Image

Renewed Calls for ‘Castle Law’ in Australia: You Break In, You Forfeit Your Rights

"Victims do not feel safe in their own homes knowing that offenders have more rights than occupants."

Katter’s Australian Party (KAP) Deputy Leader and Hinchinbrook MP Nick Dametto is calling for urgent legislative reform to strengthen self-defence rights for Queensland homeowners, following a violent home invasion and sexual assault in Cairns earlier this year.

Dametto is championing what has been dubbed the “Castle Law,” a proposed legal framework that would allow residents to defend themselves and their property without fear of prosecution. The proposed law asserts that intruders forfeit their legal protections once they unlawfully enter someone’s home.

“People should have the right to defend themselves, their families, and their properties without fearing legal consequences,” Dametto said in a statement. “Castle Law would make it crystal clear – if you break into someone’s home, you forfeit your rights.”

The renewed calls come in response to an incident in February, where a woman was allegedly sexually assaulted during a break-in by multiple young offenders. The case has intensified public concern over what many view as a growing crime wave across the state.

“During the night, a woman was allegedly subjected to one of the most terrifying and violating crimes imaginable, in her own home, by a pack of young criminals who think they can act with impunity,” Mr Dametto said in a statement at the time.

“This is outrageous, predatory offending allegedly committed by youth criminals inside someone’s own home, a place that should be a safe haven. This is exactly why we need Castle Law in Queensland.”

Dametto criticised current laws as inadequate, particularly highlighting gaps in the state’s “adult crime-adult time” policy, which he says fails to include rape among offences eligible for tougher sentencing. He also called for “bush sentencing” for youth offenders, arguing that removing young criminals from city environments could help curb reoffending.

“Queensland is in a crime crisis that is only getting worse,” Dametto added. “We all deserve the right to feel safe in our homes and have the legal protection of Castle Law to defend ourselves if needed.”

Earlier this month, Dametto sponsored a bill to introduce Castle Law in Queensland. An accompanying e-petition has already garnered close to 40,000 signatures.

The petition, addressed to the Speaker and Members of the Queensland Legislative Assembly, claims that the current laws leave homeowners vulnerable to legal action if they use force during a home invasion. It argues that existing statutes requiring “reasonable force” are too ambiguous and subject to interpretation, potentially putting victims at risk of criminal charges.

The petition, which urges the House to do everything in its power to legislate Castle Law in Queensland, states:

Queenslanders do not feel safe in their own homes knowing that offenders have more rights than occupants. Every Queenslander deserves the right to protect themselves, their loved ones, and their property. Currently, in Queensland if a person chooses to defend themselves or others during a home invasion they may only use force that is reasonably necessary in all of the circumstances. What is reasonable in all of the circumstances is open to a broad interpretation. Homeowners who carry out self-defence may end up facing criminal charges such as assault, or in extreme cases, murder.

The current self-defence laws are inadequate and force victims to second-guess their actions when faced with a split-second, life-threatening situation. Good laws should be in place to protect good people. Introducing Castle Law in Queensland would give victims the right to use whatever force necessary to protect themselves, others within the premises and their property if faced with an intruder(s). Castle Law (or the Castle Doctrine) is a principle grounded in the fundamental right to self-defence. A Queenslander’s home is their castle.

This marks the second public petition on the issue, reflecting what supporters say is growing public demand for legal reform to protect homeowners.

You can sign and read the petition here.

Special Request:

For nearly eight years, we've highlighted issues ignored by mainstream media and resisted globalist ideologies eroding Western civilization. We've done this joyfully, without paywalls, despite personal costs to our team. Your support has kept us going, but operating costs exceed donations, forcing us to use ads. We’d love to ditch them, so we’re asking for your help. If you value our work, please consider supporting us via Stripe or PayPal. Every bit helps us keep fighting for our kids’ future. Thank you!

What's New?

Use the blue arrows at the bottom to scroll through the latest.
16-Year-Old Explains Why the Social Media Ban Won’t Work

16-Year-Old Explains Why the Social Media Ban Won’t Work

"There are three very prominent concerns when it comes to how this law will actually work and the repercussions it could have."
By
by Selah CampisiDec 15, 2025
Bondi Massacre: A Wake-Up Call for Australia

Bondi Massacre: A Wake-Up Call for Australia

"Without honest discourse, decisive policy, and recognition that not all cultures can coexist harmoniously, such attacks are likely to recur—just look at Europe today."
By
by Staff WriterDec 15, 2025
White Guilt is Dead

White Guilt is Dead

"For decades, White guilt has been used as a tool of social control—silencing dissent, suppressing legitimate demographic concerns, and guilt-tripping Westerners into accepting policies that no other civilisation on earth would tolerate."
By
by Staff WriterDec 13, 2025
Brave New Families: How State Power Is Replacing Parental Responsibility

Brave New Families: How State Power Is Replacing Parental Responsibility

“All I see is the dystopian Brave New future that are projections of our simplistic mechanistic leaders, which makes sense, given their godfather is Karl Marx, a determinist who has bred many of his kind after his image.”
By
by Dr Stephen FysonDec 12, 2025
When the State Becomes Co-Parent: Australia’s Intrusion into Family Life

When the State Becomes Co-Parent: Australia’s Intrusion into Family Life

"As the state once absorbed the moral and spiritual leadership of the Church over society, so too can it absorb the moral and spiritual authority of parents over their children."
By
by Staff WriterDec 11, 2025
Tarantino Ranks ‘The Passion of the Christ’ Among the Best Films of the Century

Tarantino Ranks ‘The Passion of the Christ’ Among the Best Films of the Century

“I think it actually is one of the most brilliant visual storytelling films ever made,” he said.
By
by Rod LampardDec 11, 2025
Truth Tax: Senate Dissenters Reject Albo’s FOI Amendments as a “Hubris-Driven Attack on Transparency”

Truth Tax: Senate Dissenters Reject Albo’s FOI Amendments as a “Hubris-Driven Attack on Transparency”

"The consensus from dissenters seems to be that this bill further distances the Australian government from the people its representatives are elected to serve."
By
by Rod LampardDec 10, 2025
Speech Rejected, Promiscuity Approved

Speech Rejected, Promiscuity Approved

"The question arises, while Candace Owens' verbalising conservative values is not in our nation's interest, Lily Philips' sleeping around with Australian men is?"
By
by Selah CampisiDec 9, 2025

Image

Support

If you value our work and would like to support us, you can do so by visiting our support page. Can’t find what you’re looking for? Visit our search page.

Copyright © 2025, Caldron Pool

Permissions

Everything published at Caldron Pool is protected by copyright and cannot be used and/or duplicated without prior written permission. Links and excerpts with full attribution are permitted. Published articles represent the opinions of the author and may not reflect the views of all contributors at Caldron Pool.

Caldron Pool does not condone the use of violence, threats, or intimidation for political or religious purposes. We strongly advocate for peaceful, respectful, and free communication and open debate without fear of reprisal or punishment.