Image

Djokovic Granted Vaccine Exemption As Australians Lose Their Careers to Strict “No Jab, No Job” Mandates

"We're losing good nurses, doctors, police officers, firefighters, aged care workers, and more. But this is where exemptions are offered? Tennis?"

Novak Djokovic has revealed he will be defending his Australian Open title at Melbourne Park this month after receiving a COVID-19 vaccine exemption.

The decision comes after the state government of Victoria ruled that all players and other participants in the Australian Open, which states on January 17, must be fully vaccinated.

“I’ve spent fantastic quality time with my loved ones over the break and today I’m heading Down Under with an exemption permission,” the 34-year-old Serbian player said in a post on social media.

A statement issued late on Tuesday night by the Australian Open confirmed Djokovic had received a medical exemption after “a rigorous review process involving two separate independent panels of medical experts.”

“One of those was the Independent Medical Exemption Review Panel appointed by the Victorian Department of Health. They assessed all applications to see if they met the Australian Technical Advisory Group on Immunisation (ATAGI) guidelines,” the statement read.

The Victorian government said it had worked closely with Tennis Australia on establishing an “independent and rigorous process to assess requests for medical exemptions at the Australian Open.”

“Any player who is granted a medical exemption will have gone through a two-stage, independent process to verify they had a genuine medical condition that meets the criteria for an exemption.”

Djokovic had previously refused to reveal his vaccination status, prompting speculation that he would either have to pull out of the competition or obtain an exemption to play.

“Personally, I am not pro-vaccines,” Djokovic said back in April 2020.

“I would not like it for someone to compel me to be vaccinated so I can travel. But if it becomes compulsory, what will happen? I will have to make a decision.”

Of course, the exemption has upset people on all sides of the debate.

The pro-vaxxed and paranoid are warning that “unvaccinated” Novak poses a serious threat to the nation, even though, apparently, more than 90% of Australians aged 16 and over are now fully vaccinated against that supposed threat.

On the other side, those opposed to vaccine mandates have noted the countless Australians who have lost their income and had their careers abruptly ended by strict and unforgiving “no jab, no job” policies.

“Another Covid decision on political, not medical grounds,” tweeted Queensland One Nation Senator Malcolm Roberts.

“Admire his tennis ability and courage in standing up for his rights,” Roberts said. “Detest Andrews Victorian government’s inhumane mandates and coercion on Australians. Why flog Aussies?”

An Australian health worker who lost her employment due to the mandates told Caldron Pool: “I’m happy for anyone who manages to get an exemption to these draconian rules.”

“I’m happy Djokovic will get to play. But I can’t help but wonder if he were anyone else, if he were in any other career, would our current overlords treat him the same way? I’ve had friends who’ve been told, not even severe adverse reactions to the first jab are enough to warrant an exemption to the second.

“We’re losing good nurses, doctors, police officers, firefighters, aged care workers, and more. But this is where exemptions are offered? Tennis?”

The Australian Open is two weeks away, but no doubt as tempers continue to flare, the lobbing will begin much earlier, and of the kind pictured below:

Special Request:

For nearly eight years, we've highlighted issues ignored by mainstream media and resisted globalist ideologies eroding Western civilization. We've done this joyfully, without paywalls, despite personal costs to our team. Your support has kept us going, but operating costs exceed donations, forcing us to use ads. We’d love to ditch them, so we’re asking for your help. If you value our work, please consider supporting us via Stripe or PayPal. Every bit helps us keep fighting for our kids’ future. Thank you!

What's New?

Use the blue arrows at the bottom to scroll through the latest.
16-Year-Old Explains Why the Social Media Ban Won’t Work

16-Year-Old Explains Why the Social Media Ban Won’t Work

"There are three very prominent concerns when it comes to how this law will actually work and the repercussions it could have."
By
by Selah CampisiDec 15, 2025
Bondi Massacre: A Wake-Up Call for Australia

Bondi Massacre: A Wake-Up Call for Australia

"Without honest discourse, decisive policy, and recognition that not all cultures can coexist harmoniously, such attacks are likely to recur—just look at Europe today."
By
by Staff WriterDec 15, 2025
White Guilt is Dead

White Guilt is Dead

"For decades, White guilt has been used as a tool of social control—silencing dissent, suppressing legitimate demographic concerns, and guilt-tripping Westerners into accepting policies that no other civilisation on earth would tolerate."
By
by Staff WriterDec 13, 2025
Brave New Families: How State Power Is Replacing Parental Responsibility

Brave New Families: How State Power Is Replacing Parental Responsibility

“All I see is the dystopian Brave New future that are projections of our simplistic mechanistic leaders, which makes sense, given their godfather is Karl Marx, a determinist who has bred many of his kind after his image.”
By
by Dr Stephen FysonDec 12, 2025
When the State Becomes Co-Parent: Australia’s Intrusion into Family Life

When the State Becomes Co-Parent: Australia’s Intrusion into Family Life

"As the state once absorbed the moral and spiritual leadership of the Church over society, so too can it absorb the moral and spiritual authority of parents over their children."
By
by Staff WriterDec 11, 2025
Tarantino Ranks ‘The Passion of the Christ’ Among the Best Films of the Century

Tarantino Ranks ‘The Passion of the Christ’ Among the Best Films of the Century

“I think it actually is one of the most brilliant visual storytelling films ever made,” he said.
By
by Rod LampardDec 11, 2025
Truth Tax: Senate Dissenters Reject Albo’s FOI Amendments as a “Hubris-Driven Attack on Transparency”

Truth Tax: Senate Dissenters Reject Albo’s FOI Amendments as a “Hubris-Driven Attack on Transparency”

"The consensus from dissenters seems to be that this bill further distances the Australian government from the people its representatives are elected to serve."
By
by Rod LampardDec 10, 2025
Speech Rejected, Promiscuity Approved

Speech Rejected, Promiscuity Approved

"The question arises, while Candace Owens' verbalising conservative values is not in our nation's interest, Lily Philips' sleeping around with Australian men is?"
By
by Selah CampisiDec 9, 2025

Image

Support

If you value our work and would like to support us, you can do so by visiting our support page. Can’t find what you’re looking for? Visit our search page.

Copyright © 2025, Caldron Pool

Permissions

Everything published at Caldron Pool is protected by copyright and cannot be used and/or duplicated without prior written permission. Links and excerpts with full attribution are permitted. Published articles represent the opinions of the author and may not reflect the views of all contributors at Caldron Pool.

Caldron Pool does not condone the use of violence, threats, or intimidation for political or religious purposes. We strongly advocate for peaceful, respectful, and free communication and open debate without fear of reprisal or punishment.