Image

Over $200,000 Raised in Support of Sydney Police Officer After Conviction

So far, more than $216,000 has been raised.

More than $200,000 has been raised in public donations to support Sydney police officer Sergeant Benedict Bryant, following his conviction for dangerous driving causing death.

Sergeant Bryant was found guilty after a court ruled that an Indigenous teenager, riding a stolen bicycle, fatally collided with Bryant’s parked police vehicle. The verdict has prompted widespread concern among current and former police officers, as well as members of the public, many of whom are concerned about the precedent the absurd ruling sets.

The fundraising campaign was established by retired NSW Police Chief Inspector Paul Fownes APM OAM to help cover Bryant’s mounting legal costs. It marks the second such effort organised by Fownes. The first fundraiser, which attracted more than $57,000 in donations, was taken down within 24 hours by the hosting platform, with all funds refunded to donors. The platform cited a breach of its Terms of Service, specifically a clause prohibiting fundraising for the legal defence of criminal charges.

Sergeant Bryant has served with NSW Police since 1999 and has worked in Redfern since 2008. During his career, he has been involved in frontline policing in some of Sydney’s most challenging environments, mentoring younger officers and working closely with vulnerable members of the community.

The legal proceedings have placed a substantial financial burden on Bryant and his family. He supports his wife, two children, and his mother-in-law, who suffers from advanced dementia. To date, Bryant has personally spent approximately $130,000 on legal expenses, with further costs anticipated as he pursues an appeal and seeks to avoid more severe legal consequences.

According to the campaign organisers, Sergeant Bryant was unable to afford a jury trial at the outset due to the increased duration, cost, and risk of a mistrial. While the Police Association of NSW (PANSW) has indicated it will provide some ongoing assistance toward the appeal—given the broader implications of the case for its membership—organisers stress that Bryant’s personal legal costs will remain significant.

You can view the campaign and donate here.

Special Request:

For nearly eight years, we've highlighted issues ignored by mainstream media and resisted globalist ideologies eroding Western civilization. We've done this joyfully, without paywalls, despite personal costs to our team. Your support has kept us going, but operating costs exceed donations, forcing us to use ads. We’d love to ditch them, so we’re asking for your help. If you value our work, please consider supporting us via Stripe or PayPal. Every bit helps us keep fighting for our kids’ future. Thank you!

What's New?

Use the blue arrows at the bottom to scroll through the latest.
Hate Speech Laws Are Just Blasphemy Laws

Hate Speech Laws Are Just Blasphemy Laws

"Blasphemy laws protect a society’s sacred object from verbal violation. Hate speech laws do the same, only the sacred object has changed. They are secularism’s answer to blasphemy law: enforcing reverence for the system’s ultimate values while denying that those values are religious at all."
By
by Staff WriterJan 15, 2026
Opposition Grows to Labor’s “Horrendous” Hate Speech Bill: “Worst Assault on Freedom Yet”

Opposition Grows to Labor’s “Horrendous” Hate Speech Bill: “Worst Assault on Freedom Yet”

Opposition to the federal government’s Combating Antisemitism, Hate and Extremism Bill 2026 is mounting across multiple parties, with MPs and senators warning that the rushed, broadly worded legislation threatens free speech, religious freedom and civil liberties while failing to address the causes of extremism.
By
by Staff WriterJan 15, 2026
Democrats Want Trump’s War Powers Limited Over a War With Venezuela That Doesn’t Exist

Democrats Want Trump’s War Powers Limited Over a War With Venezuela That Doesn’t Exist

“This Vote greatly hampers American self-defence and National Security, impeding the President’s Authority as Commander in Chief,” Trump wrote.
By
by Rod LampardJan 14, 2026
True Leaders Inspire Unity, Weak Men Legislate It

True Leaders Inspire Unity, Weak Men Legislate It

"Heavy-handed laws, by contrast, are a symptom of weakness—a last resort when authority has decayed, and coercion is all that remains."
By
by Staff WriterJan 13, 2026
Australians Sound Alarm Over New Draconian “Hate” Bill

Australians Sound Alarm Over New Draconian “Hate” Bill

"The Parliamentary Joint Committee on Intelligence and Security has allowed less than 48 hours for public submissions on the 144-page draft bill."
By
by Staff WriterJan 13, 2026
Hate Speech Laws Are an Admission of Government Failure

Hate Speech Laws Are an Admission of Government Failure

"Hate speech laws are evidence that our governments can no longer inspire loyalty, trust, or solidarity. They are an admission that policymakers have no unifying vision capable of bringing diverse people together voluntarily. So instead, they use force."
By
by Ben DavisJan 13, 2026
UK Leads Talks With Canada and Australia on Potential X Ban

UK Leads Talks With Canada and Australia on Potential X Ban

"Free communication has always posed a problem for those who seek to centralise authority. Open platforms like X allow claims to be challenged, narratives to be contested, and power to be scrutinised. That is precisely why they become targets when governments feel uncomfortable, embarrassed, or threatened."
By
by Staff WriterJan 12, 2026
Self-Regulation or State Control: How Society’s Moral Collapse Hands Government Power

Self-Regulation or State Control: How Society’s Moral Collapse Hands Government Power

"Public degeneracy doesn’t just corrode society, it empowers the state. Once enough people normalise moral disorder, government intervention stops being the exception and becomes the rule."
By
by Staff WriterJan 10, 2026

Image

Support

If you value our work and would like to support us, you can do so by visiting our support page. Can’t find what you’re looking for? Visit our search page.

Copyright © 2025, Caldron Pool

Permissions

Everything published at Caldron Pool is protected by copyright and cannot be used and/or duplicated without prior written permission. Links and excerpts with full attribution are permitted. Published articles represent the opinions of the author and may not reflect the views of all contributors at Caldron Pool.

Caldron Pool does not condone the use of violence, threats, or intimidation for political or religious purposes. We strongly advocate for peaceful, respectful, and free communication and open debate without fear of reprisal or punishment.