Image

Judge Rules AHPRA’s Suspension of COVID Critic Dr William Bay as Politically Motivated and Biased

“Dr Bay won reinstatement as a doctor after a judge damned the state branch of the national governing medical body AHPRA as biased, combative, and politically motivated.”

Last week soared with a series of wins against witch hunts.

First was Daniel Penny’s acquittal in the United States, this continued with the complete, and total vindication of Moira Deeming, and ended with Dr William Bay’s well-earned exoneration.

Dr Bay won reinstatement as a doctor after a judge damned the state branch of the national governing medical body AHPRA as “biased, combative, and politically motivated.”

In his 27-page ruling, Queensland Judge Bradley J. voided APHRA’s 2022 suspension of Dr Bay, stating that its reasons for suspending the GP had no direct relationship to his clinical practice.

All five complaints targeted “Dr Bay’s conduct at political meetings, in online political broadcasts, or at political protests or demonstrations,” Judge Bradley concluded.

Not one of the complaints proved APHRA’s “allegations that Dr Bay had or was providing any clinical services that failed to meet the applicable professional standards.”

Judge Bradley then chastised APHRA for effectively weaponizing the “Code of Conduct.”

He said APHRA’s allegation that Dr Bay had ‘contravened relevant legislation was “baseless.”

COVID measures did not “authorise the board to ‘abrogate the right of persons,” abdicate due diligence, or deny Dr Bay due process.

These powers, he asserted, did not “extend the Board’s regulatory role to include protection of government and regulatory agencies from political criticism.”

Damning the medical governing body’s behaviour, the judge acknowledged an “apparent bias, and failure to afford fair process.”

To this, he added, “The evidence eventually produced by the Board revealed other unsatisfactory features of their conduct in dealing with Dr Bay.”

Alongside APHRA’s failure to review his suspension, its ‘combative’ conduct towards Dr Bay continued long after the end of COVID measures, into the courtroom.

Although having a spotless record since becoming a GP in 2016, APHRA’s complaints painted Dr Bay as a “significant risk to the public.”

Prior to his suspension, APHRA alleged that Dr Bay’s criticisms of “Australia’s health care systems and regulators,” endangered Australians.

Those who denounced Dr Bay are listed as “notifiers.”

There were five in total.

One notifier said they were ‘making a complaint “about a health service on behalf of someone else.”

They saw Dr Bay’s social media, described it as “bizarre commentary” and reported it as “of an anti-vax nature.”

Consequently, labelled an “anti-vaxxer,” by adherents of the “pandemic of the unvaccinated” false narrative, Dr Bay was also accused of spreading misinformation.

At least one of his accusers – who had diagnosed his criticisms as having the “potential to cause serious harm” – wasn’t even a registered health practitioner.

Notifier number 4, was APHRA’s own Qld state manager, Heather Edwards.

Edwards took issue with Dr Bay’s politics and political activity.

One particular annoyance was Bay leading the Queensland Peoples Protest group rallies, in what Edwards deemed to be hostile to “AHPRA, and COVID-19 vaccinations.”

Here, Judge Bradley ruled that AHPRA’s ‘characterisation of the matter as an “Offence” was never justified.’

Edwards also considered Dr Bay’s  “anti-COVID-19 vaccination stance,”  “ill-informed,” and described it as “harmful messaging.”

If Edwards’ pursuit initialised suspension, notifier number 5 was the final nail to hit the coffin.

Associate Professor Julian Rait (Victorian AMA) took a similar exception to Dr Bay’s opposition to COVID mandates.

Rait claimed, in effect, that Dr Bay’s (now proven prophetic) “natural immunity” opposition to the “no jab, no job,” – “follow the science” – COVID consensus, was insulting to the point of putting the “public at risk.”

Noting how blatantly political the push to silence Dr Bay was, Judge Bradly wrote, APHRA and the board must have known “from the outset that all the notifications concerned political conduct by Dr Bay.

“There was no satisfactory explanation for defending the suspension decision after Dr Bay filed the application for review.”

It “indicates an animus towards Dr Bay.”

This is, the judge remarked, “in tune with the apparent bias that contaminated the original decision.”

He ruled the suspension of Dr William Bay null and void, telling the Board and AHPRA to pay all legal costs.

Special Request:

For nearly eight years, we've highlighted issues ignored by mainstream media and resisted globalist ideologies eroding Western civilization. We've done this joyfully, without paywalls, despite personal costs to our team. Your support has kept us going, but operating costs exceed donations, forcing us to use ads. We’d love to ditch them, so we’re asking for your help. If you value our work, please consider supporting us via Stripe or PayPal. Every bit helps us keep fighting for our kids’ future. Thank you!

What's New?

Use the blue arrows at the bottom to scroll through the latest.
UK Labour Cancels Grooming Gang Inquiries, Redirects £5M to Other Projects

UK Labour Cancels Grooming Gang Inquiries, Redirects £5M to Other Projects

“One of the victims was told by her rapist, ‘We’re here to f*** all the white girls and f*** the government.’”
By
by Staff WriterApr 9, 2025
UK Mother Jailed for Over 2 Years for Deleted Tweet Following Southport Massacre

UK Mother Jailed for Over 2 Years for Deleted Tweet Following Southport Massacre

"Requests for Connolly’s temporary release to support her family have been denied, with authorities citing concerns over public perception..."
By
by Staff WriterApr 9, 2025
There’s No Such Thing as a Religiously Neutral Society

There’s No Such Thing as a Religiously Neutral Society

"Absolute freedom is only possible in a lawless society. So, whether it is secularism or Christianity taking precedence, every alternative will be restrained at the point in which it conflicts with what the reigning system deems “good” for the wider society."
By
by Ben DavisApr 8, 2025
Is Christianity Jewish?

Is Christianity Jewish?

"The Church is neither Jewish nor Gentile, it is a new race, the third race."
By
by Matthew LittlefieldApr 8, 2025
Musk Warns Immigration Threatens National Identity: “A Country Is Its People”

Musk Warns Immigration Threatens National Identity: “A Country Is Its People”

"A country is its people. This is a fundamental concept that is truly obvious," Musk said.
By
by Staff WriterApr 7, 2025
The USA vs. The West: A Must-Read Viral Post by Martyn Iles

The USA vs. The West: A Must-Read Viral Post by Martyn Iles

"'Oh, the Americans and their guns!' we say, in our smug way. Yes, they have a warrior culture. We do not. We don't have to, because we're a leech on theirs."
By
by Staff WriterApr 6, 2025
LGBTQA Apostasy Laws

LGBTQA Apostasy Laws

"While the government promotes initiatives to encourage people to 'come out,' it simultaneously threatens criminal penalties against those who would even pray with someone seeking to step away from that identity."
By
by Ben DavisApr 5, 2025

Image

Support

If you value our work and would like to support us, you can do so by visiting our support page. Can’t find what you’re looking for? Visit our search page.

Copyright © 2025, Caldron Pool

Permissions

Everything published at Caldron Pool is protected by copyright and cannot be used and/or duplicated without prior written permission. Links and excerpts with full attribution are permitted. Published articles represent the opinions of the author and may not reflect the views of all contributors at Caldron Pool.

Caldron Pool does not condone the use of violence, threats, or intimidation for political or religious purposes. We strongly advocate for peaceful, respectful, and free communication and open debate without fear of reprisal or punishment.