Image

“Use Deadly Force”: Biden Green Lit FBI Raid to Go Nuclear on Trump at Mar-A-Lago

"The documents also imply Biden and his DOJ were ready to fight a Civil War."

Damning new court documents reveal Joe Biden green lighting the ‘use of deadly force’ in the FBI’s 2022 raid on Donald Trump’s Mar-a-Lago home in Florida.

The Watergate level of embarrassment blew up in the Woke White House’s face after the documents were posted online by journalist, Julie Kelly.

The documents also imply Biden and his DOJ were ready to fight a Civil War.

Agents were told to be “prepared to engage with FPOTUS and the USSS Security Team.”

A trauma centre was established, manned by a medic, had law enforcement agents encountered resistance.

Agents were additionally instructed to harass guests at the resort by knocking on every door to determine “occupation status.”

While some have defended the “use of deadly force” as a standard operating procedure, former service insiders, are saying, the approach is not normal.

“It was not a standard op,” Dan Bongino declared.

“The MAL raid was an unprecedented action with significant potential for confusion and blue on blue issues and conflict.

“Only a dumbass would pitch the ‘it’s the standard paperwork’ line,” he added.

Former CIA ops officer, Bryan Wright, concurred, stating, “Spoke to friends still at the Bureau. Not one thought it was wise or prudent to have authorization of deadly force during the MAL raid.”

“Said one: ‘We kill someone over documents at a US President’s house? Stupid. Unnecessary. Not normal.'”‘

Trump’s response on Truth Social was conveyed on X, by Federalist boss, Mollie Hemmingway.

In his reply, Trump called Joe Biden “crooked” (an accusation turned moniker), saying, “Now we know for sure, that Joe Biden is a serious threat to democracy. He is mentally unfit to hold office.”

He then cited a post-JFK amendment to the American constitution which allows the president to be replaced with the Vice president “in the event of death, removal, resignation, or incapacitation.”

Mocking the Biden administration’s heavy-handed overreaction, Mollie later remarked, “’It is standard policy to authorize shooting our Republican political opponent when we raid his home for no good reason after running the Russia collusion hoax and other scams.’ — Biden DOJ”

Biden going Defcon 1 on Donald Trump not only shows that ‘death to America’ DC Democrats are scrapping the bottom of the barrel, they’re desperate.

If not, also a hell of lot more paranoid about losing power than even DC’s hardest critics could have discerned.

They know Joe will need a repeat of the 2020 midnight election “miracle pause,” if he’s to see out another term in office.

Given global scrutiny, if they indeed did pull a fast one in 2020, and in 2021 on January 6 – as many believe they did – it’s unlikely the Democrats could do it again.

Joe Biden’s presidency is in tatters.

Despite his “build back better” sloganeering, America is still burning, and he’s helping it burn.

The current “president” isn’t just an embarrassment to the land of the free, his mishandling of high office is a blight on the home of the brave.

Either Biden was coached, or he’s as sinister as his 2022 “anyone not a Democrat is a domestic terrorist” speech suggested.

The left has a problem with bias when it comes to far-left extremism.

That bias is as big as the double standard they apply to domestic terrorism.

This bias goes all the way up to Biden’s Department of Justice, as a 2022 report revealed.

While they’re chasing windmills with imaginary swastikas, Nazism’s just as murderous, Marxist cousin, the hammer, and sickle, runs wild and free.

The Woke White House decision to up the ante by weaponizing the FBI against Trump, was, of course, to maximise the impact of its “Trump is a domestic terrorist” theatrics. (see here and here).

Like the J6 hoax, among the list of others, Joebama wanted maximum visual impact.

So, he sent law enforcement in with the order to go nuclear on the next potential president.

The follow-up question here is: could this FBI “whack” on Trump, have turned Mar-a-Lago into another Waco?

As Trump said, This whole saga reveals that Joe Biden & the Woke White House are the actual threats to Democracy.

The real oppressors are masquerading as the oppressed.

Special Request:

For nearly eight years, we've highlighted issues ignored by mainstream media and resisted globalist ideologies eroding Western civilization. We've done this joyfully, without paywalls, despite personal costs to our team. Your support has kept us going, but operating costs exceed donations, forcing us to use ads. We’d love to ditch them, so we’re asking for your help. If you value our work, please consider supporting us via Stripe or PayPal. Every bit helps us keep fighting for our kids’ future. Thank you!

What's New?

Use the blue arrows at the bottom to scroll through the latest.
So, Who Decides What Counts as Hate?

So, Who Decides What Counts as Hate?

You can't police what you can't coherently define.
By
by Ben DavisDec 18, 2025
Florida Designates the Muslim Brotherhood a Foreign Terrorist Organisation

Florida Designates the Muslim Brotherhood a Foreign Terrorist Organisation

“The order rightly calls out the Muslim Brotherhood’s subterfuge and ideology as ‘irreconcilable with foundational American principles of life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness.’”
By
by Rod LampardDec 18, 2025
Theology Has Public Consequences

Theology Has Public Consequences

"Theology does not remain private; it works itself out in culture, institutions, and public life."
By
by Staff WriterDec 17, 2025
Deeming Backs Smith After Pronoun Police Penalty: Refusing to Affirm a Lie Isn’t Dishonesty – It’s Courage!

Deeming Backs Smith After Pronoun Police Penalty: Refusing to Affirm a Lie Isn’t Dishonesty – It’s Courage!

“By supporting Kirralie, you’re really supporting every single Australian who wants to speak up in the future. This is especially so for women, because when one woman is punished for this, thousands of women are made silent.”
By
by Rod LampardDec 17, 2025
We Don’t Need Antisemitism Laws—We Need Anti-Australia Laws

We Don’t Need Antisemitism Laws—We Need Anti-Australia Laws

Australia does not need race-based antisemitism laws; it needs a pro-Australian legal framework that applies equally to all and punishes harmful conduct regardless of who commits it or who the victim is.
By
by Ben DavisDec 17, 2025
From “You Do You” to Leadership Coups: The Deadly Fruit of Post-Modernists in the Pulpit

From “You Do You” to Leadership Coups: The Deadly Fruit of Post-Modernists in the Pulpit

“Anyone who says that there are no truths, or that all truth is ‘merely relative,’ is asking you not to believe him. So don’t!”
By
by Rod LampardDec 16, 2025
Matt Walsh Slams Australian Government After Bondi Shooting

Matt Walsh Slams Australian Government After Bondi Shooting

"Rules are not enough. You also need to ensure that your country is full of people who are willing to follow those rules. And in that very important respect, Australia has clearly failed."
By
by Staff WriterDec 16, 2025
A Government Too Afraid to Name the Problem Can Never Fix It

A Government Too Afraid to Name the Problem Can Never Fix It

"Governments have become not only incapable but increasingly unwilling to acknowledge the simple and self-evident truth that some ideas are bad, and bad ideas inevitably produce bad behaviour."
By
by Ben DavisDec 16, 2025

Image

Support

If you value our work and would like to support us, you can do so by visiting our support page. Can’t find what you’re looking for? Visit our search page.

Copyright © 2025, Caldron Pool

Permissions

Everything published at Caldron Pool is protected by copyright and cannot be used and/or duplicated without prior written permission. Links and excerpts with full attribution are permitted. Published articles represent the opinions of the author and may not reflect the views of all contributors at Caldron Pool.

Caldron Pool does not condone the use of violence, threats, or intimidation for political or religious purposes. We strongly advocate for peaceful, respectful, and free communication and open debate without fear of reprisal or punishment.