Image

Marketing Genius: Nestlé Accuses Itself of Racism

NESTLE yesterday took the unprecedented step of complaining that its own product was racist, after seeing the publicity other companies got when accused of racism. Company spokeswoman, Candy Crush, told reporters she was “deeply sorry” no-one had been offended by their raspberry-flavoured Redskin confectionery. “Because Redskins are only sold in Australia and New Zealand there has been no outrage from American Indians at all,” she said. “And for that, we are deeply sorry.” It is believed anger about the iconic lolly’s name began last week – not among American Indians, who had never heard of the chewy sweet, but among……

NESTLE yesterday took the unprecedented step of complaining that its own product was racist, after seeing the publicity other companies got when accused of racism.

Company spokeswoman, Candy Crush, told reporters she was “deeply sorry” no-one had been offended by their raspberry-flavoured Redskin confectionery.

“Because Redskins are only sold in Australia and New Zealand there has been no outrage from American Indians at all,” she said. “And for that, we are deeply sorry.”

It is believed anger about the iconic lolly’s name began last week – not among American Indians, who had never heard of the chewy sweet, but among staff in the company’s marketing department.

“Our team saw the national coverage Colonial Brewing got when they were accused of racism,” Ms Crush said. “It certainly triggered us. We were suddenly woke to the idea that our brand would be just as offensive if anyone was actually offended.

Ms Crush said Nestle executives hoped the Black Lives Matter movement would inspire a Red Lives Matter protest against their product, sparking a media frenzy.

But when Australians proved too sensible for that, the company decided it’s confectionary needed confected outrage.

“We take outrage over racism very seriously,” a stern Ms Crush told assembled media. “And so we thought, in the absence of any outrage, the only option left was for us was to be outraged at ourselves.”

Ms Crush said not everyone at Nestle was comfortable with the idea.

“Our chiefs had reservations,” she said.

“But our marketing team convinced them the product name was out of step with our values which are rooted in respect and boosting sales.”

Ms Crush said she didn’t know the background of why the Australian-made product had been given its name.

“I have no idea whether there were actual racial undertones or not,” she said. “But for the sake of the news, let’s just say there probably were because the one thing we can agree on is that everyone from the past was racist.

“I really want to emphasise that this is our moment of growth and respect and that we acknowledge our need to learn and to listen and to be on a journey and, you know, all that wokie stuff.”

Television and radio news bulletins all ran the story that Nestle was cancelling the Redskin name amid concerns it mocked Indian Americans.

The brand immediately started trending on twitter as people pledged to buy the company’s product in a show of support for the name.

“This decision to cancel the iconic Redskin brand acknowledges the need to ensure that nothing we do marginalises our friends, neighbours and colleagues – whilst taking full advantage of the incredible marketing opportunities presented by cancel culture,” Ms Crush said.

Packaging for the ‘Red Skins’ lollies previously featured a photo and cartoon of Native Americans, which were removed in the 1990s.

Ms Crush said a new product name would come later. “We want to soak up this moment first,” she said with a broad smile.

Special Request:

For nearly eight years, we've highlighted issues ignored by mainstream media and resisted globalist ideologies eroding Western civilization. We've done this joyfully, without paywalls, despite personal costs to our team. Your support has kept us going, but operating costs exceed donations, forcing us to use ads. We’d love to ditch them, so we’re asking for your help. If you value our work, please consider supporting us via Stripe or PayPal. Every bit helps us keep fighting for our kids’ future. Thank you!

What's New?

Use the blue arrows at the bottom to scroll through the latest.
16-Year-Old Explains Why the Social Media Ban Won’t Work

16-Year-Old Explains Why the Social Media Ban Won’t Work

"There are three very prominent concerns when it comes to how this law will actually work and the repercussions it could have."
By
by Selah CampisiDec 15, 2025
Bondi Massacre: A Wake-Up Call for Australia

Bondi Massacre: A Wake-Up Call for Australia

"Without honest discourse, decisive policy, and recognition that not all cultures can coexist harmoniously, such attacks are likely to recur—just look at Europe today."
By
by Staff WriterDec 15, 2025
White Guilt is Dead

White Guilt is Dead

"For decades, White guilt has been used as a tool of social control—silencing dissent, suppressing legitimate demographic concerns, and guilt-tripping Westerners into accepting policies that no other civilisation on earth would tolerate."
By
by Staff WriterDec 13, 2025
Brave New Families: How State Power Is Replacing Parental Responsibility

Brave New Families: How State Power Is Replacing Parental Responsibility

“All I see is the dystopian Brave New future that are projections of our simplistic mechanistic leaders, which makes sense, given their godfather is Karl Marx, a determinist who has bred many of his kind after his image.”
By
by Dr Stephen FysonDec 12, 2025
When the State Becomes Co-Parent: Australia’s Intrusion into Family Life

When the State Becomes Co-Parent: Australia’s Intrusion into Family Life

"As the state once absorbed the moral and spiritual leadership of the Church over society, so too can it absorb the moral and spiritual authority of parents over their children."
By
by Staff WriterDec 11, 2025
Tarantino Ranks ‘The Passion of the Christ’ Among the Best Films of the Century

Tarantino Ranks ‘The Passion of the Christ’ Among the Best Films of the Century

“I think it actually is one of the most brilliant visual storytelling films ever made,” he said.
By
by Rod LampardDec 11, 2025
Truth Tax: Senate Dissenters Reject Albo’s FOI Amendments as a “Hubris-Driven Attack on Transparency”

Truth Tax: Senate Dissenters Reject Albo’s FOI Amendments as a “Hubris-Driven Attack on Transparency”

"The consensus from dissenters seems to be that this bill further distances the Australian government from the people its representatives are elected to serve."
By
by Rod LampardDec 10, 2025
Speech Rejected, Promiscuity Approved

Speech Rejected, Promiscuity Approved

"The question arises, while Candace Owens' verbalising conservative values is not in our nation's interest, Lily Philips' sleeping around with Australian men is?"
By
by Selah CampisiDec 9, 2025

Image

Support

If you value our work and would like to support us, you can do so by visiting our support page. Can’t find what you’re looking for? Visit our search page.

Copyright © 2025, Caldron Pool

Permissions

Everything published at Caldron Pool is protected by copyright and cannot be used and/or duplicated without prior written permission. Links and excerpts with full attribution are permitted. Published articles represent the opinions of the author and may not reflect the views of all contributors at Caldron Pool.

Caldron Pool does not condone the use of violence, threats, or intimidation for political or religious purposes. We strongly advocate for peaceful, respectful, and free communication and open debate without fear of reprisal or punishment.