Image

Neil Young Admits Misinformation Drove His Demands for Joe Rogan’s Cancellation

"The letter that prompted me to act on Spotify was written by 270 medical professionals, not doctors. I erroneously said they were doctors after having read disinformation on the internet."

Almost a month after riding the cancel culture freight train, Neil Young has admitted to using misinformation in his January ultimatum to Spotify.

The 60s rocker shot back into the headlines last month demanding the streaming service either cancel its exclusive contract with Joe Rogan or remove Young’s music.

Young issued the ultimatum after reading about an open letter in The Guardian and Rolling Stone accusing Spotify of ‘broadcasting false and societally harmful assertions.’

At least two reliable sources reported a recent update from Young, alleging that The Guardian and Rolling Stone had misled him, by asserting that all 260+ contributors to the open letter were doctors.

They weren’t.

The letter was signed by a ragtag mix of social scientists, podcast hosts, and medical students.

Signatories included three social workers, three psychiatrists, 79 professors, 218 nurses, 19 respiratory therapists, 10 speech pathologists, three writers, five psychologists and a number of physicians.

All of whom accuse Joe Rogan of being medically irresponsible for ‘promoting Ivermectin’ and hosting counter-COVID narrative rebels, Dr. Robert Malone and Dr. Peter McCollough.

In a now-deleted update posted to the Neil Young Archives, Young wrote:

“The letter that prompted me to act on Spotify was written by 270 medical professionals, not doctors. I erroneously said they were doctors after having read disinformation on the internet.”

Young added:

“About a third of them were doctors. But many of the rest were nurses and hospital assistants.”

He then said:

“I still support them. My mistake was calling them all doctors. I read and usually believe The Guardian and The Guardian made a rare mistake.”

Young exclaimed: “I was misinformed too!”

Guitar magazine said Young’s wording in the ultimatum was based on the Guardian’s original headline which, according to a UK music news site, read: “Menace to public health: 270 doctors criticise Spotify over Joe Rogan’s podcast.”

Rolling Stone ran with: “A menace to public health: Doctors demand Spotify puts an end to COVID Lies on Joe Rogan Experience”.

Young has since deleted the post admitting he was misled by legacy media’s COVID disinformation crusaders, along with the original post criticising Rogan.

He hasn’t retracted defamatory remarks made against Spotify, or adjusted misinformation of his own.

In another article, Young accused the company and its CEO of profiting from selling lies. He also labelled Spotify a “very damaging force via its public disinformation and lies about COVID.”

Additionally, despite Guitar magazine saying he has since “clarified his previous erroneous statement.”

Young hasn’t deleted, or updated assertions he now admits were false.

The January 26 article still contains misinformation about the anti-Rogan open letter which triggered Young’s ultimatum:  

“I first learned of this problem by reading that 200 plus doctors had joined forces, taking on the dangerous life-threatening COVID falsehoods found in SPOTIFY programming.”

Young’s alleged passion for “free speech” and concern about disinformation appears to be one-sided.

Buoyed by the front-page attention, Young is now conflating a very successful public relations manoeuvre against Spotify with catastrophising about the climate.

Such is the expected trajectory of leftists, as they seek to shift “COVID crisis” authoritarianism into “Climate crisis” Communism.

The battle over who can say what about COVID-19 will inevitably shift to a battle over who can say what about so-called “catastrophic climate change.”

In a February 7 piece, the musician name-drops “Climate Chaos.”

Young told boomers to lead the way by joining him in a boycott of American banks who “fund fossil fuels.”

Two things stand out.

He and his generation are the establishment.

The millionaire boomer even admits this by reasoning that baby boomers hold ‘70% of assets in the United States, [and therefore] have the power to change the world.’

This “down with the establishment” nostalgic trip back to the 60s makes Young seem old, opportunistic, out of date and confused.

Second, it all suggests Young has used Joe Rogan’s massive popularity to reignite his own.

Pushing Rogan down in order to pull himself up, has paid off. The musician’s virtue signalling ultimatum has been a public relations boon for the aging boomer.

As Variety outlined:

“Prior to Young first making noise about wanting off Spotify on Jan. 24, his daily on-demand streams in both audio and visual formats were tallying somewhere between a low of 550,000 and a high of 715,000, usually reliably landing in the 600,000s each day.

