Image

“A Night of Shame”: Australia Passes Social Media Ban for Under 16s

"Let everybody look back on tonight as a night of shame."

Australia has become the first country in the world to ban children under 16 from using social media platforms, a move that critics warn will require every Australian to verify their age by linking social media accounts to a government-issued digital ID.

The legislation threatens social media companies with penalties of up to $50 million for non-compliance, sparking serious concerns over privacy, individual freedoms, and the erosion of parental rights.

Senator Matt Canavan delivered a scathing critique of the legislation, describing it as “a shameful stitch-up” and an “affront to our democracy.” Highlighting the rushed nature of the process, Canavan accused lawmakers of sidelining public opinion and democratic principles.

“A whole generation of Australians have watched this saga, this sordid saga, over the past week play out and be completely disillusioned with the democratic process,” Canavan said. “We’ve scheduled the debate for 10:30pm on the last day of school because we know that all the people that’ll be impacted by this ban will be in bed—it’s past their bedtime, they can’t even watch it.”

Critics have also raised concerns about the lack of transparency in the legislative process. Canavan noted the overwhelming public interest, with 15,000 submissions flooding in within 24 hours. Yet, he pointed out, only a fraction were even reviewed, calling it “an absolute outrage and a stitch-up of grand proportions.”

Canavan also challenged the bill’s fundamental premise: “Why is it that we’ve got this bill that seeks to, we think, we say—the minister says, ‘to help parents,’ and the word ‘parent’ is not mentioned at all in the bill. Not a single mention of the word parent in this bill. Why? Why aren’t we helping parents rather than trying to replace them? That’s what this bill tries to do. It tries to set up a nanny state.”

Senator Alex Antic, the only Liberal to oppose the bill, echoed Canavan’s criticisms, describing the bill as a recipe for chaos and an encroachment on basic freedoms. He pointed out glaring inconsistencies, such as exemptions for certain platforms:

“If you want to see some of the most egregious abuse you’ll ever see online, go online to a Call of Duty game and listen to the kids going at each other… it’s exempt! So, who’s thought of that one, minister? Who’s taken that into account?”

Antic painted a disturbing picture of where such legislation will lead, warning, “The Prime Minister and the Minister for Communications have boasted that the passing of this bill will make Australia a world leader in online safety. Well, they’re wrong. Because if this bill passes, we won’t be leading the world in online safety, we’ll be leading ourselves and those naïve enough to follow us down the road to further digital authoritarianism.”

He added, “When we finish tonight, we’ll have put another brick in the wall of a social credit style system in this country and let everybody look back on tonight as a night of shame.”

The new laws will be enacted in 2026.

Special Request:

For nearly eight years, we've highlighted issues ignored by mainstream media and resisted globalist ideologies eroding Western civilization. We've done this joyfully, without paywalls, despite personal costs to our team. Your support has kept us going, but operating costs exceed donations, forcing us to use ads. We’d love to ditch them, so we’re asking for your help. If you value our work, please consider supporting us via Stripe or PayPal. Every bit helps us keep fighting for our kids’ future. Thank you!

What's New?

Use the blue arrows at the bottom to scroll through the latest.
700 Psychiatrists Support “Gender-Affirming” Critic’s Battle to End  The LGBTransitioning of Kids

700 Psychiatrists Support “Gender-Affirming” Critic’s Battle to End  The LGBTransitioning of Kids

"These interventions don’t improve the child’s mental health and they don’t reduce the risk of suicide."
By
by Rod LampardApr 3, 2025
What is the Most Violent Ideology?

What is the Most Violent Ideology?

"There is one ideology that leaves others in its dust and continues to achieve a number of deaths at a rate of almost an entire World War 2 each year."
By
by Matthew LittlefieldApr 2, 2025
Senator Rennick: Australians Are “Enslaved to Debt”

Senator Rennick: Australians Are “Enslaved to Debt”

"Nothing controls people more than debt."
By
by Staff WriterApr 1, 2025
New COVID Censorship Bombshells Expose the Far-Left’s Weaponisation of Fact-Checking

New COVID Censorship Bombshells Expose the Far-Left’s Weaponisation of Fact-Checking

“The documents paint a picture of massive government-backed censorship.”
By
by Rod LampardApr 1, 2025
Ethnic Minorities Prioritized for Bail in Two-Tier System

Ethnic Minorities Prioritized for Bail in Two-Tier System

Newly revealed Ministry of Justice guidance instructs UK judges to prioritize bail hearings for ethnic minorities, women, and transgender defendants. In other words, everyone other than straight, White, males.
By
by Staff WriterMar 31, 2025
Tolerance Is Suicide

Tolerance Is Suicide

"For Western civilization to survive, it must relearn the lost Christian virtue of intolerance."
By
by Ben DavisMar 31, 2025
Irish Government Freezes Christian Teacher’s Bank Account After He Refused to Use Gender-Neutral Pronouns

Irish Government Freezes Christian Teacher’s Bank Account After He Refused to Use Gender-Neutral Pronouns

"What this is all about is an attempt to change the face of our country..."
By
by Staff WriterMar 31, 2025
We All Want More Than This World Can Give

We All Want More Than This World Can Give

“If we find ourselves with a desire that nothing in this world can satisfy, the most probable explanation is that we were made for another world.”
By
by Staff WriterMar 30, 2025

Image

Support

If you value our work and would like to support us, you can do so by visiting our support page. Can’t find what you’re looking for? Visit our search page.

Copyright © 2025, Caldron Pool

Permissions

Everything published at Caldron Pool is protected by copyright and cannot be used and/or duplicated without prior written permission. Links and excerpts with full attribution are permitted. Published articles represent the opinions of the author and may not reflect the views of all contributors at Caldron Pool.

Caldron Pool does not condone the use of violence, threats, or intimidation for political or religious purposes. We strongly advocate for peaceful, respectful, and free communication and open debate without fear of reprisal or punishment.