Image

Robby Starbuck Sues Google for Defamation Claiming Google AI Falsely Linked Him to Fake News and Fake Crimes

"Such a win would establish a much-needed precedent for protections against unchecked, false, and damaging AI-generated content."

Robby Starbuck is suing Google for defamation.

The tenacious common-sense conservative who helped corporate America dismantle Diversity, Equity and Inclusion (DEI) announced the lawsuit last Wednesday on X. 

Starbuck is alleging that Google AI (Bard, Gemini & Gemma) had generated false criminal accusations against him because of his political views.

This has been happening since 2023, Starbuck wrote, and he’s got all of the receipts.

Google AI, he alleged, falsely accused him of “sexual assault, child rape, abuse, fraud, stalking, drug charges, and even saying I was in Epstein’s flight logs.”

“All 100% fake,” Starbuck explained.

“All generated by Google’s AI. I have ZERO criminal record or allegations.”

Worse, Starbuck alleges, “Google execs KNEW for 2 YEARS that this was happening.”

They knew, he argued, “because he had told them, and his lawyers had sent multiple cease and desist letters.”

Google’s AI, he added, “didn’t just lie — it built fake worlds to make its lies look real.”

The AI platform fabricated everything, he said.

“Fake victims. Fake medical and legal records, relationships, and fake news stories.”

“One of the most dystopian things,” Starbuck alleged, was “how dedicated their AI was to doubling down on the lies.”

“Google’s AI routinely cited fake sources by creating fake links to REAL media outlets and shows.”

This came “complete with fake headlines so readers would trust the information.”

“It would continue to do this even if you called the AI out for lying or sending fake links,” Starbuck stated.

He then alleged that Google AI was manufacturing the “elaborate” false narratives in a way that would best gain user trust.

Determined to win the defamation case, Starbuck said he was fighting the generative artificial intelligence’s falsehoods, so that “this can’t ever happen to anyone else.”

“Bias in AI is a very, VERY serious issue,” he remarked.

“If we don’t fix this now, we’re in big trouble. This can destroy lives, reputations, and livelihoods.”

“If we don’t win this fight, then you no longer control your reputation because AI will define who you are to the rest of the world.”

Under this shadow, “you’d better hope that the AI likes you.”

In essence, instead of Google’s AI identifying “deep fakes,” the system appears to be inventing them.

Case in point:

Alarmed, Bret Weinstein, professor and “progressive” outcast turned podcaster, responded in a video.

Starbuck’s complaints, he said, should be “taken at face value.”

“Imagine the future.”

AI will have the power to “shape our viewpoint on everything, and with that the ability to wreck people.”

“As bad as centralised banking, digital currencies and social credit scores are, this is next-level,” dystopianism.

Pointing out the significance of Starbuck’s lawsuit, Weinstein also said, “This is the start of the AI era. This is the only time we get to have this conversation.”

Starbuck’s factivism vs Silicon Valley’s apparent fake news activism isn’t the conservatives’ first legal duel with the technocracy.

Starbuck sued Meta earlier this year after the Meta AI falsely accused him of involvement in the January 6, 2021, Capitol riot.

At the time, lead counsel, Dhillon Law Group, in effect, argued that AI’s assertions turn Meta and Google into publishers.

In this case, “Meta acted with reckless disregard by continuing to publish these statements,” Starbuck’s lawyers stated.

This was even “after they were notified of their falsity and having the means to verify their accuracy.”

Meta settled, and the matter never advanced into establishing a hardline precedent for future protections against fake AI-generated “facts.”

As Krista Baughman, a partner for Dhillon Law group, said in December last year.

We need precedents that determine “whether this new technology will be held in the same speech standards we’ve long used to protect an individual’s reputation.”

Cui Bono?

Starbuck’s case against Google could be this urgently needed pioneering line in the sand.

If he wins, everyone benefits.

Such a win would establish a much-needed precedent for protections against unchecked, false, and damaging AI-generated content.

