Image

To the Right of Genghis Khan

"Being a pure accelerationist in a time of passionate belief."

I have not encountered anyone further to the right than me, and I can state unequivocally that the “horseshoe theory” is false.

I’m often asked (mainly in DMs) what my political orientation is. Yes, my bio says that I’m a Catholic apologist, and I’ve referred to myself repeatedly here and there as a “reactionary” but they’re not very specific terms.

I think the two are perfectly adequate descriptively, but I can see how some clarification might be helpful. 

At university, I was on the left, as many people are. As Churchill put it, Show me a young man who isn’t on the left and I’ll show you a man without a heart. Show me an older man who isn’t on the right and I’ll show you a man without a brain.

I moved through the usual, unimaginative pathway; from left to libertarian, to conservative, to various manifestations of the hard right. I communicated with most of the leading luminaries of the Alt-Right when they were at their zenith, but otherwise kept a low profile.

Now my position is simple. I don’t have one.

Wait… don’t dismiss me so fast. There’s a point, and it’s the same reason I consider myself to be further to the right than all of you, and it’s this:

You all believe that your methods will bring about either a lessening of the symptoms we suffer from, a restoration of some lost epoch, or the construction of a full-blown utopia.

I don’t. Only people to the left of me do that.

The only thing that can save our society… is its destruction. Its total obliteration. 

Its ending.

There’s no knowing what would come after. Probably a period of profound disturbance, violence, darkness and suffering. 

Wars. Famine. Disease. Death. Death on a vast scale.

It’s not a cheerful vision, I grant you. But it has the virtue of realism. This society, such as it is, doesn’t want to survive. Like all late-stage empires, it is seemingly compelled by some inner inertia to make things worse the nearer the end looms.

All of you believe that there’s a system or a method or some other thing, some techne as the ancient Greeks would have referred to it, that could prevent the vase from falling to the ground and shattering.

I’m seemingly the only guy standing there in the corner, looking at all of you scrabbling and fighting over it, left and right, and all I can think to do is pick up a bat and shatter it before your disbelieving eyes.

If society is allowed to die now, before western lands have been irreversibly changed, after the following dark period, whatever comes next is bound to be better than what is now. 

This loathsome, insipid, idiotic epoch. 

“But what about all of the finely-balanced economic and technical structures that will collapse along with it?” You’ll ask. 

Let them. I’m something of a Kaczynskite in the sense that I think technology has only served to harm the human experience from around the 18th Century onward. 

Christ himself advised against it, insisting instead that we should live as nature does, without seeking to control everything, because if we don’t, in the end, we are always the ones who wind up being deprived of our freedom.

Whatever comes next, comes next. I have faith. I know my children and their children will lead their lives in the manner in which they were always intended. We’ve taken steps to make our family resilient. So should you. 

Stop trying to control that which is beyond controlling. We cannot make good that which is terminal.

…but we can turn off the life support.

Special Request:

For nearly eight years, we've highlighted issues ignored by mainstream media and resisted globalist ideologies eroding Western civilization. We've done this joyfully, without paywalls, despite personal costs to our team. Your support has kept us going, but operating costs exceed donations, forcing us to use ads. We’d love to ditch them, so we’re asking for your help. If you value our work, please consider supporting us via Stripe or PayPal. Every bit helps us keep fighting for our kids’ future. Thank you!

What's New?

Use the blue arrows at the bottom to scroll through the latest.
16-Year-Old Explains Why the Social Media Ban Won’t Work

16-Year-Old Explains Why the Social Media Ban Won’t Work

"There are three very prominent concerns when it comes to how this law will actually work and the repercussions it could have."
By
by Selah CampisiDec 15, 2025
Bondi Massacre: A Wake-Up Call for Australia

Bondi Massacre: A Wake-Up Call for Australia

"Without honest discourse, decisive policy, and recognition that not all cultures can coexist harmoniously, such attacks are likely to recur—just look at Europe today."
By
by Staff WriterDec 15, 2025
White Guilt is Dead

White Guilt is Dead

"For decades, White guilt has been used as a tool of social control—silencing dissent, suppressing legitimate demographic concerns, and guilt-tripping Westerners into accepting policies that no other civilisation on earth would tolerate."
By
by Staff WriterDec 13, 2025
Brave New Families: How State Power Is Replacing Parental Responsibility

Brave New Families: How State Power Is Replacing Parental Responsibility

“All I see is the dystopian Brave New future that are projections of our simplistic mechanistic leaders, which makes sense, given their godfather is Karl Marx, a determinist who has bred many of his kind after his image.”
By
by Dr Stephen FysonDec 12, 2025
When the State Becomes Co-Parent: Australia’s Intrusion into Family Life

When the State Becomes Co-Parent: Australia’s Intrusion into Family Life

"As the state once absorbed the moral and spiritual leadership of the Church over society, so too can it absorb the moral and spiritual authority of parents over their children."
By
by Staff WriterDec 11, 2025
Tarantino Ranks ‘The Passion of the Christ’ Among the Best Films of the Century

Tarantino Ranks ‘The Passion of the Christ’ Among the Best Films of the Century

“I think it actually is one of the most brilliant visual storytelling films ever made,” he said.
By
by Rod LampardDec 11, 2025
Truth Tax: Senate Dissenters Reject Albo’s FOI Amendments as a “Hubris-Driven Attack on Transparency”

Truth Tax: Senate Dissenters Reject Albo’s FOI Amendments as a “Hubris-Driven Attack on Transparency”

"The consensus from dissenters seems to be that this bill further distances the Australian government from the people its representatives are elected to serve."
By
by Rod LampardDec 10, 2025
Speech Rejected, Promiscuity Approved

Speech Rejected, Promiscuity Approved

"The question arises, while Candace Owens' verbalising conservative values is not in our nation's interest, Lily Philips' sleeping around with Australian men is?"
By
by Selah CampisiDec 9, 2025

Image

Support

If you value our work and would like to support us, you can do so by visiting our support page. Can’t find what you’re looking for? Visit our search page.

Copyright © 2025, Caldron Pool

Permissions

Everything published at Caldron Pool is protected by copyright and cannot be used and/or duplicated without prior written permission. Links and excerpts with full attribution are permitted. Published articles represent the opinions of the author and may not reflect the views of all contributors at Caldron Pool.

Caldron Pool does not condone the use of violence, threats, or intimidation for political or religious purposes. We strongly advocate for peaceful, respectful, and free communication and open debate without fear of reprisal or punishment.