Image

Moderators Turn Trump vs. Harris Debate Into the Commie-La Monologues

"Moderators fact-checked Trump, and fact-checked none of what Harris said, and she lied repeatedly."

Moderators made mincemeat of what will likely be Donald Trump’s only debate with Kamala Harris.

Blatantly hostile ABC News hosts, David Muir and Linsey Davis, visibly favoured the Biden administration appointee.

Muir’s leading questions, and his outright interrogative statements, betrayed an obvious bias against Trump.

Davis’ “fact-checking” double standards was simply a double down on misdirection.

Giving Harris a free ride, moderators communicated an obvious unwillingness to hold the Marxist Vice President accountable to the same apparent standard they were applying to Trump.

Muir and Davis let Harris’ lies slide.

Such as the “very fine people” hoax, Project 2025, Democrat disinformation about abortion, false claims about climate change, and January 6.

In the end, Trump wasn’t just debating Harris, he was unexpectedly forced to defend himself against attacks from the ABC.

Every time Trump scored big, the moderators moved the debate along.

After Trump landed a significant counter-punch, rightly stating that Democrat rhetoric helped “put a bullet in his head,” Muir reshuffled the already stacked deck.

Then when Trump delivered a knockout blow, cornering Harris on abortion up to birth, the discussion was met with a quick diversion, and Davis’ counter-accusations.

When Trump pinned Kamala, and company down on false claims about “insurrection,” by contrasting J6 with the destruction of Black Lives Matter, and Antifa rioters, Muir and Davis deployed misdirection.

This happened over, and over again.

What was advertised as fair play, was in truth, the ABC playing defence for the current administration.

Furiously protesting the one-sided moderation, independent media megastar, Megan Kelly, shared her thoughts,  stating, “ABC News is run by, Dana Walton – the guy responsible for Harris and her husband meeting.”

Muir and Davis “did Walton’s bidding tonight,” she argued.

The debate “was three against one.”

“Trump did the best he could under the circumstances,” even though he was outnumbered.

“He tried to take the all on. He did fine, even though he was thrown a few times when he was unnecessarily defensive.”

Trump was “getting angry, and so was I,” Kelly exclaimed.

“Trusting ABC News with this debate was a mistake,” she added.

“Republicans must learn from this, the same way Democrats never agree to do anything with moderators they don’t entirely trust.”

“This should be the last time Republicans ever do this because those two moderators tried to sink Donald Trump tonight.”

They, Megan continued, “fact-checked him, and fact-checked none of what Harris said, and she lied repeatedly.”

Robert F. Kennedy Jnr. also weighed in, saying the “moderators were clearly biased.”

They were “constantly fact-checking Donald Trump and none of these whoppers the Vice President was dropping.”

The ABC moderators, RFK Jnr said, didn’t call on her to explain inconsistencies.

They “simply sat there on the sidelines and allowed that to pass.”

Swimming superstar, and outspoken LGBTrans critic, Riley Gaines, noted, “Not even 2 months ago the former President was shot in the head in an assassination attempt and the moderators didn’t bring it up ONCE. You realize how deliberate and insane that is, right?”

William Wolfe quipped, “I’m still surprised the moderators didn’t give their own closing statements.”

In a CNN video of undecided voter responses to the debate, being shared widely on X, one female voter explained, “We need to remember that we’re voting for the leader of our country, and not who we like the most, or who we want in our wedding party.”

We’re “voting for who is actually going to make our country better.”

Both candidates have been in office. We’ve “gotten to see what they would do.

“When facts come to facts, my life was better when Trump was in office,” she said.

As Australia’s own, Miranda Divine concluded, “Trump came across as serious and resolute. Harris’ haughty split-screen pantomime came across as unserious and unlikeable.”

“It goes without saying that the ABC was a disgrace.”

The debate bottom line:

If Americans want a Commander in Chief, vote Trump.

If they want to be “mothered,” vote Kamala.

