Image

Woke Gay ‘Pastor’ Says Jesus Repented Of His Racism After Using Racial Slur

Robertson's claims not only demonstrate the dangers of reading the Bible through the lens of Critical Race Theory, but they also show the importance of reading the Bible in context.

Jesus was a racist, according to a widely-viewed TikTok video by LGBT activist and ‘pastor,’ Brandan Robertson.

Robertson’s 60-second clip began circulating on social media this week after he claimed that Jesus had to repent of his racism for using a racial slur.

Appealing to an account in Mark 7:25-30, Robertson argued that Jesus initially refused to heal the daughter of a Syrophoenician woman because he had “prejudices and bias” towards other races.

Robertson said:

“Did you know that there’s a part of the Gospel of Mark where Jesus uses a racial slur?

In Mark chapter 7 there’s the account of the Syrophoenician woman. A woman who is Syrian and Greek, both of which there were strong biases against within the Jewish community.

And she comes to ask Jesus to heal her daughter who is possessed by a demon. And what is Jesus’ response? He says it’s not good for me to give the children’s food – meaning the children of Israel’s food – to dogs. He calls her a dog.

What’s amazing about this account is that the woman doesn’t back down. She speaks truth to power, she confronts Jesus and says, ‘Well you can think that about me but even dogs deserve the crumbs from the table.’


Her boldness and bravery to speak truth to power actually changes Jesus’ mind. Jesus repents of His racism and extends healing to this woman’s daughter.

I love this story because it’s a reminder that Jesus is human. He had prejudices and bias. And when confronted with it, He was willing to do His work. And this woman was willing to stand up and speak truth.”

Of course, Robertson is exactly wrong on almost every point. He has an agenda to advance and he’s evidently willing to distort the Bible to achieve that end.

So, what’s this account really about? In the story, Jesus was approached by the woman, a Gentile by birth, who “fell down at his feet” and “begged him to cast the demon out of her daughter.”

Jesus responded to the woman’s request, perhaps by testing her faith, with a saying that some scholars believe was likely a popular proverb at the time: “Let the children be fed first, for it is not right to take the children’s bread and throw it to the dogs.”

Despite Robertson’s claim, the word “dog” is not a racial slur. Rather, it’s a term used in the Bible to describe those that are outside of the Kingdom of God by employing the imagery of those outside of the family home.

Writing to Gentiles, that is non-Jews, Paul warns the Philippian church to “watch out for those dogs” (Phil. 3:2) who seek to undermine the Gospel. John employed similar imagery when he said, outside of the Kingdom “are the dogs, the sorcerers, the sexually immoral, the murderers,” and so on (Rev. 22:15).

In Mark’s account, the woman responded to Jesus, in a demonstration of faith, by saying: “Yes, Lord; yet even the dogs under the table eat the children’s crumbs.”

Jesus responds, “For this statement, you may go your way; the demon has left your daughter.” Mark then tells us that when the woman went home she found her child well.

These verses foreshadow the ministries of Jesus’ very own disciples, ministries that will bring in the Gentiles, those who currently live outside of the home, like a family pet.

Robertson’s claims not only demonstrate the dangers of reading the Bible through the lens of Critical Race Theory, but they also show the importance of reading the Bible in context.

So, no – Jesus didn’t repent of his racism, because he wasn’t a racist. In fact, Jesus never sinned. Now, you’d imagine a professing ‘pastor’ and ‘theologian’ could grasp one of the most fundamental aspects of the faith, but we should never underestimate the progressive’s ability to overlook their most obvious faults.

The Bible isn’t ambiguous or obscure when it comes to the sinlessness of Jesus. Not only is it impossible for God to contradict and deny himself (Heb. 6:18Tit. 1:22 Tim. 2:13Jam. 1:13), the sinlessness of Jesus is imperative to his coming.

The Apostle John tells us that “in the beginning was the Word, and the Word was with God, and the Word was God” (John 1:1). John goes on to say, “the Word became flesh and dwelt among us” (v.14). In other words, the Word that was God became a human being and lived on earth with other human beings.

But for what purpose? According to the Bible, the “Word became flesh” for a number of reasons, such as, to bring light to a dark world (Jn 12:46), to bear witness to the truth (Jn. 18:37), and to serve (Mk 10:45). But he also came to accomplish what no other human being could accomplish. Namely, to give eternal life to his people by overcoming sin and defeating death.

Jesus achieved this by offering himself as a substitute for sinners, something he couldn’t do if he was a sinner himself. On earth, Jesus lived a life of perfect obedience to God, from birth until his death. He lived the life that we’ve all failed to live. He then died the death that we all deserve to die.