Especially from Artificial Intelligence platforms, which appear to be made in the image of joyless, Christian-hating, Western loathing, Wokeshivists.

AI being force-fed the tainted fruit of leftwing activism forces original sin into the technology.

Without mechanisms and safeguards against this implicit bias, AI will feed on depravity and destroy lives, not enhance them.

Special Request:

For nearly eight years, we've highlighted issues ignored by mainstream media and resisted globalist ideologies eroding Western civilization. We've done this joyfully, without paywalls, despite personal costs to our team. Your support has kept us going, but operating costs exceed donations, forcing us to use ads. We’d love to ditch them, so we’re asking for your help. If you value our work, please consider supporting us via Stripe or PayPal. Every bit helps us keep fighting for our kids’ future. Thank you!

What's New?

Use the blue arrows at the bottom to scroll through the latest.
Bible Sales Surge Continues in 2025 Amid Renewed Interest in Christianity

Bible Sales Surge Continues in 2025 Amid Renewed Interest in Christianity

"Industry estimates indicate Bible sales rose by approximately 11–15 per cent year over year in 2025, with about 18 million copies sold through late in the year."
By
by Staff WriterJan 8, 2026
Jelly Roll’s Remarkable Journey from Prison to Pardon & Saint Peter’s Basilica: “I’m a Redemption Guy” 

Jelly Roll’s Remarkable Journey from Prison to Pardon & Saint Peter’s Basilica: “I’m a Redemption Guy” 

“I think it's important for people to have a path to redemption.”
By
by Rod LampardJan 7, 2026
We Don’t Need A Royal Commission Into Antisemitism—We Need a Royal Commission Into Islamist Extremism and Immigration

We Don’t Need A Royal Commission Into Antisemitism—We Need a Royal Commission Into Islamist Extremism and Immigration

"If Australia is genuinely serious about preventing future attacks and restoring public safety, the inquiry we need is not into 'antisemitism' as an abstract social prejudice, but into immigration policy and Islamist radicalisation."
By
by Ben DavisJan 6, 2026
Scott Adams Says He Will Convert to Christianity Following Cancer Diagnosis

Scott Adams Says He Will Convert to Christianity Following Cancer Diagnosis

“I still have time, but my understanding is you’re never too late.”
By
by Staff WriterJan 5, 2026
How Mamdani Won Over Gen Z

How Mamdani Won Over Gen Z

"Politics is becoming less about the policy and more about the person."
By
by Selah CampisiJan 5, 2026
Remigration: A Moral Good?

Remigration: A Moral Good?

"If current mass migration trends continue, host nations will continue to fracture under cultural and economic strain, while their home nations remain stripped of youth, talent, and opportunity to rise above their underdeveloped state."
By
by Staff WriterJan 3, 2026
Christian Death Toll in Nigeria Could Double in 2026, Watchdog Warns

Christian Death Toll in Nigeria Could Double in 2026, Watchdog Warns

"More than 7,000 Christians were killed in the first 220 days of 2025, from January through August, averaging an estimated 30 to 35 deaths per day, alongside thousands of reported abductions."
By
by Staff WriterJan 2, 2026
The More Fragmented a Society, the Greater the State’s Power

The More Fragmented a Society, the Greater the State’s Power

"Fragmented societies provide the easiest and most reliable pathway to authoritarian rule. The chaos and disorder they generate invite tyranny as the only apparent solution."
By
by Ben DavisJan 1, 2026

Image

Support

If you value our work and would like to support us, you can do so by visiting our support page. Can’t find what you’re looking for? Visit our search page.

Copyright © 2025, Caldron Pool

Permissions

Everything published at Caldron Pool is protected by copyright and cannot be used and/or duplicated without prior written permission. Links and excerpts with full attribution are permitted. Published articles represent the opinions of the author and may not reflect the views of all contributors at Caldron Pool.

Caldron Pool does not condone the use of violence, threats, or intimidation for political or religious purposes. We strongly advocate for peaceful, respectful, and free communication and open debate without fear of reprisal or punishment.