Image

When Words Are Worse Than Murder

"By condemning Kirk and excusing his killer, the Left has effectively said: words are worse than murder."

Hypothetically, let’s grant the Left its deranged premise: Charlie Kirk was an “extremist,” and his assassination is not something to be mourned. Even if that were true, one obvious question remains: what about his assassin? Are his violent actions, at the very least, to be equally condemned?

If Kirk’s words were “hateful,” what of the man who picked up a rifle and shot him dead? Was his action also “hateful”? By any reasonable standard, the murderer is more of an extremist.

Yet the silence from the Left about the shooter is deafening. Instead of condemning the murderer, they reserve their fury for his victim.

In their response, they revealed their distorted hierarchy of evils: Charlie’s words were worse than his killer’s bullets. Dialogue, debate, and dissenting speech are treated as more dangerous than assassination.

Think about what that means. It is a tacit admission that eliminating political opponents through violence is permissible, so long as the target is someone they hate.

This is not a small error in judgment—it’s a reordering of civilization’s most basic moral truths. Societies survive on the assumption that disputes can be settled with words rather than weapons.

Once speech is branded as more dangerous than bullets, the path is cleared for violence to become the default tool of politics.

Charlie Kirk was, in fact, a good man. But even if you accept the Left’s caricature of him, their silence, when it comes to his assassin, is revealing.

By condemning Kirk and excusing his killer, the Left has effectively said: words are worse than murder. Talk is worse than terrorism. Dialogue is more dangerous than a deranged man with a gun.

If the words of a political opponent are more intolerable than the act of assassination, then what remains but to cheer the shooter? It is the logic of tyranny, where dissent is not debated but destroyed.

And that is the dark truth revealed in the Left’s response: the assassin was not condemned because, in their inverted moral calculus, he committed the lesser offence. For many, words are worse than murder.

That should terrify everyone.

Special Request:

For nearly eight years, we've highlighted issues ignored by mainstream media and resisted globalist ideologies eroding Western civilization. We've done this joyfully, without paywalls, despite personal costs to our team. Your support has kept us going, but operating costs exceed donations, forcing us to use ads. We’d love to ditch them, so we’re asking for your help. If you value our work, please consider supporting us via Stripe or PayPal. Every bit helps us keep fighting for our kids’ future. Thank you!

What's New?

Use the blue arrows at the bottom to scroll through the latest.
Social Media Bans for Under-16s: Helpful Reform or Misplaced Hope?

Social Media Bans for Under-16s: Helpful Reform or Misplaced Hope?

Will banning social media accounts for under-16s meaningfully improve the wellbeing of young people?
By
by Dr Stephen FysonFeb 3, 2026
Petra Rocks Back to Life: Legendary Band Drops ‘Hope’ After 20 Year Studio Hiatus

Petra Rocks Back to Life: Legendary Band Drops ‘Hope’ After 20 Year Studio Hiatus

"After signing off in an era-ending 2005 farewell, the band just surprised the world with ‘Hope.’"
By
by Rod LampardFeb 2, 2026
Christianity Endured Decades of Hate Without Hate Speech Protections, And There’s a Reason Why

Christianity Endured Decades of Hate Without Hate Speech Protections, And There’s a Reason Why

“The only ideas that demand the sword of the state for protection are those that cannot stand on their own, those that crumble under scrutiny, criticism, or challenge.”
By
by Staff WriterFeb 2, 2026
Evolution is Dead, But Its Corpse Will Hang Around A While

Evolution is Dead, But Its Corpse Will Hang Around A While

“Genetics has now demonstrated that the mechanisms that have been proposed to drive evolution by natural selection cannot have possibly done so.”
By
by Matthew LittlefieldJan 31, 2026
Spain Grants Legal Status to Half a Million Migrants to “Fight the Far-Right”

Spain Grants Legal Status to Half a Million Migrants to “Fight the Far-Right”

"By framing the mass introduction of migrants as an instrument to counter political opponents, authorities have confirmed a suspicion long held by many across the Western world: that large-scale population movements are not treated as a humanitarian necessity, but as a political weapon against Nationalism."
By
by Staff WriterJan 30, 2026
Why Voters Are Abandoning the Liberals for One Nation

Why Voters Are Abandoning the Liberals for One Nation

“Australians aren't looking for a softer political version of what they're already suffering under. They are looking for an alternative.”
By
by Staff WriterJan 30, 2026
First the Imams, Then the Pastors

First the Imams, Then the Pastors

"Without formally recognising Christianity, accrediting imams today easily becomes accrediting pastors tomorrow. From there, it is a small step to state-sanctioned sermons, state-issued Bibles, state-regulated songs, and state-approved prayers."
By
by Staff WriterJan 29, 2026
The Evangelical Retreat: How Protestant Piety Became Cowardice

The Evangelical Retreat: How Protestant Piety Became Cowardice

"This is the spiritual problem of our age: We have a church that fears crucifixion more than compromise."
By
by Staff WriterJan 28, 2026

Image

Support

If you value our work and would like to support us, you can do so by visiting our support page. Can’t find what you’re looking for? Visit our search page.

Copyright © 2025, Caldron Pool

Permissions

Everything published at Caldron Pool is protected by copyright and cannot be used and/or duplicated without prior written permission. Links and excerpts with full attribution are permitted. Published articles represent the opinions of the author and may not reflect the views of all contributors at Caldron Pool.

Caldron Pool does not condone the use of violence, threats, or intimidation for political or religious purposes. We strongly advocate for peaceful, respectful, and free communication and open debate without fear of reprisal or punishment.