Image

Idris Elba Accused of ‘Helping Racism’ After Ditching Identity Politics

“I don’t want to be the first Black. I’m the first Idris.”

Woke racists have accused Idris Elba of denying his “blackness” after stating he no longer describes himself as a black actor.

The British superstar told Esquire magazine the world needs to stop obsessing over skin colour, and superficial differences.

Pointing to the Woke microscope magnifying melanin over merit, Elba implied that the obsession with identity politics was holding people back.

“As humans, we are obsessed with race. And that obsession can really hinder people’s aspirations, hinder people’s growth,” he said.

“Racism is real,” and an important topic for discussion, he added, “but from my perspective, it’s only as powerful as you allow it to be.

 “I stopped describing myself as a Black actor when I realised it put me in a box.” 

The man who could still be the next James Bond – despite downplaying the possibility – stated, he became an actor out a love for acting, not activism.

“I didn’t become an actor because I didn’t see Black people doing it and I wanted to change that. I did it because I thought that’s a great profession and I could do a good job at it.”

The father of three then added, “As you get up the ladder, you get asked what it’s like to be the first Black to do this or that. Well, it’s the same as it would be if I were white. It’s the first time for me.’

“I don’t want to be the first Black. I’m the first Idris.”

His Esquire comments attracted an array of mixed responses.

Most supported the actor, while others walked on eggshells.

This group of critics seemed unwilling to venture too far into the “everything is racist” – “skin colour defines your character” – melanin minefield.

Elba’s biggest haters came from Americans with African ancestry.

The generation being fed on an unhealthy diet of victimhood vis a vis Critical Race [Hate] Theory, saw Elba’s comments as a betrayal of “blackness.”

Two critics went as far as to say, Brits with African heritage, were not true “Blacks,” inferring that “foreign blacks” were not woke enough.

Elba, they argued didn’t “understand the [systemic] sinister plot of white society” against the “black man,” nor how “blackness” tears down the walls of so-called institutionalised racism.

Reading from the same CRT narrative which views “whiteness” as sin, and “blackness” as incorruptible, American actor, John Boyega (Star Wars) called Ebla’s comments “very worrying.”

Boyega criticised Elba for “making weird adjustments” to avoid being put in a box, stating “We BLACK, and that’s that.”

Agreeing with the Star Wars actor’s rebuttal, Twitter uses tore into Elba accusing him of kowtowing to “white supremacism,” of “choosing to erase his identity” in order to get a job, right down to “not being black, but British with a dark tan.”

Another popular tweet called Elba’s comments “pretty damning.”

The critic then accused the actor of selling out to bigots, because he was “removing his racial distinction,” and working against “colour inclusivity.”

Responding to critics online, Elba wrote, “There isn’t a soul on this earth that can question whether I consider myself a BLACK MAN or not. Being an ‘actor’ is a profession, like being an ‘architect,’ they are not defined by race…”

While most of his critics seem to have missed the point, if you understand Critical Race [Hate] Theory’s end goal, it’s easy to understand heat.

His direct rebuttal of the New Left’s obsession with dividing people by race was, and is, a rebuttal of cultural Marxism.

Elba is rejecting the victimhood box, as much as he is rejecting the “us vs. them” cognitive distortion at the core of intersectional ideology.

Contra to criticism, Idris Elba wasn’t rejecting his identity. He was rejecting identity politics.

More importantly, the successful British actor was arguing to conserve viewing, and valuing people, on merit, not by their shade of melanin.

A viewpoint losing traction with today’s entitlement generations.

For all the good Elba rejecting Woketavism does, the 50-year-old British actor has raised eyebrows over his ties with the WEF.

He, and his wife, are also Climate Change catastrophisers, currently serving as UN Goodwill ambassadors.

Elba’s Esquire interview, which set fire to the Woke idols erected post-George Floyd, was in conjunction with promotions of his latest film Luther: The Fallen Sun.

Special Request:

For nearly eight years, we've highlighted issues ignored by mainstream media and resisted globalist ideologies eroding Western civilization. We've done this joyfully, without paywalls, despite personal costs to our team. Your support has kept us going, but operating costs exceed donations, forcing us to use ads. We’d love to ditch them, so we’re asking for your help. If you value our work, please consider supporting us via Stripe or PayPal. Every bit helps us keep fighting for our kids’ future. Thank you!

What's New?

Use the blue arrows at the bottom to scroll through the latest.
So, Who Decides What Counts as Hate?

So, Who Decides What Counts as Hate?

You can't police what you can't coherently define.
By
by Ben DavisDec 18, 2025
Florida Designates the Muslim Brotherhood a Foreign Terrorist Organisation

Florida Designates the Muslim Brotherhood a Foreign Terrorist Organisation

“The order rightly calls out the Muslim Brotherhood’s subterfuge and ideology as ‘irreconcilable with foundational American principles of life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness.’”
By
by Rod LampardDec 18, 2025
Theology Has Public Consequences

Theology Has Public Consequences

"Theology does not remain private; it works itself out in culture, institutions, and public life."
By
by Staff WriterDec 17, 2025
Deeming Backs Smith After Pronoun Police Penalty: Refusing to Affirm a Lie Isn’t Dishonesty – It’s Courage!

Deeming Backs Smith After Pronoun Police Penalty: Refusing to Affirm a Lie Isn’t Dishonesty – It’s Courage!

“By supporting Kirralie, you’re really supporting every single Australian who wants to speak up in the future. This is especially so for women, because when one woman is punished for this, thousands of women are made silent.”
By
by Rod LampardDec 17, 2025
We Don’t Need Antisemitism Laws—We Need Anti-Australia Laws

We Don’t Need Antisemitism Laws—We Need Anti-Australia Laws

Australia does not need race-based antisemitism laws; it needs a pro-Australian legal framework that applies equally to all and punishes harmful conduct regardless of who commits it or who the victim is.
By
by Ben DavisDec 17, 2025
From “You Do You” to Leadership Coups: The Deadly Fruit of Post-Modernists in the Pulpit

From “You Do You” to Leadership Coups: The Deadly Fruit of Post-Modernists in the Pulpit

“Anyone who says that there are no truths, or that all truth is ‘merely relative,’ is asking you not to believe him. So don’t!”
By
by Rod LampardDec 16, 2025
Matt Walsh Slams Australian Government After Bondi Shooting

Matt Walsh Slams Australian Government After Bondi Shooting

"Rules are not enough. You also need to ensure that your country is full of people who are willing to follow those rules. And in that very important respect, Australia has clearly failed."
By
by Staff WriterDec 16, 2025
A Government Too Afraid to Name the Problem Can Never Fix It

A Government Too Afraid to Name the Problem Can Never Fix It

"Governments have become not only incapable but increasingly unwilling to acknowledge the simple and self-evident truth that some ideas are bad, and bad ideas inevitably produce bad behaviour."
By
by Ben DavisDec 16, 2025

Image

Support

If you value our work and would like to support us, you can do so by visiting our support page. Can’t find what you’re looking for? Visit our search page.

Copyright © 2025, Caldron Pool

Permissions

Everything published at Caldron Pool is protected by copyright and cannot be used and/or duplicated without prior written permission. Links and excerpts with full attribution are permitted. Published articles represent the opinions of the author and may not reflect the views of all contributors at Caldron Pool.

Caldron Pool does not condone the use of violence, threats, or intimidation for political or religious purposes. We strongly advocate for peaceful, respectful, and free communication and open debate without fear of reprisal or punishment.