Image

NSW Labor Signals Ban On Homeschooling

"State Education Secretary Murat Dizdar told the ABC on Monday that alternatives to government education were unnecessary."

New South Wales Labor has signalled a ban on home and private education.

State Education Secretary Murat Dizdar told the ABC on Monday that alternatives to government education were unnecessary.

Dizdar – an apparent Marxist – expressed a desire to force NSW into line with other countries (presumably China) that only allow “one provision for education.”

In his view, the only “educational pathway” is a public structure centralised and completely controlled by bureaucrats.

Notably, Dizdar’s views are supported by LGBTQ+ activist, and former High Court judge, Michael Kirby.

Right to be outraged, homeschooling and Catholic groups raised concerns about Dizdar’s totalitarian posturing.

Dallas McInerney, Chief Executive Officer of Catholic Schools NSW, described Dizdar’s statements as “outrageously bad and very worrying.”

McInerney’s protest wasn’t groundless.

He backed Mark Latham’s 2021 parental rights bill, which sought to keep government fads, and ideological activism like Marxian Woke critical theory out of education.

Likewise, Sydney Catholic Schools director, Danielle Cronin scolded the education secretary’s apparent agenda by posting a brief history of education.

“This offends on so many different levels,” she said in a statement posted on LinkedIn.

Private education has been “part of the fabric of this great state for more than 200 years.

“Catholic and other faith-based schools existed well before the state stepped in to provide public education.”

He seems to have “forgotten that parents have a universal right to choose the school most appropriate for their children,” Cronin added.

Responding to Dizdar’s firestorm, NSW Labor Premier Chris Minns attempted to reassure concerned parents and teachers.

In a statement widely shared by legacy media, Minns said his party wasn’t looking at cancelling parental rights.

“We’re certainly not going to stop school choice or change policies in relation to private education,” Minns stated.

School choice was “fundamental to the education system in NSW.”

Contradicting Minns, Dizdar responded to criticisms stating that while he “recognised the importance of the private education sector,” he was completely committed to the “transformational power of public education.”

Many serious educators and concerned parents will justifiably read this as a Dizdar advocating for the power to indoctrinate.

Noticing the contradiction, NSW opposition leader, Mark Speakman (LNP)  said Dizdar’s position and views were at odds with the Labor Premier and education minister’s reassurances about supporting school choice.

“It is untenable for private schools to have as their education boss someone who wants to abolish them.”

The education secretary had to go, Speakman argued.

Broader concerns about Dizdar’s assertions relate to Labor’s shock decision to move Homeschooling from NESA (the NSW Education Standards Authority) to the Department of Education. 

From 5 May 2025, the DoE will “assume responsibility for the regulation of homeschooling in NSW.”

It’s a move that education minister, Prue Car hasn’t satisfactorily explained.

Additionally, the language used by the DoE echoes the totalitarian language being used by Dizdar.

The official reasoning given for moving homeschooling from NESA to the DoE is to “align NSW with other states.”

This appears to reflect Dizdar’s goal of “aligning NSW education with” countries like Communist China, and its state-based school system run on contempt for parents, coercion, and control.

Commenting on Labor’s change, Homeschool advocacy group, VIGIL said the move “represents a significant threat to the independence, impartiality, and viability of home education in NSW.”

VIGIL founder, Ally Chumley outlined a list of “grave concerns” in a 3-page pushback published in late March.

Tapping into Dizdar’s totalitarian talking points, Chumley said, the rapid change suggests a “broader national push toward centralised control of education, potentially threatening homeschooling freedoms.”

The lack of transparency and consultation about the changes wasn’t just Labor showing contempt for home education, it expressed a disregard for parental rights.

Worse, Prue Car and Dizdar’s decision undermines NESA’s hard work.

The transition destroys NESA’s working relationship with homeschooling families.

As Chumley argued, NESA had become “a fair and experienced regulator.”

Removing NESA from the conversation takes away an “impartial intermediary and undermines legal protections in the NSW Education Act (1990).”

Homeschooling in NSW is currently legal under section 5d of the Act.

Offering thoughts on the sudden changes, VIGIL suggested that the government was panicking about the decline in public school enrolments and reacting to the rise in homeschooling.

According to Home Education Australia (HEA) homeschooling in NSW rose from 2,500 students in 2015 to almost 10,000 in 2021.

This reasoning is partially backed by the transcript of an interview between reporters, Anthony Albanese, Minns, and Car in early March this year.

As a way of moving forward, VIGIL invited the NSW government to sit down and talk.

They are seeking a suspension of the transition pending consultation with homeschoolers.

