Image

Liberal Senators Block Inquiry into Child Gender Medicine

"The proposed inquiry sought to highlight potential harms, elevate the voices of detransitioners, and hold the medical industry accountable."

On February 10, 2025, a pivotal vote in the Australian Senate aimed to investigate the effects of child gender medicine—specifically, the use of puberty blockers, cross-sex hormones, and irreversible surgeries on minors. The proposed inquiry sought to highlight potential harms, elevate the voices of detransitioners, and hold the medical industry accountable. However, the initiative was defeated when Liberal Senators Andrew Bragg, Maria Kovacic, and Richard Colbeck joined forces with Labor and the Greens to dismiss the inquiry.

The vote revealed a significant rift within the Liberal Party, as Bragg, Kovacic, and Colbeck chose to align with progressive factions instead of prioritizing transparency. Critics argue that their actions silenced victims, shielded the medical establishment from scrutiny, and undermined the conservative principles they were elected to uphold.

Internationally, countries such as the UK, Sweden, and Finland have begun to restrict these experimental treatments following evidence linking them to serious health risks, including sterility and bone loss. In the United States, the Trump administration is moving to ban procedures deemed dangerous based on growing research. In contrast, Australia remains stalled, largely due to the actions of these three senators.

In response to the Senate’s decision, a petition titled “You Voted Against Transparency on Child Gender Medicine—Australians Demand an Apology” has gained momentum. It specifically calls out Senators Bragg, Kovacic, and Colbeck, urging them to apologize publicly, acknowledge the international evidence of harm, and support a new inquiry. The petition has attracted thousands of signatures, reflecting a growing demand for accountability.

The implications of this vote are significant. Failure to address these issues could lead to further harm for vulnerable children, while the Liberal Party risks alienating its conservative base. As public pressure mounts, these senators may find themselves compelled to reconsider their stance on this critical issue.

You can view and sign the petition here.

Special Request:

For nearly eight years, we've highlighted issues ignored by mainstream media and resisted globalist ideologies eroding Western civilization. We've done this joyfully, without paywalls, despite personal costs to our team. Your support has kept us going, but operating costs exceed donations, forcing us to use ads. We’d love to ditch them, so we’re asking for your help. If you value our work, please consider supporting us via Stripe or PayPal. Every bit helps us keep fighting for our kids’ future. Thank you!

What's New?

Use the blue arrows at the bottom to scroll through the latest.
Final 130 Christian Children Freed After Month in Islamist Captivity in Nigeria

Final 130 Christian Children Freed After Month in Islamist Captivity in Nigeria

"Armed 'bandits' took 315 students and 12 staff members from Papiri’s St Mary's Catholic School captive in late November."
By
by Rod LampardJan 17, 2026
A Government That Won’t Acknowledge Christianity Can’t Defend the Nation

A Government That Won’t Acknowledge Christianity Can’t Defend the Nation

"By refusing to name its own moral foundations, the state undermines its ability to openly distinguish between belief systems that can coexist within its legal and moral order and those that fundamentally conflict with them. A society that cannot articulate its core moral commitments cannot coherently defend them."
By
by Staff WriterJan 16, 2026
Hate Speech Laws Are Just Blasphemy Laws

Hate Speech Laws Are Just Blasphemy Laws

"Blasphemy laws protect a society’s sacred object from verbal violation. Hate speech laws do the same, only the sacred object has changed. They are secularism’s answer to blasphemy law: enforcing reverence for the system’s ultimate values while denying that those values are religious at all."
By
by Staff WriterJan 15, 2026
Opposition Grows to Labor’s “Horrendous” Hate Speech Bill: “Worst Assault on Freedom Yet”

Opposition Grows to Labor’s “Horrendous” Hate Speech Bill: “Worst Assault on Freedom Yet”

Opposition to the federal government’s Combating Antisemitism, Hate and Extremism Bill 2026 is mounting across multiple parties, with MPs and senators warning that the rushed, broadly worded legislation threatens free speech, religious freedom and civil liberties while failing to address the causes of extremism.
By
by Staff WriterJan 15, 2026
Democrats Want Trump’s War Powers Limited Over a War With Venezuela That Doesn’t Exist

Democrats Want Trump’s War Powers Limited Over a War With Venezuela That Doesn’t Exist

“This Vote greatly hampers American self-defence and National Security, impeding the President’s Authority as Commander in Chief,” Trump wrote.
By
by Rod LampardJan 14, 2026
True Leaders Inspire Unity, Weak Men Legislate It

True Leaders Inspire Unity, Weak Men Legislate It

"Heavy-handed laws, by contrast, are a symptom of weakness—a last resort when authority has decayed, and coercion is all that remains."
By
by Staff WriterJan 13, 2026
Australians Sound Alarm Over New Draconian “Hate” Bill

Australians Sound Alarm Over New Draconian “Hate” Bill

"The Parliamentary Joint Committee on Intelligence and Security has allowed less than 48 hours for public submissions on the 144-page draft bill."
By
by Staff WriterJan 13, 2026
Hate Speech Laws Are an Admission of Government Failure

Hate Speech Laws Are an Admission of Government Failure

"Hate speech laws are evidence that our governments can no longer inspire loyalty, trust, or solidarity. They are an admission that policymakers have no unifying vision capable of bringing diverse people together voluntarily. So instead, they use force."
By
by Ben DavisJan 13, 2026

Image

Support

If you value our work and would like to support us, you can do so by visiting our support page. Can’t find what you’re looking for? Visit our search page.

Copyright © 2025, Caldron Pool

Permissions

Everything published at Caldron Pool is protected by copyright and cannot be used and/or duplicated without prior written permission. Links and excerpts with full attribution are permitted. Published articles represent the opinions of the author and may not reflect the views of all contributors at Caldron Pool.

Caldron Pool does not condone the use of violence, threats, or intimidation for political or religious purposes. We strongly advocate for peaceful, respectful, and free communication and open debate without fear of reprisal or punishment.