Image

Richard Dawkins slammed after saying eugenics would “work” to improve human race

Atheist Richard Dawkins has been slammed on social media after suggesting that while a eugenics policy would be “bad”, it would “work” to improve the human race. On Sunday, Dawkins tweeted: “It’s one thing to deplore eugenics on ideological, political, moral grounds. It’s quite another to conclude that it wouldn’t work in practice. Of course it would. It works for cows, horses, pigs, dogs & roses. Why on earth wouldn’t it work for humans. Facts ignore ideology.” The tweet quickly attracted more than 8,000 responses, many scolding the outspoken atheist for suggesting a practice adopted by Nazi Germany would “work”.……

Atheist Richard Dawkins has been slammed on social media after suggesting that while a eugenics policy would be “bad”, it would “work” to improve the human race.

On Sunday, Dawkins tweeted: “It’s one thing to deplore eugenics on ideological, political, moral grounds. It’s quite another to conclude that it wouldn’t work in practice. Of course it would. It works for cows, horses, pigs, dogs & roses. Why on earth wouldn’t it work for humans. Facts ignore ideology.”

The tweet quickly attracted more than 8,000 responses, many scolding the outspoken atheist for suggesting a practice adopted by Nazi Germany would “work”.

Eight hours later Dawkins was forced to follow up the claim with further clarification, tweeting: “For those determined to miss the point, I deplore the idea of a eugenic policy. I simply said deploring it doesn’t mean it wouldn’t work. Just as we breed cows to yield more milk, we could breed humans to run faster or jump higher. But heaven forbid we should do it.”

Heaven forbid we should do it? Eugenics is “bad” and “deplorable”? But, according to what moral standard? It’s at this point that the atheist becomes undone. Here’s why:

If the atheist believes there is no God, then ultimately we’re nothing more than the unintentional chemical by-product of time and chance working on matter. And if that’s the case, then what one chemical does to another chemical is morally irrelevant.

The atheist may appeal to the “greater good of society”, but in doing so he’s still begging the question. What one chemical does to a larger collection of chemicals is also morally irrelevant. That’s because, according to the atheist, human action and behaviour is nothing more than the result of atomic motion in the brain obeying the fixed laws of chemistry.

So, by what moral standard does Dawkins deem eugenics “bad” and “deplorable”?

Douglas Wilson put it this way: “If there is no God, then the difference between your thoughts and mine correspond to the difference between shaking up a bottle of Mountain Dew and a bottle of Dr Pepper. You simply fizz atheistically and I fizz theistically.”

He continued, “This means that you don’t hold to atheism because it’s true, but rather because of a series of chemical reactions. Morality, tragedy, and sorrow are equally evanescent. They are all empty sensations created by the chemical reactions of the brain, in turn, created by too much pizza the night before.

“If there is no God, then all abstractions are chemical epiphenomena, like swamp gas over fetid water. This means that we have no reason to assign truth and falsity to the chemical fizz we call reasoning or right and wrong to the irrational reaction we call morality. If no God, mankind is a set of bi-pedal carbon units of mostly water. And nothing else,” he added.

So, while Dawkins may attempt to water-down his assertion by labelling eugenics “bad” and “deplorable”, in doing so, he now finds himself at odds with his self-professed atheism. But then again, consistency has never been a characteristic of atheism.

Twitter reacts:

Special Request:

For nearly eight years, we've highlighted issues ignored by mainstream media and resisted globalist ideologies eroding Western civilization. We've done this joyfully, without paywalls, despite personal costs to our team. Your support has kept us going, but operating costs exceed donations, forcing us to use ads. We’d love to ditch them, so we’re asking for your help. If you value our work, please consider supporting us via Stripe or PayPal. Every bit helps us keep fighting for our kids’ future. Thank you!

What's New?

Use the blue arrows at the bottom to scroll through the latest.
Revive the Faith, Restore the West—Visit Church This Easter

Revive the Faith, Restore the West—Visit Church This Easter

"If we want to restore a culture rooted in Christian values, we must first revive the church. The best way to do this is by filling the pews with faithful believers who are willing to carry on the legacy of those who came before us."
By
by Staff WriterApr 9, 2025
Government Employees Don’t Pay Income Tax

Government Employees Don’t Pay Income Tax

"When government employees are taxed by the same government that pays them, it's essentially a bookkeeping illusion, since their tax payments are just returned to their employer—the state."
By
by Staff WriterApr 9, 2025
UK Labour Cancels Grooming Gang Inquiries, Redirects £5M to Other Projects

UK Labour Cancels Grooming Gang Inquiries, Redirects £5M to Other Projects

“One of the victims was told by her rapist, ‘We’re here to f*** all the white girls and f*** the government.’”
By
by Staff WriterApr 9, 2025
UK Mother Jailed for Over 2 Years for Deleted Tweet Following Southport Massacre

UK Mother Jailed for Over 2 Years for Deleted Tweet Following Southport Massacre

"Requests for Connolly’s temporary release to support her family have been denied, with authorities citing concerns over public perception..."
By
by Staff WriterApr 9, 2025
There’s No Such Thing as a Religiously Neutral Society

There’s No Such Thing as a Religiously Neutral Society

"Absolute freedom is only possible in a lawless society. So, whether it is secularism or Christianity taking precedence, every alternative will be restrained at the point in which it conflicts with what the reigning system deems “good” for the wider society."
By
by Ben DavisApr 8, 2025
Is Christianity Jewish?

Is Christianity Jewish?

"The Church is neither Jewish nor Gentile, it is a new race, the third race."
By
by Matthew LittlefieldApr 8, 2025
Musk Warns Immigration Threatens National Identity: “A Country Is Its People”

Musk Warns Immigration Threatens National Identity: “A Country Is Its People”

"A country is its people. This is a fundamental concept that is truly obvious," Musk said.
By
by Staff WriterApr 7, 2025

Image

Support

If you value our work and would like to support us, you can do so by visiting our support page. Can’t find what you’re looking for? Visit our search page.

Copyright © 2025, Caldron Pool

Permissions

Everything published at Caldron Pool is protected by copyright and cannot be used and/or duplicated without prior written permission. Links and excerpts with full attribution are permitted. Published articles represent the opinions of the author and may not reflect the views of all contributors at Caldron Pool.

Caldron Pool does not condone the use of violence, threats, or intimidation for political or religious purposes. We strongly advocate for peaceful, respectful, and free communication and open debate without fear of reprisal or punishment.