This includes full disclosure about the reason for the transition; as well as a commitment to safeguard parental rights.

On the same page as VIGIL, Independent NSW legislator, Mark Latham said on X the transition from NESA to the DoE seemed to be part of a planned demolition of home and private schooling.

Only, Dizdar was saying the quiet parts out loud.

John Ruddick voiced just as ferocious an opposition.

When asked about the transition and threat to homeschoolers, he said the transition sounded “diabolical.”

Ruddick also put out a statement arguing for Dizdar’s resignation.

“Mr Dizdar wants your children to have no choice but to be brainwashed by his wacky Department of Education,” Ruddick asserted.

This “extreme lefty wants to use the violence of the state to abolish non-government schools.”

“We believe in the decentralisation of childhood education. Every school should be a private school,” Ruddick added.

The Libertarians will motion for Dizdar’s removal in May after NSW Parliament resumes.

Special Request:

For nearly eight years, we've highlighted issues ignored by mainstream media and resisted globalist ideologies eroding Western civilization. We've done this joyfully, without paywalls, despite personal costs to our team. Your support has kept us going, but operating costs exceed donations, forcing us to use ads. We’d love to ditch them, so we’re asking for your help. If you value our work, please consider supporting us via Stripe or PayPal. Every bit helps us keep fighting for our kids’ future. Thank you!

What's New?

Use the blue arrows at the bottom to scroll through the latest.
16-Year-Old Explains Why the Social Media Ban Won’t Work

16-Year-Old Explains Why the Social Media Ban Won’t Work

"There are three very prominent concerns when it comes to how this law will actually work and the repercussions it could have."
By
by Selah CampisiDec 15, 2025
Bondi Massacre: A Wake-Up Call for Australia

Bondi Massacre: A Wake-Up Call for Australia

"Without honest discourse, decisive policy, and recognition that not all cultures can coexist harmoniously, such attacks are likely to recur—just look at Europe today."
By
by Staff WriterDec 15, 2025
White Guilt is Dead

White Guilt is Dead

"For decades, White guilt has been used as a tool of social control—silencing dissent, suppressing legitimate demographic concerns, and guilt-tripping Westerners into accepting policies that no other civilisation on earth would tolerate."
By
by Staff WriterDec 13, 2025
Brave New Families: How State Power Is Replacing Parental Responsibility

Brave New Families: How State Power Is Replacing Parental Responsibility

“All I see is the dystopian Brave New future that are projections of our simplistic mechanistic leaders, which makes sense, given their godfather is Karl Marx, a determinist who has bred many of his kind after his image.”
By
by Dr Stephen FysonDec 12, 2025
When the State Becomes Co-Parent: Australia’s Intrusion into Family Life

When the State Becomes Co-Parent: Australia’s Intrusion into Family Life

"As the state once absorbed the moral and spiritual leadership of the Church over society, so too can it absorb the moral and spiritual authority of parents over their children."
By
by Staff WriterDec 11, 2025
Tarantino Ranks ‘The Passion of the Christ’ Among the Best Films of the Century

Tarantino Ranks ‘The Passion of the Christ’ Among the Best Films of the Century

“I think it actually is one of the most brilliant visual storytelling films ever made,” he said.
By
by Rod LampardDec 11, 2025
Truth Tax: Senate Dissenters Reject Albo’s FOI Amendments as a “Hubris-Driven Attack on Transparency”

Truth Tax: Senate Dissenters Reject Albo’s FOI Amendments as a “Hubris-Driven Attack on Transparency”

"The consensus from dissenters seems to be that this bill further distances the Australian government from the people its representatives are elected to serve."
By
by Rod LampardDec 10, 2025
Speech Rejected, Promiscuity Approved

Speech Rejected, Promiscuity Approved

"The question arises, while Candace Owens' verbalising conservative values is not in our nation's interest, Lily Philips' sleeping around with Australian men is?"
By
by Selah CampisiDec 9, 2025

Image

Support

If you value our work and would like to support us, you can do so by visiting our support page. Can’t find what you’re looking for? Visit our search page.

Copyright © 2025, Caldron Pool

Permissions

Everything published at Caldron Pool is protected by copyright and cannot be used and/or duplicated without prior written permission. Links and excerpts with full attribution are permitted. Published articles represent the opinions of the author and may not reflect the views of all contributors at Caldron Pool.

Caldron Pool does not condone the use of violence, threats, or intimidation for political or religious purposes. We strongly advocate for peaceful, respectful, and free communication and open debate without fear of reprisal or punishment.