukraine, he added, “The death and destruction MUST END NOW!”

“The President must meet with each side, then both sides together, and quickly work out a deal.”

Trump added, “This can be easily done if conducted by the right President. Both sides are weary and ready to make a deal. The meetings should start immediately.”

Read in the correct context, DeSantis and Trump’s caveat-fuelled answers could be considered a rebuke of Zelensky, who declared in February 2023:

 “The U.S. will have to send their sons and daughters exactly the same way as we are sending [our] sons and daughters to war.”

The khaki-clad Ukrainian president wants the U.S. to give the besieged state, F-16’s.

Zelensky’s implied (and somewhat manipulative) ultimatum: If Ukraine falls, the U.S. would have to fight a war anyway. Therefore, the U.S. either sends the ‘Fighting Falcons’ now, or they’ll have to send their sons, and daughters to do the fighting instead.

Twelve months since Putin’s tanks roared into Ukraine, both DeSantis and Trump see win-win negotiation, not more war, as the only solution.

Both leaders, in their own right, are expressing the concerns of millions over the billions of dollars in other people’s money being poured into Ukraine, without the proper scrutiny.

Both leaders understand the dangers of escalation.

They rightly hint that more war will only beget an even greater war.

Blessed are the peacemakers.

Special Request:

For nearly eight years, we've highlighted issues ignored by mainstream media and resisted globalist ideologies eroding Western civilization. We've done this joyfully, without paywalls, despite personal costs to our team. Your support has kept us going, but operating costs exceed donations, forcing us to use ads. We’d love to ditch them, so we’re asking for your help. If you value our work, please consider supporting us via Stripe or PayPal. Every bit helps us keep fighting for our kids’ future. Thank you!

What's New?

Use the blue arrows at the bottom to scroll through the latest.
16-Year-Old Explains Why the Social Media Ban Won’t Work

16-Year-Old Explains Why the Social Media Ban Won’t Work

"There are three very prominent concerns when it comes to how this law will actually work and the repercussions it could have."
By
by Selah CampisiDec 15, 2025
Bondi Massacre: A Wake-Up Call for Australia

Bondi Massacre: A Wake-Up Call for Australia

"Without honest discourse, decisive policy, and recognition that not all cultures can coexist harmoniously, such attacks are likely to recur—just look at Europe today."
By
by Staff WriterDec 15, 2025
White Guilt is Dead

White Guilt is Dead

"For decades, White guilt has been used as a tool of social control—silencing dissent, suppressing legitimate demographic concerns, and guilt-tripping Westerners into accepting policies that no other civilisation on earth would tolerate."
By
by Staff WriterDec 13, 2025
Brave New Families: How State Power Is Replacing Parental Responsibility

Brave New Families: How State Power Is Replacing Parental Responsibility

“All I see is the dystopian Brave New future that are projections of our simplistic mechanistic leaders, which makes sense, given their godfather is Karl Marx, a determinist who has bred many of his kind after his image.”
By
by Dr Stephen FysonDec 12, 2025
When the State Becomes Co-Parent: Australia’s Intrusion into Family Life

When the State Becomes Co-Parent: Australia’s Intrusion into Family Life

"As the state once absorbed the moral and spiritual leadership of the Church over society, so too can it absorb the moral and spiritual authority of parents over their children."
By
by Staff WriterDec 11, 2025
Tarantino Ranks ‘The Passion of the Christ’ Among the Best Films of the Century

Tarantino Ranks ‘The Passion of the Christ’ Among the Best Films of the Century

“I think it actually is one of the most brilliant visual storytelling films ever made,” he said.
By
by Rod LampardDec 11, 2025
Truth Tax: Senate Dissenters Reject Albo’s FOI Amendments as a “Hubris-Driven Attack on Transparency”

Truth Tax: Senate Dissenters Reject Albo’s FOI Amendments as a “Hubris-Driven Attack on Transparency”

"The consensus from dissenters seems to be that this bill further distances the Australian government from the people its representatives are elected to serve."
By
by Rod LampardDec 10, 2025
Speech Rejected, Promiscuity Approved

Speech Rejected, Promiscuity Approved

"The question arises, while Candace Owens' verbalising conservative values is not in our nation's interest, Lily Philips' sleeping around with Australian men is?"
By
by Selah CampisiDec 9, 2025

Image

Support

If you value our work and would like to support us, you can do so by visiting our support page. Can’t find what you’re looking for? Visit our search page.

Copyright © 2025, Caldron Pool

Permissions

Everything published at Caldron Pool is protected by copyright and cannot be used and/or duplicated without prior written permission. Links and excerpts with full attribution are permitted. Published articles represent the opinions of the author and may not reflect the views of all contributors at Caldron Pool.

Caldron Pool does not condone the use of violence, threats, or intimidation for political or religious purposes. We strongly advocate for peaceful, respectful, and free communication and open debate without fear of reprisal or punishment.