Image

Marketing Genius: Nestlé Accuses Itself of Racism

NESTLE yesterday took the unprecedented step of complaining that its own product was racist, after seeing the publicity other companies got when accused of racism. Company spokeswoman, Candy Crush, told reporters she was “deeply sorry” no-one had been offended by their raspberry-flavoured Redskin confectionery. “Because Redskins are only sold in Australia and New Zealand there…


NESTLE yesterday took the unprecedented step of complaining that its own product was racist, after seeing the publicity other companies got when accused of racism.

Company spokeswoman, Candy Crush, told reporters she was “deeply sorry” no-one had been offended by their raspberry-flavoured Redskin confectionery.

“Because Redskins are only sold in Australia and New Zealand there has been no outrage from American Indians at all,” she said. “And for that, we are deeply sorry.”

It is believed anger about the iconic lolly’s name began last week – not among American Indians, who had never heard of the chewy sweet, but among staff in the company’s marketing department.

“Our team saw the national coverage Colonial Brewing got when they were accused of racism,” Ms Crush said. “It certainly triggered us. We were suddenly woke to the idea that our brand would be just as offensive if anyone was actually offended.

Ms Crush said Nestle executives hoped the Black Lives Matter movement would inspire a Red Lives Matter protest against their product, sparking a media frenzy.

But when Australians proved too sensible for that, the company decided it’s confectionary needed confected outrage.

“We take outrage over racism very seriously,” a stern Ms Crush told assembled media. “And so we thought, in the absence of any outrage, the only option left was for us was to be outraged at ourselves.”

Ms Crush said not everyone at Nestle was comfortable with the idea.

“Our chiefs had reservations,” she said.

“But our marketing team convinced them the product name was out of step with our values which are rooted in respect and boosting sales.”

Ms Crush said she didn’t know the background of why the Australian-made product had been given its name.

“I have no idea whether there were actual racial undertones or not,” she said. “But for the sake of the news, let’s just say there probably were because the one thing we can agree on is that everyone from the past was racist.

“I really want to emphasise that this is our moment of growth and respect and that we acknowledge our need to learn and to listen and to be on a journey and, you know, all that wokie stuff.”

Television and radio news bulletins all ran the story that Nestle was cancelling the Redskin name amid concerns it mocked Indian Americans.

The brand immediately started trending on twitter as people pledged to buy the company’s product in a show of support for the name.

“This decision to cancel the iconic Redskin brand acknowledges the need to ensure that nothing we do marginalises our friends, neighbours and colleagues – whilst taking full advantage of the incredible marketing opportunities presented by cancel culture,” Ms Crush said.

Packaging for the ‘Red Skins’ lollies previously featured a photo and cartoon of Native Americans, which were removed in the 1990s.

Ms Crush said a new product name would come later. “We want to soak up this moment first,” she said with a broad smile.

The Caldron Pool Show

The Caldron Pool Show: #43 – The Voice: Yes or No?
The Caldron Pool Show: #27 – God and Politics – with Joel Webbon
The Caldron Pool Show: #6 – Lauren Southern (Canada Special)
The Caldron Pool Show: #34 What is Christian Nationalism? (with Doug Wilson)

Image

Support

If you value our work and would like to support us, you can do so by visiting our support page. Can’t find what you’re looking for? Visit our search page.

Copyright © 2024, Caldron Pool

Permissions

Everything published at Caldron Pool is protected by copyright and cannot be used and/or duplicated without prior written permission. Links and excerpts with full attribution are permitted. Published articles represent the opinions of the author and may not reflect the views of all contributors at Caldron Pool.