Image

Mark Houck Acquitted

"They were trying to scare pro-lifers from coming out on the sidewalks, and being active."

Pro-life dad, Mark Houck has been acquitted.

A trial by jury found the father of seven not guilty of breaching the 1994 FACE act during an altercation provoked by 73-year-old Bruce Love.

In a video of the incident, Love, an abortion “escort” volunteer with Planned Parenthood, can be seen charging at Houck on a public walkway.

Houck, 49, was outside the “safe access” zone (SAZ), with his son when the apparent breach of laws protecting the practice of abortion occurred.

Court testimony quoted by The Daily Wire, recalled Houck’s son saying, “Love was at an arm’s length distance, saying, “Your dad’s a bad person. Your dad’s harassing women” and so I moved away… because I was scared.”

The abortion activist refused Houck’s requests to stop targeting his son with abuse, which led to Houck pushing the abortion “escort” away.

Love then fell backwards landing on the sidewalk.

The acquittal is contra to the Biden administration’s heavy-handed prosecution of the pro-life advocate.

Houck was arrested and then charged with two separate counts of breaching the FACE act, in the early hours of Friday morning in September last year.

Guns out, an anti-terror FBI SWAT team terrorised the Houck family, swarming their home, in what was a politically motivated attempt by the Biden White House to intimidate the pro-life movement, post-Roe V. Wade.

Both charges concerned Houck pushing Bruce Love, which the prosecution’s prejudiced version of events, alleged that Houck had ‘interfered with a so-called volunteer abortion patient escort.’

If convicted, Houck faced up to 11 years in federal prison.

Defending Houck, the Thomas More Society, counter-argued, “he is innocent of these lawless charges, and we intend to prove that in court.

“He had a one-off altercation with a man who harassed Houck’s minor son, approximately 100 feet from the abortion business and across the street.”

TMS delivered.

Chief litigator, Peter Breen argued the FACE act does not “‘”cover disputes between advocates on the public sidewalks outside of our nation’s abortion clinics.”

Breen, quoting Democrat, Ted Kennedy, one of the architects of the Freedom of Access to Clinic Entrances Act, obliterated the prosecution’s case by reminding them, “Clinic escorts are excluded, because they do not provide reproductive health services in a facility, as required under the FACE Act.”

Backed by the facts, Breen asserted, “[This proves the] Biden Department of Justice’s prosecution of Mark Houck is pure harassment, meant solely to intimidate our nation’s pro-life sidewalk counsellors who provide vital resources to help pregnant women at risk for abortion.”

Houck’s defence, questioned the CEO of Planned Parenthood Southeastern Pennsylvania, Dayle Steinberg, who ‘conceded,’ that Bruce Love was in violation of Planned Parenthood’s own non-engagement rules.

Steinberg also suspended Love after the incident.

Updates from the case posted by TMS, recalled Love, admitting under cross-examination,  

“Mark’s sidewalk counselling activities were fully legal and proper, and if Love hadn’t initiated the confrontations, they would not have happened at all.”

After Houck’s acquittal, Breen further described the DOJ’s prosecution of the pro-life dad as “abusive,” adding, “the FBI raid on his home back in September was “absolutely outrageous.”

Outside the court, Houck took to prayer, thanked God, and then prayed for his accusers.

The political persecution of the pro-life movement is as clear as day.

This includes the kid-gloves treatment of far-left extremism by the Woke desk jockeys in the White House’s justice department.

A Family Research Council report covered by Caldron Pool in December exposed the inconsistency in how the DOJ treats pro-abortion criminals versus their pro-life victims. (See here)

It’s worth restating that this double standard is not the exception, it’s the rule.

Houck’s victory is a massive blow to this double standard.

It also puts a huge thorn in the side of the Biden administration’s sinister posturing to its voter base, militarising the government to enforce the violent termination of an unborn child’s life in the womb.

