Image

Mar-A-Lago Raid Was Political: Trump Invited FBI to Review Documents Months Ago

Not only did the FBI have past knowledge about the documents in question (they’ve known since 2019 and did nothing), Trump’s passports were illegally taken, and he had been cooperating with authorities for months prior to the shock home invasion.

The political vultures circling Trump at Mar-a-Lago may be in for a long wait.

Increasing pressure is on the Biden administration to justify their apparent use of the FBI to raid the former president’s home in early August, as new information raises questions about its legitimacy.

Not only did the FBI have past knowledge about the documents in question (they’ve known since 2019 and did nothing), Trump’s passports were illegally taken, and he had been cooperating with authorities for months prior to the shock home invasion.

The former president had invited the FBI to visit Mar-a-Lago in June.

‘The agents were shown a basement storage room with boxes of documents and memorabilia from when Trump was president,’ Epoch Times explained.

During the visit, ‘one agent who saw the storage room,’ thanked Trump’s lawyers, allegedly saying, “Thank you. You did not need to show us the storage room, but we appreciate it. Now it all makes sense.”

Additionally, Newsweek reported that dialogue between Trump and relevant authorities had been going on for 18 months, ‘the Trump camp and the Archives [being] engaged in a back-and-forth which resulted in the return of 15 boxes (and some additional documents).’

The area of concern, Newsweek asserted, was Trump’s “private collection,” said to ‘include material that Trump apparently thought would exonerate him of any claims of Russian collusion in 2016 or any other election-related charges.’

Acting on information from a ‘confidential human source,’ the FBI and DOJ have justified the raid on the belief that Trump was concealing sensitive material regarding American nuclear capabilities.

However, a former Trump official told Newsweek, “Trump was particularly interested in matters related to the Russia hoax and the wrong-doings of the deep state. […] I think he felt, and I agree, that these are facts that the American people need to know.”

The source said, “Trump may have been planning to use them as part of a 2024 run for the presidency.”

Trump has cause for concern with never-Trumpers, such as (Republican) Liz Cheney, insisting the FBI raid on Trump’s residence was not politically motivated while expressing in the same breath, “we have to make sure that [Trump] is not our [2024] nominee.”

Cheney chairs the January 6 committee. A convenient buttress for the Biden presidency, which looks set to stop a formidable political opponent – to use Cheney’s words – “from ever being in a position of power again.”

The “insurrection at the capitol” chair is adamant that Trump’s questions about the 2020 coronation of Joe Biden, are a threat to democracy.

Bellowing the narrative, Cheney said, “characterizations of U.S. elections as rigged is dangerous and disrupts the fundamental function and principle at the centre of our constitutional republic.”

In not-so-good news for Trump haters, the fallout from the FBI raid on Mar-a-Lago continues to worsen.

Questions about the raid’s legitimacy come amidst the release of explosive claims from Mark Zuckerberg during the Joe Rogan podcast declaring that Facebook buried news of Hunter Biden’s laptop at the behest of the FBI for seven days during the 2020 election.

Insurrection much?

As the meme chimed: “Maybe it’s not what they’re trying to find on him, but what Trump might have on them.”

WATCH:

Special Request:

For nearly eight years, we've highlighted issues ignored by mainstream media and resisted globalist ideologies eroding Western civilization. We've done this joyfully, without paywalls, despite personal costs to our team. Your support has kept us going, but operating costs exceed donations, forcing us to use ads. We’d love to ditch them, so we’re asking for your help. If you value our work, please consider supporting us via Stripe or PayPal. Every bit helps us keep fighting for our kids’ future. Thank you!

What's New?

Use the blue arrows at the bottom to scroll through the latest.
16-Year-Old Explains Why the Social Media Ban Won’t Work

16-Year-Old Explains Why the Social Media Ban Won’t Work

"There are three very prominent concerns when it comes to how this law will actually work and the repercussions it could have."
By
by Selah CampisiDec 15, 2025
Bondi Massacre: A Wake-Up Call for Australia

Bondi Massacre: A Wake-Up Call for Australia

"Without honest discourse, decisive policy, and recognition that not all cultures can coexist harmoniously, such attacks are likely to recur—just look at Europe today."
By
by Staff WriterDec 15, 2025
White Guilt is Dead

White Guilt is Dead

"For decades, White guilt has been used as a tool of social control—silencing dissent, suppressing legitimate demographic concerns, and guilt-tripping Westerners into accepting policies that no other civilisation on earth would tolerate."
By
by Staff WriterDec 13, 2025
Brave New Families: How State Power Is Replacing Parental Responsibility

Brave New Families: How State Power Is Replacing Parental Responsibility

“All I see is the dystopian Brave New future that are projections of our simplistic mechanistic leaders, which makes sense, given their godfather is Karl Marx, a determinist who has bred many of his kind after his image.”
By
by Dr Stephen FysonDec 12, 2025
When the State Becomes Co-Parent: Australia’s Intrusion into Family Life

When the State Becomes Co-Parent: Australia’s Intrusion into Family Life

"As the state once absorbed the moral and spiritual leadership of the Church over society, so too can it absorb the moral and spiritual authority of parents over their children."
By
by Staff WriterDec 11, 2025
Tarantino Ranks ‘The Passion of the Christ’ Among the Best Films of the Century

Tarantino Ranks ‘The Passion of the Christ’ Among the Best Films of the Century

“I think it actually is one of the most brilliant visual storytelling films ever made,” he said.
By
by Rod LampardDec 11, 2025
Truth Tax: Senate Dissenters Reject Albo’s FOI Amendments as a “Hubris-Driven Attack on Transparency”

Truth Tax: Senate Dissenters Reject Albo’s FOI Amendments as a “Hubris-Driven Attack on Transparency”

"The consensus from dissenters seems to be that this bill further distances the Australian government from the people its representatives are elected to serve."
By
by Rod LampardDec 10, 2025
Speech Rejected, Promiscuity Approved

Speech Rejected, Promiscuity Approved

"The question arises, while Candace Owens' verbalising conservative values is not in our nation's interest, Lily Philips' sleeping around with Australian men is?"
By
by Selah CampisiDec 9, 2025

Image

Support

If you value our work and would like to support us, you can do so by visiting our support page. Can’t find what you’re looking for? Visit our search page.

Copyright © 2025, Caldron Pool

Permissions

Everything published at Caldron Pool is protected by copyright and cannot be used and/or duplicated without prior written permission. Links and excerpts with full attribution are permitted. Published articles represent the opinions of the author and may not reflect the views of all contributors at Caldron Pool.

Caldron Pool does not condone the use of violence, threats, or intimidation for political or religious purposes. We strongly advocate for peaceful, respectful, and free communication and open debate without fear of reprisal or punishment.