“The day after news of his ultimatum to Spotify broke, his total streams rose dramatically from 619,000 to 860,000, and the day after that, sharply again to 1,005,000.”

This all begs the question. Who has the most to gain from catastrophising about climate change and hyping up the COVID-19 crisis?

Is it Spotify, Rogan, or Young?

Special Request:

For nearly eight years, we've highlighted issues ignored by mainstream media and resisted globalist ideologies eroding Western civilization. We've done this joyfully, without paywalls, despite personal costs to our team. Your support has kept us going, but operating costs exceed donations, forcing us to use ads. We’d love to ditch them, so we’re asking for your help. If you value our work, please consider supporting us via Stripe or PayPal. Every bit helps us keep fighting for our kids’ future. Thank you!

What's New?

Use the blue arrows at the bottom to scroll through the latest.
Deeming Backs Smith After Pronoun Police Penalty: Refusing to Affirm a Lie Isn’t Dishonesty – It’s Courage!

Deeming Backs Smith After Pronoun Police Penalty: Refusing to Affirm a Lie Isn’t Dishonesty – It’s Courage!

“By supporting Kirralie, you’re really supporting every single Australian who wants to speak up in the future. This is especially so for women, because when one woman is punished for this, thousands of women are made silent.”
By
by Rod LampardDec 17, 2025
We Don’t Need Antisemitism Laws—We Need Anti-Australia Laws

We Don’t Need Antisemitism Laws—We Need Anti-Australia Laws

Australia does not need race-based antisemitism laws; it needs a pro-Australian legal framework that applies equally to all and punishes harmful conduct regardless of who commits it or who the victim is.
By
by Ben DavisDec 17, 2025
From “You Do You” to Leadership Coups: The Deadly Fruit of Post-Modernists in the Pulpit

From “You Do You” to Leadership Coups: The Deadly Fruit of Post-Modernists in the Pulpit

“Anyone who says that there are no truths, or that all truth is ‘merely relative,’ is asking you not to believe him. So don’t!”
By
by Rod LampardDec 16, 2025
Matt Walsh Slams Australian Government After Bondi Shooting

Matt Walsh Slams Australian Government After Bondi Shooting

"Rules are not enough. You also need to ensure that your country is full of people who are willing to follow those rules. And in that very important respect, Australia has clearly failed."
By
by Staff WriterDec 16, 2025
A Government Too Afraid to Name the Problem Can Never Fix It

A Government Too Afraid to Name the Problem Can Never Fix It

"Governments have become not only incapable but increasingly unwilling to acknowledge the simple and self-evident truth that some ideas are bad, and bad ideas inevitably produce bad behaviour."
By
by Ben DavisDec 16, 2025
16-Year-Old Explains Why the Social Media Ban Won’t Work

16-Year-Old Explains Why the Social Media Ban Won’t Work

"There are three very prominent concerns when it comes to how this law will actually work and the repercussions it could have."
By
by Selah CampisiDec 15, 2025
Bondi Massacre: A Wake-Up Call for Australia

Bondi Massacre: A Wake-Up Call for Australia

"Without honest discourse, decisive policy, and recognition that not all cultures can coexist harmoniously, such attacks are likely to recur—just look at Europe today."
By
by Staff WriterDec 15, 2025
White Guilt is Dead

White Guilt is Dead

"For decades, White guilt has been used as a tool of social control—silencing dissent, suppressing legitimate demographic concerns, and guilt-tripping Westerners into accepting policies that no other civilisation on earth would tolerate."
By
by Staff WriterDec 13, 2025

Image

Support

If you value our work and would like to support us, you can do so by visiting our support page. Can’t find what you’re looking for? Visit our search page.

Copyright © 2025, Caldron Pool

Permissions

Everything published at Caldron Pool is protected by copyright and cannot be used and/or duplicated without prior written permission. Links and excerpts with full attribution are permitted. Published articles represent the opinions of the author and may not reflect the views of all contributors at Caldron Pool.

Caldron Pool does not condone the use of violence, threats, or intimidation for political or religious purposes. We strongly advocate for peaceful, respectful, and free communication and open debate without fear of reprisal or punishment.