Image

Mike Johnson Backs Bannon: J6 “Insurrection” Committee Is Illegitimate

"The J6 committee suppressed key pieces of evidence, cherry-picked evidence that supported their narrative, and played a 20-million-dollar blame game to frame President Trump and Republicans."

The current Republican speaker of the United States House of Representatives, Mike Johnson, will back Steve Bannon.

Johnson told Sean Hannity that House Republicans are “working on filing an amicus brief” to help the former Trump aid fend off Biden DOJ’s January 6 contempt case against him.

Johnson said, “The January 6 committee was wrongly constituted.

“We think the work was tainted. We think they may have very covered-up evidence and maybe even more nefarious activities.

“We’ve been investigating the committee itself,” he said, adding, “We disagree with how [Nancy] Pelosi put all that together.

“We think it violated House rules, and so, we’ll be expressing that to the court.

“I think,” he added, “it will help Steve Bannon and his appeal.”

Speaking with CNN, Johnson doubled down, stating, “We think it’s important to file the brief.

“The previous statement under Nancy Pelosi was incorrect. We do not believe the J6 special committee followed the rules.”

Commenting on their own investigation, Johnson said, the covering up of evidence is “very concerning.”

“When they’re using that to prosecute people, we think it’s important for the House’s position to be known.”

J6 wasn’t a “proper committee doing appropriate work,” he added.

In Bannon’s case, he said, “We think the court should take that into consideration.”

After losing appeals before the circuit court, Steve Bannon’s lawyers put forward a sharply worded appeal to the Supreme Court on Friday.

In the filing (which can be read here) Bannon’s team argued precedent, on the grounds that executive privilege was being compromised.

If a sitting government can abuse their power in this way – by putting Bannon behind bars – there’s nothing stopping the opposing party from doing the same.

“The Court should also be mindful of the [Biden] government’s own conduct when it comes to congressional subpoenas.

“Congress recently issued subpoenas to DOJ regarding Hunter Biden, yet DOJ instructed its Tax Division lawyers to refuse to comply.”

Bannon’s lawyers then argued, “‘Jail for thee, not for me’ is hardly an acceptable position for the government.”

“The government stated below that ‘equal justice under the law’ and an ‘even-handed application of the bail statute’ required promptly imprisoning Mr. Bannon.

“Such aphorisms ring hollow when DOJ itself ignores House subpoenas and faces no repercussions.”

The Supreme Court should, they wrote, step in and “shut down this pandora’s box.”

Responding to Johnson’s backing, Bannon’s War Room expanded insight into investigations into the J6 committee.

WR confirmed Johnson’s concerns by citing Barry Loudermilk.

Loudermilk, chair of the House subcommittee investigating the J6 committee, said they’d gone over every scrap of evidence.

They found that J6’s interrogation bureaucrats, “were not completely truthful with the American people.”

Outlining his damning review, Loudermilk added, “Liz Cheney and Bennie Thompson had little regard for House rules and no regard for transparency.

“The J6 committee suppressed key pieces of evidence, cherry-picked evidence that supported their narrative, and played a 20-million-dollar blame game to frame President Trump and Republicans,” he concluded.

Propping up Bannon’s chances, the Bipartisan Legal Advisory Group (BLAG) – made up of the Speaker, majority and minority leaderships – voted 3-2, declaring the J6 ‘insurrection’ committee, and all its subpoenas as illegitimate.’

The overall Democrat political manoeuvre against Bannon is convenient.

Bannon will serve a four-month sentence, effectively removing him from directly campaigning for Donald Trump’s 2024 rerun against Joe Biden.

The sentence also gags Bannon.

He won’t be able to comment on, report about, or speak to the election from his War Room media platform.

Special Request:

For nearly eight years, we've highlighted issues ignored by mainstream media and resisted globalist ideologies eroding Western civilization. We've done this joyfully, without paywalls, despite personal costs to our team. Your support has kept us going, but operating costs exceed donations, forcing us to use ads. We’d love to ditch them, so we’re asking for your help. If you value our work, please consider supporting us via Stripe or PayPal. Every bit helps us keep fighting for our kids’ future. Thank you!

What's New?

Use the blue arrows at the bottom to scroll through the latest.
I Went to a Restaurant Yesterday and You Won’t Believe What Happened

I Went to a Restaurant Yesterday and You Won’t Believe What Happened

If we wouldn't tolerate it from a restaurant...
By
by Staff WriterJun 19, 2025
Cruz: “Biblically, We’re Commanded to Support Israel”

Cruz: “Biblically, We’re Commanded to Support Israel”

Is support for modern Israel a biblical mandate based on God’s promises to Abraham?
By
by Ben DavisJun 19, 2025
NSW Nats Torch Net Zero, Ditch Carbon Zero’s Crippling Con

NSW Nats Torch Net Zero, Ditch Carbon Zero’s Crippling Con

“Net zero has done nothing but push up the price of everything. It has done ZERO for the environment because other countries are ignoring their commitments," Senator Matt Canavan said.
By
by Rod LampardJun 19, 2025
Decriminalising Abortion Shifts the Right to Life from God to the State

Decriminalising Abortion Shifts the Right to Life from God to the State

"By legalising abortion, we are not just allowing the state to regulate life and death; we are redefining rights as privileges that can be granted and revoked by government, not as inherent gifts from God."
By
by Ben DavisJun 18, 2025
Baptist Perspectives on What Constitutes Israel

Baptist Perspectives on What Constitutes Israel

Who are the true recipients of God's covenant promises to Israel—ethnic Israel or those who are in Christ?
By
by Tim GrantJun 18, 2025
Has the Church Replaced Israel?

Has the Church Replaced Israel?

The nature of the relationship between Israel and the Church has been the subject of much misunderstanding and debate.
By
by Ben DavisJun 17, 2025
Mel Gibson: LA’s Open Borders Violence Is the Result of “Destructive Democrat Decision-Making”

Mel Gibson: LA’s Open Borders Violence Is the Result of “Destructive Democrat Decision-Making”

“We need to make our voices heard, as a community,” Gibson asserted, “because it’s clear that our elected officials don’t seem to give a damn.”
By
by Rod LampardJun 17, 2025
Bureaucrats Target Tutoring Startup After Homeschooling Surge

Bureaucrats Target Tutoring Startup After Homeschooling Surge

“Over half of our Victorian families withdrew from our programs, not because we failed them, but because they feared the system would punish them for accessing support.”
By
by Rod LampardJun 16, 2025

Image

Support

If you value our work and would like to support us, you can do so by visiting our support page. Can’t find what you’re looking for? Visit our search page.

Copyright © 2025, Caldron Pool

Permissions

Everything published at Caldron Pool is protected by copyright and cannot be used and/or duplicated without prior written permission. Links and excerpts with full attribution are permitted. Published articles represent the opinions of the author and may not reflect the views of all contributors at Caldron Pool.

Caldron Pool does not condone the use of violence, threats, or intimidation for political or religious purposes. We strongly advocate for peaceful, respectful, and free communication and open debate without fear of reprisal or punishment.