Image

When Words Are Worse Than Murder

"By condemning Kirk and excusing his killer, the Left has effectively said: words are worse than murder."

Hypothetically, let’s grant the Left its deranged premise: Charlie Kirk was an “extremist,” and his assassination is not something to be mourned. Even if that were true, one obvious question remains: what about his assassin? Are his violent actions, at the very least, to be equally condemned?

If Kirk’s words were “hateful,” what of the man who picked up a rifle and shot him dead? Was his action also “hateful”? By any reasonable standard, the murderer is more of an extremist.

Yet the silence from the Left about the shooter is deafening. Instead of condemning the murderer, they reserve their fury for his victim.

In their response, they revealed their distorted hierarchy of evils: Charlie’s words were worse than his killer’s bullets. Dialogue, debate, and dissenting speech are treated as more dangerous than assassination.

Think about what that means. It is a tacit admission that eliminating political opponents through violence is permissible, so long as the target is someone they hate.

This is not a small error in judgment—it’s a reordering of civilization’s most basic moral truths. Societies survive on the assumption that disputes can be settled with words rather than weapons.

Once speech is branded as more dangerous than bullets, the path is cleared for violence to become the default tool of politics.

Charlie Kirk was, in fact, a good man. But even if you accept the Left’s caricature of him, their silence, when it comes to his assassin, is revealing.

By condemning Kirk and excusing his killer, the Left has effectively said: words are worse than murder. Talk is worse than terrorism. Dialogue is more dangerous than a deranged man with a gun.

If the words of a political opponent are more intolerable than the act of assassination, then what remains but to cheer the shooter? It is the logic of tyranny, where dissent is not debated but destroyed.

And that is the dark truth revealed in the Left’s response: the assassin was not condemned because, in their inverted moral calculus, he committed the lesser offence. For many, words are worse than murder.

That should terrify everyone.

Special Request:

For nearly eight years, we've highlighted issues ignored by mainstream media and resisted globalist ideologies eroding Western civilization. We've done this joyfully, without paywalls, despite personal costs to our team. Your support has kept us going, but operating costs exceed donations, forcing us to use ads. We’d love to ditch them, so we’re asking for your help. If you value our work, please consider supporting us via Stripe or PayPal. Every bit helps us keep fighting for our kids’ future. Thank you!

What's New?

Use the blue arrows at the bottom to scroll through the latest.
16-Year-Old Explains Why the Social Media Ban Won’t Work

16-Year-Old Explains Why the Social Media Ban Won’t Work

"There are three very prominent concerns when it comes to how this law will actually work and the repercussions it could have."
By
by Selah CampisiDec 15, 2025
Bondi Massacre: A Wake-Up Call for Australia

Bondi Massacre: A Wake-Up Call for Australia

"Without honest discourse, decisive policy, and recognition that not all cultures can coexist harmoniously, such attacks are likely to recur—just look at Europe today."
By
by Staff WriterDec 15, 2025
White Guilt is Dead

White Guilt is Dead

"For decades, White guilt has been used as a tool of social control—silencing dissent, suppressing legitimate demographic concerns, and guilt-tripping Westerners into accepting policies that no other civilisation on earth would tolerate."
By
by Staff WriterDec 13, 2025
Brave New Families: How State Power Is Replacing Parental Responsibility

Brave New Families: How State Power Is Replacing Parental Responsibility

“All I see is the dystopian Brave New future that are projections of our simplistic mechanistic leaders, which makes sense, given their godfather is Karl Marx, a determinist who has bred many of his kind after his image.”
By
by Dr Stephen FysonDec 12, 2025
When the State Becomes Co-Parent: Australia’s Intrusion into Family Life

When the State Becomes Co-Parent: Australia’s Intrusion into Family Life

"As the state once absorbed the moral and spiritual leadership of the Church over society, so too can it absorb the moral and spiritual authority of parents over their children."
By
by Staff WriterDec 11, 2025
Tarantino Ranks ‘The Passion of the Christ’ Among the Best Films of the Century

Tarantino Ranks ‘The Passion of the Christ’ Among the Best Films of the Century

“I think it actually is one of the most brilliant visual storytelling films ever made,” he said.
By
by Rod LampardDec 11, 2025
Truth Tax: Senate Dissenters Reject Albo’s FOI Amendments as a “Hubris-Driven Attack on Transparency”

Truth Tax: Senate Dissenters Reject Albo’s FOI Amendments as a “Hubris-Driven Attack on Transparency”

"The consensus from dissenters seems to be that this bill further distances the Australian government from the people its representatives are elected to serve."
By
by Rod LampardDec 10, 2025
Speech Rejected, Promiscuity Approved

Speech Rejected, Promiscuity Approved

"The question arises, while Candace Owens' verbalising conservative values is not in our nation's interest, Lily Philips' sleeping around with Australian men is?"
By
by Selah CampisiDec 9, 2025

Image

Support

If you value our work and would like to support us, you can do so by visiting our support page. Can’t find what you’re looking for? Visit our search page.

Copyright © 2025, Caldron Pool

Permissions

Everything published at Caldron Pool is protected by copyright and cannot be used and/or duplicated without prior written permission. Links and excerpts with full attribution are permitted. Published articles represent the opinions of the author and may not reflect the views of all contributors at Caldron Pool.

Caldron Pool does not condone the use of violence, threats, or intimidation for political or religious purposes. We strongly advocate for peaceful, respectful, and free communication and open debate without fear of reprisal or punishment.