Image

UK-US Trade Deal Has No Free Speech or Religious Freedom Protection Clauses

“Dubbed a Free Trade Agreement, the UK-US trade deal may help fortify Brexit.”

Trump’s tough love tariffs have produced a massive “reciprocal” trade deal with the United Kingdom.

Anxious, UK PM, Kier Starmer, was quick to the table after “Liberation Day” tariffs were announced in March.

Relieved, he said, putting Britain “in front of the queue” has saved jobs.

Suggesting a bonus, he added, this was also “jobs won. But not job done.

“Our teams will continue to work to build on this agreement.”

Starmer, whose popularity has spectacularly dropped since coming to power 10 months ago, explained that the deal will benefit “key sectors such as car manufacturing and steel.”

Reformed UK’s Nigel Farage agreed in principle, telling the BBC, the outcome was “another benefit of Brexit.”

Although “there’s a lot more detail to come out, we’re heading in the right direction,” he said.

Dubbed a Free Trade Agreement, the UK-US trade deal may help fortify Brexit.

Unpacking the agreement, the Birmingham Journal described the Trade deal as an “essential part of the UK’s post-Brexit strategy.

“By diversifying Trade partners, the United Kingdom and US can mitigate dangers from depending too closely on the EU or different regions” – (like China).

Reading a brief on the US-UK trade deal, Trump said signing the reciprocal agreement on the 80th Anniversary of the end of WW2’s European theatre, was symbolic.

A White House fact sheet also cited Trump as saying, “This is now turning out to be, really, a great deal for both countries.”

When the Daily Wire asked if the deal requires assurances from Britain to protect free speech and religion. 

The answer was no. 

Howard Lutnick, Trump’s Secretary of Commerce, said, “The deal only focuses on the economy and business.”

Lutnick’s comments don’t bode well for Australians hoping the Trump administration will put more pressure on the Labor Government to secure protections for God-given civil liberties in Australia (see here).

With the large amount of manufacturing potential and natural resources Australia has, it remains to be seen whether or not the returning Australian Labor government can broker a similar deal.

The Labor government would have to liberate Australia from its economic dependence on Communist China, the same way Trump is fighting for America.

An unlikely scenario given Albanese’s socialist tendency to shy away from confrontations with Communists in Beijing, in spite of Canberra’s familial, well-oiled relationship with Washington.

Albanese says he wants a deal, and Trump is open to one. At least that’s what the ABC are telling us. 

Even though the White House has said the UK-US trade agreement “sets the tone for other trading partners to promote reciprocal trade with the United States,” Australia is already on the back foot.

Malcolm Turnbull’s remarks about Trump being a “bully” and Kevin Rudd’s mockery of the President’s tariffs have made any Australian trade delegations’ job a lot harder.

The two former defeated Prime Ministers apparently still think they run the ship.

Their recent “hate Trump, because love trumps hate” howls may sink any trade options aimed at benefiting both countries.

Like Malcolm Turnbull’s recent remarks, Kevin07’s smug, unsolicited public criticisms of the US president will – if they haven’t already – sour any tariff resolving diplomacy. 

Despite Rudd deleting rants calling the US president a “traitor, a threat to democracy, and destructive,” Trump doesn’t forget.

When it comes to US-Australia relations, Turnbull’s narcissistic interference is a nuisance; Rudd’s arrogant hypocrisy, though, is catastrophic.

Rudd’s views linger. Additionally, Rudd still has Albanese’s full backing.

Based on the rhetoric and the optics, Trump would naturally be wary.

With Turnbull heckling from the sidelines and Rudd firing verbal abuse from his cushy position as Ambassador, Trump would logically assume the Australian Labor Party thinks the same way.

Consequently, Albanese, who once said Trump “scares the s*** out of him,” has little chance of scoring for Australia, anywhere close to the deal the UK just struck with the US.

Special Request:

For nearly eight years, we've highlighted issues ignored by mainstream media and resisted globalist ideologies eroding Western civilization. We've done this joyfully, without paywalls, despite personal costs to our team. Your support has kept us going, but operating costs exceed donations, forcing us to use ads. We’d love to ditch them, so we’re asking for your help. If you value our work, please consider supporting us via Stripe or PayPal. Every bit helps us keep fighting for our kids’ future. Thank you!

What's New?

Use the blue arrows at the bottom to scroll through the latest.
So, Who Decides What Counts as Hate?

So, Who Decides What Counts as Hate?

You can't police what you can't coherently define.
By
by Ben DavisDec 18, 2025
Florida Designates the Muslim Brotherhood a Foreign Terrorist Organisation

Florida Designates the Muslim Brotherhood a Foreign Terrorist Organisation

“The order rightly calls out the Muslim Brotherhood’s subterfuge and ideology as ‘irreconcilable with foundational American principles of life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness.’”
By
by Rod LampardDec 18, 2025
Theology Has Public Consequences

Theology Has Public Consequences

"Theology does not remain private; it works itself out in culture, institutions, and public life."
By
by Staff WriterDec 17, 2025
Deeming Backs Smith After Pronoun Police Penalty: Refusing to Affirm a Lie Isn’t Dishonesty – It’s Courage!

Deeming Backs Smith After Pronoun Police Penalty: Refusing to Affirm a Lie Isn’t Dishonesty – It’s Courage!

“By supporting Kirralie, you’re really supporting every single Australian who wants to speak up in the future. This is especially so for women, because when one woman is punished for this, thousands of women are made silent.”
By
by Rod LampardDec 17, 2025
We Don’t Need Antisemitism Laws—We Need Anti-Australia Laws

We Don’t Need Antisemitism Laws—We Need Anti-Australia Laws

Australia does not need race-based antisemitism laws; it needs a pro-Australian legal framework that applies equally to all and punishes harmful conduct regardless of who commits it or who the victim is.
By
by Ben DavisDec 17, 2025
From “You Do You” to Leadership Coups: The Deadly Fruit of Post-Modernists in the Pulpit

From “You Do You” to Leadership Coups: The Deadly Fruit of Post-Modernists in the Pulpit

“Anyone who says that there are no truths, or that all truth is ‘merely relative,’ is asking you not to believe him. So don’t!”
By
by Rod LampardDec 16, 2025
Matt Walsh Slams Australian Government After Bondi Shooting

Matt Walsh Slams Australian Government After Bondi Shooting

"Rules are not enough. You also need to ensure that your country is full of people who are willing to follow those rules. And in that very important respect, Australia has clearly failed."
By
by Staff WriterDec 16, 2025
A Government Too Afraid to Name the Problem Can Never Fix It

A Government Too Afraid to Name the Problem Can Never Fix It

"Governments have become not only incapable but increasingly unwilling to acknowledge the simple and self-evident truth that some ideas are bad, and bad ideas inevitably produce bad behaviour."
By
by Ben DavisDec 16, 2025

Image

Support

If you value our work and would like to support us, you can do so by visiting our support page. Can’t find what you’re looking for? Visit our search page.

Copyright © 2025, Caldron Pool

Permissions

Everything published at Caldron Pool is protected by copyright and cannot be used and/or duplicated without prior written permission. Links and excerpts with full attribution are permitted. Published articles represent the opinions of the author and may not reflect the views of all contributors at Caldron Pool.

Caldron Pool does not condone the use of violence, threats, or intimidation for political or religious purposes. We strongly advocate for peaceful, respectful, and free communication and open debate without fear of reprisal or punishment.