Image

Court rules against transgender activist who sued beauticians for refusing to wax his male genitals

A transgender activist who filed complaints against several female beauticians after they refused to wax his male genitals has lost his court case, according to a decision released on Tuesday. In 2018 Jonathan Yaniv, now known as Jessica, filed multiple complaints with the Human Rights Council in British Columbia accusing numerous estheticians of denying him service based on his gender identity. Yaniv also accused the women of “forcing their beliefs on society” by using their “religion and culture” to refuse service to “protected groups.” However, in a rare display of common sense, the BC Human Rights Tribunal ruled in favour……

A transgender activist who filed complaints against several female beauticians after they refused to wax his male genitals has lost his court case, according to a decision released on Tuesday.

In 2018 Jonathan Yaniv, now known as Jessica, filed multiple complaints with the Human Rights Council in British Columbia accusing numerous estheticians of denying him service based on his gender identity.

Yaniv also accused the women of “forcing their beliefs on society” by using their “religion and culture” to refuse service to “protected groups.”

However, in a rare display of common sense, the BC Human Rights Tribunal ruled in favour of the home esthetician’s right to refuse to handle male genitalia against their will.

The decision noted, “human rights legislation does not require a service provider to wax a type of genitals they are not trained for and have not consented to wax.”

The tribunal also found Yaniv had “filed complaints for improper purposes”, and described Yaniv’s testimony as “disingenuous and self-serving.”

Yaniv was also ordered to pay $2,000 to each of the three respondents for engaging in “improper conduct.” Which is still little compensation for those women who were forced out of business due to the ordeal.

Jay Cameron, the Justice Centre’s Litigation Manager praised the ruling, saying, “No woman should be compelled to touch male genitals against her will, irrespective of how the owner of the genitals identifies.”

In total, Yaniv has filed 15 complaints against various women, seeking as much as $15,000 in damages against each esthetician.

Special Request:

For nearly eight years, we've highlighted issues ignored by mainstream media and resisted globalist ideologies eroding Western civilization. We've done this joyfully, without paywalls, despite personal costs to our team. Your support has kept us going, but operating costs exceed donations, forcing us to use ads. We’d love to ditch them, so we’re asking for your help. If you value our work, please consider supporting us via Stripe or PayPal. Every bit helps us keep fighting for our kids’ future. Thank you!

What's New?

Use the blue arrows at the bottom to scroll through the latest.
So, Who Decides What Counts as Hate?

So, Who Decides What Counts as Hate?

You can't police what you can't coherently define.
By
by Ben DavisDec 18, 2025
Florida Designates the Muslim Brotherhood a Foreign Terrorist Organisation

Florida Designates the Muslim Brotherhood a Foreign Terrorist Organisation

“The order rightly calls out the Muslim Brotherhood’s subterfuge and ideology as ‘irreconcilable with foundational American principles of life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness.’”
By
by Rod LampardDec 18, 2025
Theology Has Public Consequences

Theology Has Public Consequences

"Theology does not remain private; it works itself out in culture, institutions, and public life."
By
by Staff WriterDec 17, 2025
Deeming Backs Smith After Pronoun Police Penalty: Refusing to Affirm a Lie Isn’t Dishonesty – It’s Courage!

Deeming Backs Smith After Pronoun Police Penalty: Refusing to Affirm a Lie Isn’t Dishonesty – It’s Courage!

“By supporting Kirralie, you’re really supporting every single Australian who wants to speak up in the future. This is especially so for women, because when one woman is punished for this, thousands of women are made silent.”
By
by Rod LampardDec 17, 2025
We Don’t Need Antisemitism Laws—We Need Anti-Australia Laws

We Don’t Need Antisemitism Laws—We Need Anti-Australia Laws

Australia does not need race-based antisemitism laws; it needs a pro-Australian legal framework that applies equally to all and punishes harmful conduct regardless of who commits it or who the victim is.
By
by Ben DavisDec 17, 2025
From “You Do You” to Leadership Coups: The Deadly Fruit of Post-Modernists in the Pulpit

From “You Do You” to Leadership Coups: The Deadly Fruit of Post-Modernists in the Pulpit

“Anyone who says that there are no truths, or that all truth is ‘merely relative,’ is asking you not to believe him. So don’t!”
By
by Rod LampardDec 16, 2025
Matt Walsh Slams Australian Government After Bondi Shooting

Matt Walsh Slams Australian Government After Bondi Shooting

"Rules are not enough. You also need to ensure that your country is full of people who are willing to follow those rules. And in that very important respect, Australia has clearly failed."
By
by Staff WriterDec 16, 2025
A Government Too Afraid to Name the Problem Can Never Fix It

A Government Too Afraid to Name the Problem Can Never Fix It

"Governments have become not only incapable but increasingly unwilling to acknowledge the simple and self-evident truth that some ideas are bad, and bad ideas inevitably produce bad behaviour."
By
by Ben DavisDec 16, 2025

Image

Support

If you value our work and would like to support us, you can do so by visiting our support page. Can’t find what you’re looking for? Visit our search page.

Copyright © 2025, Caldron Pool

Permissions

Everything published at Caldron Pool is protected by copyright and cannot be used and/or duplicated without prior written permission. Links and excerpts with full attribution are permitted. Published articles represent the opinions of the author and may not reflect the views of all contributors at Caldron Pool.

Caldron Pool does not condone the use of violence, threats, or intimidation for political or religious purposes. We strongly advocate for peaceful, respectful, and free communication and open debate without fear of reprisal or punishment.