Image

Erasing “Race” Was Never About Ending Racism

The denial of race as a meaningful concept not only undermines the biblical understanding of family, heritage, and covenant, but it also plays into the hands of ideologies that seek to erase the foundations of national and cultural identity.

The rejection of the concept of “race” was not a godly effort to combat “racism.” Instead, it functioned as propaganda designed to weaken the emerging threat to globalist agendas in the post-WWII era: national identities.

Many Christians embraced the idea, believing they had found common ground with the secularists. They jumped on the claim as evidence that Darwinism was false and waved the partially true banner of “One race, the human race.”

However, the concept of “race” is not a Darwinist idea. Sure, Darwin exploited and distorted it, but he did not invent it. The word “race” is derived from the Italian term razza, which just means “kind, species, or lineage”. English adopted it to mean “people of common descent, lineage, or breed.” In that sense, technically, you and your siblings are a new “race.” Everyone is a unique breed of their combined parentage. The further up the family tree, the broader the span of that particular “race.”

The denial of race, however, was part of a broader agenda to atomise societies, reducing people to isolated individuals, disconnected from their families, heritage, and ultimately, nations.

It sought to sever the connection between the present and the past, denying the blessings passed down through familial obedience, while dismissing curses as mere circumstantial.

This new approach framed history through an anti-biblical lens, where people exist in a social and covenantal vacuum, with no inherited privilege and no family legacies shaping their identity or future.

The rejection of “race” as a concept is not the Christian answer to “racism,” which is why “anti-racism” has been fundamental to several anti-Christian movements.

The denial of race as a meaningful concept not only undermines the biblical understanding of family, heritage, and covenant, but it also plays into the hands of ideologies that seek to erase the foundations of national and cultural identity.

In the end, it disconnects people from the past and leaves them as atomised individuals, adrift in a rootless, homogenised world. That is a globalist vision of the future, not a biblical view.

The Bible does not look forward to a day when all family distinctions are flattened. It looks forward to the day that the various, distinct nations, the ethnos of the world, will walk in the light of God’s holy city, while their kings offer up their national tributes to the King of kings (Rev. 21:24).

Shake off the propaganda. The reality of race no more justifies mistreating other ethnicities than the reality of gender justifies mistreating women. Likewise, the truth of our common origin does not excuse mistreating other races any more than family distinctions justify mistreating one’s neighbour.

The attempt to erase common origin is not a step toward heaven on earth, but a rebellion against the created order through which God has providentially worked for thousands of years through Godly families and nations.

Special Request:

For nearly eight years, we've highlighted issues ignored by mainstream media and resisted globalist ideologies eroding Western civilization. We've done this joyfully, without paywalls, despite personal costs to our team. Your support has kept us going, but operating costs exceed donations, forcing us to use ads. We’d love to ditch them, so we’re asking for your help. If you value our work, please consider supporting us via Stripe or PayPal. Every bit helps us keep fighting for our kids’ future. Thank you!

What's New?

Use the blue arrows at the bottom to scroll through the latest.
So, Who Decides What Counts as Hate?

So, Who Decides What Counts as Hate?

You can't police what you can't coherently define.
By
by Ben DavisDec 18, 2025
Florida Designates the Muslim Brotherhood a Foreign Terrorist Organisation

Florida Designates the Muslim Brotherhood a Foreign Terrorist Organisation

“The order rightly calls out the Muslim Brotherhood’s subterfuge and ideology as ‘irreconcilable with foundational American principles of life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness.’”
By
by Rod LampardDec 18, 2025
Theology Has Public Consequences

Theology Has Public Consequences

"Theology does not remain private; it works itself out in culture, institutions, and public life."
By
by Staff WriterDec 17, 2025
Deeming Backs Smith After Pronoun Police Penalty: Refusing to Affirm a Lie Isn’t Dishonesty – It’s Courage!

Deeming Backs Smith After Pronoun Police Penalty: Refusing to Affirm a Lie Isn’t Dishonesty – It’s Courage!

“By supporting Kirralie, you’re really supporting every single Australian who wants to speak up in the future. This is especially so for women, because when one woman is punished for this, thousands of women are made silent.”
By
by Rod LampardDec 17, 2025
We Don’t Need Antisemitism Laws—We Need Anti-Australia Laws

We Don’t Need Antisemitism Laws—We Need Anti-Australia Laws

Australia does not need race-based antisemitism laws; it needs a pro-Australian legal framework that applies equally to all and punishes harmful conduct regardless of who commits it or who the victim is.
By
by Ben DavisDec 17, 2025
From “You Do You” to Leadership Coups: The Deadly Fruit of Post-Modernists in the Pulpit

From “You Do You” to Leadership Coups: The Deadly Fruit of Post-Modernists in the Pulpit

“Anyone who says that there are no truths, or that all truth is ‘merely relative,’ is asking you not to believe him. So don’t!”
By
by Rod LampardDec 16, 2025
Matt Walsh Slams Australian Government After Bondi Shooting

Matt Walsh Slams Australian Government After Bondi Shooting

"Rules are not enough. You also need to ensure that your country is full of people who are willing to follow those rules. And in that very important respect, Australia has clearly failed."
By
by Staff WriterDec 16, 2025
A Government Too Afraid to Name the Problem Can Never Fix It

A Government Too Afraid to Name the Problem Can Never Fix It

"Governments have become not only incapable but increasingly unwilling to acknowledge the simple and self-evident truth that some ideas are bad, and bad ideas inevitably produce bad behaviour."
By
by Ben DavisDec 16, 2025

Image

Support

If you value our work and would like to support us, you can do so by visiting our support page. Can’t find what you’re looking for? Visit our search page.

Copyright © 2025, Caldron Pool

Permissions

Everything published at Caldron Pool is protected by copyright and cannot be used and/or duplicated without prior written permission. Links and excerpts with full attribution are permitted. Published articles represent the opinions of the author and may not reflect the views of all contributors at Caldron Pool.

Caldron Pool does not condone the use of violence, threats, or intimidation for political or religious purposes. We strongly advocate for peaceful, respectful, and free communication and open debate without fear of reprisal or punishment.