Image

Labour-Led Council Drops Plan to Criminalise Public Christianity

"Freedom of speech—and especially religious expression—is not a privilege handed out at the discretion of local authorities. It is a fundamental right, protected by law, and hard-won through centuries of struggle," said Andrea Williams, chief executive of the Christian Legal Centre.

A Labour-controlled local council has reversed course on a proposed legal injunction that would criminalise basic expressions of Christian faith in public spaces.

Rushmoor Borough Council, based in Hampshire, has announced it will pause its application for an injunction that sought to prohibit Christian street preaching, public prayer, and the distribution of religious literature in the town centres of Farnborough and Aldershot. The decision followed a meeting between council officials and Christian leaders on April 23.

The council’s legal action, originally filed in February, cited complaints about “aggressive behaviour” and “distress” caused by preachers using portable amplification and engaging with passersby. The proposed injunction would have banned laying hands on individuals, even with consent, as well as offering prayer or distributing Gospel tracts in public areas. Violators could have faced up to two years in prison.

Christian advocacy group Christian Concern and its legal arm, the Christian Legal Centre (CLC), provided legal and logistical support to the local preachers. In response to the council’s decision to pause the injunction, the CLC called the move a significant victory for religious freedom.

Andrea Williams, Chief Executive of the CLC, said the council’s efforts constituted “a direct assault on the liberties that underpin our democratic society,” warning that the attempted ban would set a dangerous precedent for freedom of speech and religious expression in the UK.

“Freedom of speech—and especially religious expression—is not a privilege handed out at the discretion of local authorities. It is a fundamental right, protected by law, and hard-won through centuries of struggle,” she said.”

According to The Telegraph, the council had worked on the legal case for two years and spent considerable taxpayer funds in the process. Notices about the injunction were reportedly displayed around the borough, and the council had initially received a court adjournment in March to allow for further consultation with religious and community groups.

The council maintained that the proposed injunction was never intended to target peaceful religious groups but was instead a response to persistent public complaints. A spokesperson stated that the legal action was meant to “protect vulnerable people and local businesses” from nuisance and distress.

A follow-up meeting is now scheduled between Rushmoor Borough Council and the preachers to discuss a path forward. The Christian Legal Centre said it will continue to monitor developments closely.

Williams encouraged Christians to stay vigilant and prayerful, urging them to “keep supporting efforts to protect the public square as a space for the gospel and the free exchange of ideas.”

Special Request:

For nearly eight years, we've highlighted issues ignored by mainstream media and resisted globalist ideologies eroding Western civilization. We've done this joyfully, without paywalls, despite personal costs to our team. Your support has kept us going, but operating costs exceed donations, forcing us to use ads. We’d love to ditch them, so we’re asking for your help. If you value our work, please consider supporting us via Stripe or PayPal. Every bit helps us keep fighting for our kids’ future. Thank you!

What's New?

Use the blue arrows at the bottom to scroll through the latest.
Deeming Backs Smith After Pronoun Police Penalty: Refusing to Affirm a Lie Isn’t Dishonesty – It’s Courage!

Deeming Backs Smith After Pronoun Police Penalty: Refusing to Affirm a Lie Isn’t Dishonesty – It’s Courage!

“By supporting Kirralie, you’re really supporting every single Australian who wants to speak up in the future. This is especially so for women, because when one woman is punished for this, thousands of women are made silent.”
By
by Rod LampardDec 17, 2025
We Don’t Need Antisemitism Laws—We Need Anti-Australia Laws

We Don’t Need Antisemitism Laws—We Need Anti-Australia Laws

Australia does not need race-based antisemitism laws; it needs a pro-Australian legal framework that applies equally to all and punishes harmful conduct regardless of who commits it or who the victim is.
By
by Ben DavisDec 17, 2025
From “You Do You” to Leadership Coups: The Deadly Fruit of Post-Modernists in the Pulpit

From “You Do You” to Leadership Coups: The Deadly Fruit of Post-Modernists in the Pulpit

“Anyone who says that there are no truths, or that all truth is ‘merely relative,’ is asking you not to believe him. So don’t!”
By
by Rod LampardDec 16, 2025
Matt Walsh Slams Australian Government After Bondi Shooting

Matt Walsh Slams Australian Government After Bondi Shooting

"Rules are not enough. You also need to ensure that your country is full of people who are willing to follow those rules. And in that very important respect, Australia has clearly failed."
By
by Staff WriterDec 16, 2025
A Government Too Afraid to Name the Problem Can Never Fix It

A Government Too Afraid to Name the Problem Can Never Fix It

"Governments have become not only incapable but increasingly unwilling to acknowledge the simple and self-evident truth that some ideas are bad, and bad ideas inevitably produce bad behaviour."
By
by Ben DavisDec 16, 2025
16-Year-Old Explains Why the Social Media Ban Won’t Work

16-Year-Old Explains Why the Social Media Ban Won’t Work

"There are three very prominent concerns when it comes to how this law will actually work and the repercussions it could have."
By
by Selah CampisiDec 15, 2025
Bondi Massacre: A Wake-Up Call for Australia

Bondi Massacre: A Wake-Up Call for Australia

"Without honest discourse, decisive policy, and recognition that not all cultures can coexist harmoniously, such attacks are likely to recur—just look at Europe today."
By
by Staff WriterDec 15, 2025
White Guilt is Dead

White Guilt is Dead

"For decades, White guilt has been used as a tool of social control—silencing dissent, suppressing legitimate demographic concerns, and guilt-tripping Westerners into accepting policies that no other civilisation on earth would tolerate."
By
by Staff WriterDec 13, 2025

Image

Support

If you value our work and would like to support us, you can do so by visiting our support page. Can’t find what you’re looking for? Visit our search page.

Copyright © 2025, Caldron Pool

Permissions

Everything published at Caldron Pool is protected by copyright and cannot be used and/or duplicated without prior written permission. Links and excerpts with full attribution are permitted. Published articles represent the opinions of the author and may not reflect the views of all contributors at Caldron Pool.

Caldron Pool does not condone the use of violence, threats, or intimidation for political or religious purposes. We strongly advocate for peaceful, respectful, and free communication and open debate without fear of reprisal or punishment.