Image

William Shatner Says Gene Roddenberry Would Hate Woke Star Trek

"...he’d be turning in his grave at some of this stuff."

The 91-years-young star of the original Star Trek series has criticised newer additions (see here, here and here) to the sci-fi universe, declaring, Star Trek creator Gene Roddenberry, would be “turning in his grave.”

Shatner made the comments at this year’s Comic-Con International held in San Deigo over the weekend.

The Hollywood Reporter recalled how the actor – whose Hollywood C.V. includes decades of work in TV and cinema – closed out the first night’ of the pop-culture conference, telling Trekkies:

“I got to know Gene Roddenberry in three years fairly well, he’d be turning in his grave at some of this stuff.”

When Shatner was asked if the new arrivals beat the original series, he answered, “none of them.”

Although not specified in reports, the basis for Shatner’s criticism is both political and artistic.

The actor has long been an opponent of wokeism, ripping into cancel culture’s rewriting of the past (deconstructionism), and its erasure of history, such as the mass destruction of historical monuments.

In one 2019 example, Shatner wrote: “[Wokeism] got adopted and reworked to be the joke it is today. To be woke is to be uniformed which is exactly the opposite of what it stands for.”

In an example from 2021, after climate change catastrophisers took issue with his Blue Origin trip into space, Shatner fired back:

“What about the Android phone you are tweeting on, Sporto? I’m sure that the manufacturing of that was Carbon negative. The moronic ridiculousness of the woke set who go to extremes to condemn others while sitting in Carbon squalor is hysterical.”

There’s a lot more. When feuding fellow Trek cast member, George Takei, jumped on that bandwagon by calling Shatner an ‘unfit Guinea pig, boldly going where other people have gone before,’ Shatner retorted:

“Don’t hate George. The only time he gets press is when he talks bad about me. He claims 50+ years ago I took away a camera angle that denied him 30 more seconds of prime-time TV. I’m giving it back to him now by letting him spew his hatred for the world to see!”

Shatner’s criticisms are also linked to creative direction.

Comments about Roddenberry from Next Generation’s Jonathon Frakes (Commander Will Riker) appear to lend more context to Shatner’s criticisms.

When discussing Frake’s role in directing an emotionally intense episode of Amazon’s Star Trek: Picard, the Next Gen star said, “We never could have done [a scene like] this on our show.”

The reason, according to The Hollywood Reporter, is Roddenberry’s Star Trek lore. He wanted no dark drama between the crew of NCC-1701 (The USS Enterprise).

This is presumably because The Enterprise’s mission was to solve dysfunction in the Universe, not enable it.

Apart from being a main event, Shatner used his presence at this year’s Comic-Con to promote his up-and-coming, untitled, Legion M documentary. He then participated in the handprint ceremony, “immortalising” him in cement.

Then, as if the Star Trek Captain couldn’t get any more impressive in real life, there’s the bit where Shatner clashed with Comic-Con’s “strict” COVID-19 mask mandate.

The Hollywood Reporter recounted how Shatner commanded a fan to remove his mask ‘several times’, in order to hear the fan more clearly.

Shatner argued, “Not only did I not understand what he’s talking about, but I don’t understand who he’s talking to!”

Contrary to Woketocracy apologists, Star Trek’s woke trajectory is not an extension of Gene Roddenberry’s boundary-challenging narratives and characters.

At its core, Roddenberry’s Star Trek maintained the concept of family, faith, and freedom. His world is a far cry from the “woke” alienation of healthy traditions, and the “burn it all down” social justice warriorism of deconstructionism.

Even the most “progressive” Trekkie would have to admit that the moral fabric of Star Trek lore involves the balance between emotion and reason.

It is a world firmly planted in respect for science, faith, life, and facts over feelings, fanaticism, and death.

Special Request:

For nearly eight years, we've highlighted issues ignored by mainstream media and resisted globalist ideologies eroding Western civilization. We've done this joyfully, without paywalls, despite personal costs to our team. Your support has kept us going, but operating costs exceed donations, forcing us to use ads. We’d love to ditch them, so we’re asking for your help. If you value our work, please consider supporting us via Stripe or PayPal. Every bit helps us keep fighting for our kids’ future. Thank you!

What's New?

Use the blue arrows at the bottom to scroll through the latest.
So, Who Decides What Counts as Hate?

So, Who Decides What Counts as Hate?

You can't police what you can't coherently define.
By
by Ben DavisDec 18, 2025
Florida Designates the Muslim Brotherhood a Foreign Terrorist Organisation

Florida Designates the Muslim Brotherhood a Foreign Terrorist Organisation

“The order rightly calls out the Muslim Brotherhood’s subterfuge and ideology as ‘irreconcilable with foundational American principles of life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness.’”
By
by Rod LampardDec 18, 2025
Theology Has Public Consequences

Theology Has Public Consequences

"Theology does not remain private; it works itself out in culture, institutions, and public life."
By
by Staff WriterDec 17, 2025
Deeming Backs Smith After Pronoun Police Penalty: Refusing to Affirm a Lie Isn’t Dishonesty – It’s Courage!

Deeming Backs Smith After Pronoun Police Penalty: Refusing to Affirm a Lie Isn’t Dishonesty – It’s Courage!

“By supporting Kirralie, you’re really supporting every single Australian who wants to speak up in the future. This is especially so for women, because when one woman is punished for this, thousands of women are made silent.”
By
by Rod LampardDec 17, 2025
We Don’t Need Antisemitism Laws—We Need Anti-Australia Laws

We Don’t Need Antisemitism Laws—We Need Anti-Australia Laws

Australia does not need race-based antisemitism laws; it needs a pro-Australian legal framework that applies equally to all and punishes harmful conduct regardless of who commits it or who the victim is.
By
by Ben DavisDec 17, 2025
From “You Do You” to Leadership Coups: The Deadly Fruit of Post-Modernists in the Pulpit

From “You Do You” to Leadership Coups: The Deadly Fruit of Post-Modernists in the Pulpit

“Anyone who says that there are no truths, or that all truth is ‘merely relative,’ is asking you not to believe him. So don’t!”
By
by Rod LampardDec 16, 2025
Matt Walsh Slams Australian Government After Bondi Shooting

Matt Walsh Slams Australian Government After Bondi Shooting

"Rules are not enough. You also need to ensure that your country is full of people who are willing to follow those rules. And in that very important respect, Australia has clearly failed."
By
by Staff WriterDec 16, 2025
A Government Too Afraid to Name the Problem Can Never Fix It

A Government Too Afraid to Name the Problem Can Never Fix It

"Governments have become not only incapable but increasingly unwilling to acknowledge the simple and self-evident truth that some ideas are bad, and bad ideas inevitably produce bad behaviour."
By
by Ben DavisDec 16, 2025

Image

Support

If you value our work and would like to support us, you can do so by visiting our support page. Can’t find what you’re looking for? Visit our search page.

Copyright © 2025, Caldron Pool

Permissions

Everything published at Caldron Pool is protected by copyright and cannot be used and/or duplicated without prior written permission. Links and excerpts with full attribution are permitted. Published articles represent the opinions of the author and may not reflect the views of all contributors at Caldron Pool.

Caldron Pool does not condone the use of violence, threats, or intimidation for political or religious purposes. We strongly advocate for peaceful, respectful, and free communication and open debate without fear of reprisal or punishment.