Talking with Hannity, Breen said, “They were trying to scare pro-lifers from coming out on the sidewalks, and being active. Biden’s DOJ sent their best prosecutor – the top guy for FACE prosecutions – to help deal with the case. Once the jury was properly seated, it took them about an hour to find Mark not guilty.”

Special Request:

For nearly eight years, we've highlighted issues ignored by mainstream media and resisted globalist ideologies eroding Western civilization. We've done this joyfully, without paywalls, despite personal costs to our team. Your support has kept us going, but operating costs exceed donations, forcing us to use ads. We’d love to ditch them, so we’re asking for your help. If you value our work, please consider supporting us via Stripe or PayPal. Every bit helps us keep fighting for our kids’ future. Thank you!

What's New?

Use the blue arrows at the bottom to scroll through the latest.
16-Year-Old Explains Why the Social Media Ban Won’t Work

16-Year-Old Explains Why the Social Media Ban Won’t Work

"There are three very prominent concerns when it comes to how this law will actually work and the repercussions it could have."
By
by Selah CampisiDec 15, 2025
Bondi Massacre: A Wake-Up Call for Australia

Bondi Massacre: A Wake-Up Call for Australia

"Without honest discourse, decisive policy, and recognition that not all cultures can coexist harmoniously, such attacks are likely to recur—just look at Europe today."
By
by Staff WriterDec 15, 2025
White Guilt is Dead

White Guilt is Dead

"For decades, White guilt has been used as a tool of social control—silencing dissent, suppressing legitimate demographic concerns, and guilt-tripping Westerners into accepting policies that no other civilisation on earth would tolerate."
By
by Staff WriterDec 13, 2025
Brave New Families: How State Power Is Replacing Parental Responsibility

Brave New Families: How State Power Is Replacing Parental Responsibility

“All I see is the dystopian Brave New future that are projections of our simplistic mechanistic leaders, which makes sense, given their godfather is Karl Marx, a determinist who has bred many of his kind after his image.”
By
by Dr Stephen FysonDec 12, 2025
When the State Becomes Co-Parent: Australia’s Intrusion into Family Life

When the State Becomes Co-Parent: Australia’s Intrusion into Family Life

"As the state once absorbed the moral and spiritual leadership of the Church over society, so too can it absorb the moral and spiritual authority of parents over their children."
By
by Staff WriterDec 11, 2025
Tarantino Ranks ‘The Passion of the Christ’ Among the Best Films of the Century

Tarantino Ranks ‘The Passion of the Christ’ Among the Best Films of the Century

“I think it actually is one of the most brilliant visual storytelling films ever made,” he said.
By
by Rod LampardDec 11, 2025
Truth Tax: Senate Dissenters Reject Albo’s FOI Amendments as a “Hubris-Driven Attack on Transparency”

Truth Tax: Senate Dissenters Reject Albo’s FOI Amendments as a “Hubris-Driven Attack on Transparency”

"The consensus from dissenters seems to be that this bill further distances the Australian government from the people its representatives are elected to serve."
By
by Rod LampardDec 10, 2025
Speech Rejected, Promiscuity Approved

Speech Rejected, Promiscuity Approved

"The question arises, while Candace Owens' verbalising conservative values is not in our nation's interest, Lily Philips' sleeping around with Australian men is?"
By
by Selah CampisiDec 9, 2025

Image

Support

If you value our work and would like to support us, you can do so by visiting our support page. Can’t find what you’re looking for? Visit our search page.

Copyright © 2025, Caldron Pool

Permissions

Everything published at Caldron Pool is protected by copyright and cannot be used and/or duplicated without prior written permission. Links and excerpts with full attribution are permitted. Published articles represent the opinions of the author and may not reflect the views of all contributors at Caldron Pool.

Caldron Pool does not condone the use of violence, threats, or intimidation for political or religious purposes. We strongly advocate for peaceful, respectful, and free communication and open debate without fear of reprisal or punishment.