It’s MAGA vs. Marxism.

Despite biased moderators turning the presidential debate into the Commie-La Harris monologues, Trump ran a strong defence.

Contrary to the consensus, I don’t think he lost the debate.

Trump did all could do, given the moderators shielded Harris, by harassing him.

Special Request:

For nearly eight years, we've highlighted issues ignored by mainstream media and resisted globalist ideologies eroding Western civilization. We've done this joyfully, without paywalls, despite personal costs to our team. Your support has kept us going, but operating costs exceed donations, forcing us to use ads. We’d love to ditch them, so we’re asking for your help. If you value our work, please consider supporting us via Stripe or PayPal. Every bit helps us keep fighting for our kids’ future. Thank you!

What's New?

Use the blue arrows at the bottom to scroll through the latest.
Matt Walsh Slams Australian Government After Bondi Shooting

Matt Walsh Slams Australian Government After Bondi Shooting

"Rules are not enough. You also need to ensure that your country is full of people who are willing to follow those rules. And in that very important respect, Australia has clearly failed."
By
by Staff WriterDec 16, 2025
A Government Too Afraid to Name the Problem Can Never Fix It

A Government Too Afraid to Name the Problem Can Never Fix It

"Governments have become not only incapable but increasingly unwilling to acknowledge the simple and self-evident truth that some ideas are bad, and bad ideas inevitably produce bad behaviour."
By
by Ben DavisDec 16, 2025
16-Year-Old Explains Why the Social Media Ban Won’t Work

16-Year-Old Explains Why the Social Media Ban Won’t Work

"There are three very prominent concerns when it comes to how this law will actually work and the repercussions it could have."
By
by Selah CampisiDec 15, 2025
Bondi Massacre: A Wake-Up Call for Australia

Bondi Massacre: A Wake-Up Call for Australia

"Without honest discourse, decisive policy, and recognition that not all cultures can coexist harmoniously, such attacks are likely to recur—just look at Europe today."
By
by Staff WriterDec 15, 2025
White Guilt is Dead

White Guilt is Dead

"For decades, White guilt has been used as a tool of social control—silencing dissent, suppressing legitimate demographic concerns, and guilt-tripping Westerners into accepting policies that no other civilisation on earth would tolerate."
By
by Staff WriterDec 13, 2025
Brave New Families: How State Power Is Replacing Parental Responsibility

Brave New Families: How State Power Is Replacing Parental Responsibility

“All I see is the dystopian Brave New future that are projections of our simplistic mechanistic leaders, which makes sense, given their godfather is Karl Marx, a determinist who has bred many of his kind after his image.”
By
by Dr Stephen FysonDec 12, 2025
When the State Becomes Co-Parent: Australia’s Intrusion into Family Life

When the State Becomes Co-Parent: Australia’s Intrusion into Family Life

"As the state once absorbed the moral and spiritual leadership of the Church over society, so too can it absorb the moral and spiritual authority of parents over their children."
By
by Staff WriterDec 11, 2025
Tarantino Ranks ‘The Passion of the Christ’ Among the Best Films of the Century

Tarantino Ranks ‘The Passion of the Christ’ Among the Best Films of the Century

“I think it actually is one of the most brilliant visual storytelling films ever made,” he said.
By
by Rod LampardDec 11, 2025

Image

Support

If you value our work and would like to support us, you can do so by visiting our support page. Can’t find what you’re looking for? Visit our search page.

Copyright © 2025, Caldron Pool

Permissions

Everything published at Caldron Pool is protected by copyright and cannot be used and/or duplicated without prior written permission. Links and excerpts with full attribution are permitted. Published articles represent the opinions of the author and may not reflect the views of all contributors at Caldron Pool.

Caldron Pool does not condone the use of violence, threats, or intimidation for political or religious purposes. We strongly advocate for peaceful, respectful, and free communication and open debate without fear of reprisal or punishment.