The author of Hebrews tells us that Jesus came to earth “to put away sin by the sacrifice of himself” (Heb. 9:26). There was a great exchange. He dealt with our sins on the cross so that he could clothe us in his own righteousness (Isa. 61:10-11). The proof of that being accomplished was his resurrection. Death was undone.

Why was all this necessary? Because even the “righteous” things we do are tainted and marred by sin. As the prophet Isaiah said, “We have all become like one who is unclean, and all our righteous deeds are like a polluted garment” (Isa. 64:6). None qualify to enter God’s presence without melting away like wax before a flame (Ps. 68:1). So, what hope do we have for dwelling on his new earth in his kingdom forever?

Furthermore, lest any of us are still banking on our own goodness, Jesus warned that “unless your righteousness exceeds that of the scribes and Pharisees, you will never enter the kingdom of heaven” (Matt. 5:20).

For us, this is an unachievable standard. So, you better hope you have the right Jesus, the sinless Jesus of the Bible, and not a fictitious invention created in the image of your own woke ideology.

Otherwise, as Jesus said, “you will never enter the kingdom.” And in the end, you won’t be eating at the table with the children, you’ll be outside the family home, like a dog. And that’s a warning that Robertson would do well to heed.

Special Request:

For nearly eight years, we've highlighted issues ignored by mainstream media and resisted globalist ideologies eroding Western civilization. We've done this joyfully, without paywalls, despite personal costs to our team. Your support has kept us going, but operating costs exceed donations, forcing us to use ads. We’d love to ditch them, so we’re asking for your help. If you value our work, please consider supporting us via Stripe or PayPal. Every bit helps us keep fighting for our kids’ future. Thank you!

What's New?

Use the blue arrows at the bottom to scroll through the latest.
So, Who Decides What Counts as Hate?

So, Who Decides What Counts as Hate?

You can't police what you can't coherently define.
By
by Ben DavisDec 18, 2025
Florida Designates the Muslim Brotherhood a Foreign Terrorist Organisation

Florida Designates the Muslim Brotherhood a Foreign Terrorist Organisation

“The order rightly calls out the Muslim Brotherhood’s subterfuge and ideology as ‘irreconcilable with foundational American principles of life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness.’”
By
by Rod LampardDec 18, 2025
Theology Has Public Consequences

Theology Has Public Consequences

"Theology does not remain private; it works itself out in culture, institutions, and public life."
By
by Staff WriterDec 17, 2025
Deeming Backs Smith After Pronoun Police Penalty: Refusing to Affirm a Lie Isn’t Dishonesty – It’s Courage!

Deeming Backs Smith After Pronoun Police Penalty: Refusing to Affirm a Lie Isn’t Dishonesty – It’s Courage!

“By supporting Kirralie, you’re really supporting every single Australian who wants to speak up in the future. This is especially so for women, because when one woman is punished for this, thousands of women are made silent.”
By
by Rod LampardDec 17, 2025
We Don’t Need Antisemitism Laws—We Need Anti-Australia Laws

We Don’t Need Antisemitism Laws—We Need Anti-Australia Laws

Australia does not need race-based antisemitism laws; it needs a pro-Australian legal framework that applies equally to all and punishes harmful conduct regardless of who commits it or who the victim is.
By
by Ben DavisDec 17, 2025
From “You Do You” to Leadership Coups: The Deadly Fruit of Post-Modernists in the Pulpit

From “You Do You” to Leadership Coups: The Deadly Fruit of Post-Modernists in the Pulpit

“Anyone who says that there are no truths, or that all truth is ‘merely relative,’ is asking you not to believe him. So don’t!”
By
by Rod LampardDec 16, 2025
Matt Walsh Slams Australian Government After Bondi Shooting

Matt Walsh Slams Australian Government After Bondi Shooting

"Rules are not enough. You also need to ensure that your country is full of people who are willing to follow those rules. And in that very important respect, Australia has clearly failed."
By
by Staff WriterDec 16, 2025
A Government Too Afraid to Name the Problem Can Never Fix It

A Government Too Afraid to Name the Problem Can Never Fix It

"Governments have become not only incapable but increasingly unwilling to acknowledge the simple and self-evident truth that some ideas are bad, and bad ideas inevitably produce bad behaviour."
By
by Ben DavisDec 16, 2025

Image

Support

If you value our work and would like to support us, you can do so by visiting our support page. Can’t find what you’re looking for? Visit our search page.

Copyright © 2025, Caldron Pool

Permissions

Everything published at Caldron Pool is protected by copyright and cannot be used and/or duplicated without prior written permission. Links and excerpts with full attribution are permitted. Published articles represent the opinions of the author and may not reflect the views of all contributors at Caldron Pool.

Caldron Pool does not condone the use of violence, threats, or intimidation for political or religious purposes. We strongly advocate for peaceful, respectful, and free communication and open debate without fear of reprisal or punishment.