Image

WATCH: Reporter stunned as top abortionist admits he has no problem killing ‘babies’

A top US abortionist has left a BBC reporter lost for words after admitting he has no problem killing “babies.” Advertisement Life Site News shared a short portion of the interview between reporter Hilary Andersson and abortionist LeRoy Carhart, which was filmed at a Maryland abortion clinic in July for a thirty-minute segment titled America’s Abortion War. During the interview, Ms Andersson asked Carhart how late in the pregnancy he would perform an abortion. Carhart refused to respond on camera, but then left Ms Andersson visibly stunned by saying: “To the fetus, it makes no difference if it’s born or……

A top US abortionist has left a BBC reporter lost for words after admitting he has no problem killing “babies.”

Life Site News shared a short portion of the interview between reporter Hilary Andersson and abortionist LeRoy Carhart, which was filmed at a Maryland abortion clinic in July for a thirty-minute segment titled America’s Abortion War.

During the interview, Ms Andersson asked Carhart how late in the pregnancy he would perform an abortion. Carhart refused to respond on camera, but then left Ms Andersson visibly stunned by saying:

“To the fetus, it makes no difference if it’s born or not born. The baby has no input in this as far as I’m concerned.”

Ms Andersson then pointed out Carhart’s use of the word “baby” rather than “fetus”, asking why he would use that word when others prefer more dehumanizing terms.

“I think that it is a baby,” Carhart interrupted. “And I use [the word baby] with patients.”

Ms Andersson then asked if Carhart had any problem with killing a baby?

“Absolutely not,” Carhart coldly replied. “I have no problem if it’s in the mother’s uterus.”

There are some in the fight against abortion who believe the primary objective of the pro-life movement is to convince people of the scientific reasons why they should not kill their unborn children.

Much time and energy is spent trying to persuade pro-abortion apologists that an unborn baby is a human life, as though that fact wasn’t bleeding obvious to everyone. But what just about everyone in this debate will admit is, no matter how much scientific proof is offered up, abortion apologists more often than not, dismiss, ignore, and blatantly disregard the facts presented.

The fact is, in 2019, the humanity of the unborn has never been more obvious and undeniable. Which is why, when pushed hard enough, pro-abortionists will always appeal to arbitrary and unscientific criteria, like whether or not the baby has made the 7-inch journey through the birth canal.

This debate is no longer a question of science. The science is clear. This is a moral issue and a sin issue – because people would rather cling to a convenient lie in order to dull their consciences or fill their pockets than admit the truth and repent.

WATCH:

Special Request:

For nearly eight years, we've highlighted issues ignored by mainstream media and resisted globalist ideologies eroding Western civilization. We've done this joyfully, without paywalls, despite personal costs to our team. Your support has kept us going, but operating costs exceed donations, forcing us to use ads. We’d love to ditch them, so we’re asking for your help. If you value our work, please consider supporting us via Stripe or PayPal. Every bit helps us keep fighting for our kids’ future. Thank you!

What's New?

Use the blue arrows at the bottom to scroll through the latest.
ACT Pushes Law Mandating Dog Owners Spend Three Hours a Day With Pets

ACT Pushes Law Mandating Dog Owners Spend Three Hours a Day With Pets

"How exactly will the government track whether dog owners are meeting the three-hour requirement? And who will monitor this?"
By
by Staff WriterJul 9, 2025
Victims of Communism Curriculum Mandated in Texas Schools

Victims of Communism Curriculum Mandated in Texas Schools

"SB 24’s requirements will give voice and visibility to Karl Marx’s often marginalized victims by offering kids ‘first-hand accounts, in-person, and video-recorded testimonies.’"
By
by Rod LampardJul 8, 2025
Less Freedom Won’t Fix “Antisemitism”

Less Freedom Won’t Fix “Antisemitism”

"One man cannot threaten another if every man has his tongue cut out—but at what cost? The principle of individual rights must remain intact, even if the removal of some freedoms can reduce the violation of others."
By
by Ben DavisJul 7, 2025
Which Words Matter?

Which Words Matter?

“Words are literally the overflow of who we are, coming out from as down deep as you can go.”
By
by Dr Stephen FysonJul 7, 2025
Keep Building—Even When They Call You Bad Names

Keep Building—Even When They Call You Bad Names

"It is no new thing for the best of men to be evil spoken of."
By
by Ben DavisJul 6, 2025
Australians Could Be Forced to Submit Facial Scans to Access the Internet

Australians Could Be Forced to Submit Facial Scans to Access the Internet

Australia appears to be heading towards a surveillance state.
By
by Staff WriterJul 5, 2025
WHO Flips on COVID Mandates, Declares a Social Distancing Crisis

WHO Flips on COVID Mandates, Declares a Social Distancing Crisis

"New estimates suggest that approximately 871,000 deaths per year are due to loneliness, which, the WHO stated, is linked to social isolation and/or ostracisation."
By
by Rod LampardJul 4, 2025
Was Jesus a Jew?

Was Jesus a Jew?

What does it actually mean to call Jesus a "Jew," and does he truly fit that label?
By
by Ben DavisJul 3, 2025

Image

Support

If you value our work and would like to support us, you can do so by visiting our support page. Can’t find what you’re looking for? Visit our search page.

Copyright © 2025, Caldron Pool

Permissions

Everything published at Caldron Pool is protected by copyright and cannot be used and/or duplicated without prior written permission. Links and excerpts with full attribution are permitted. Published articles represent the opinions of the author and may not reflect the views of all contributors at Caldron Pool.

Caldron Pool does not condone the use of violence, threats, or intimidation for political or religious purposes. We strongly advocate for peaceful, respectful, and free communication and open debate without fear of reprisal or punishment.