Image

Is anti-discrimination the first commandment?

Drawing on the work of two American writers, Jonathan Haidt and Greg Lukianoff, Paul Kelly wrote recently of ‘the three great lies corroding Western cultures’. In his view, these are: first, that disputes today are a battle between good (defined as the oppressed victims) and evil (defined as the privileged minority); secondly, that people will be made weaker by being challenged so they need to be protected and made safe; and thirdly, that we must always trust our feelings. All that is undeniable, but associated with these great lies is the confusion in our view of the law. In the……

Drawing on the work of two American writers, Jonathan Haidt and Greg Lukianoff, Paul Kelly wrote recently of ‘the three great lies corroding Western cultures’. In his view, these are: first, that disputes today are a battle between good (defined as the oppressed victims) and evil (defined as the privileged minority); secondly, that people will be made weaker by being challenged so they need to be protected and made safe; and thirdly, that we must always trust our feelings.

All that is undeniable, but associated with these great lies is the confusion in our view of the law. In the Bible there is what we might call ‘primary moral law’ which consists of the commandments which forbid idolatry, murder, sexual immorality, stealing, and other sins (the Ten Commandments, for example). Then there is what we might call ‘secondary law’ where, for example, God forbids partiality, or what in some circumstances we might call ‘discrimination’. In the Old Testament, God declared to Israel: ‘You shall do no injustice in court. You shall not be partial to the poor or defer to the great, but in righteousness shall you judge your neighbour’ (Lev.19:15). Furthermore, ‘Cursed be anyone who perverts the justice due to the sojourner, the fatherless, and the widow. And all the people shall say, “Amen”‘ (Deuteronomy 27:19; see too Deut. 10:17).

The New Testament repeats the command to show no partiality (James 2:9), for God himself shows no partiality (Acts 10:34; Romans 2:11; 1 Peter 1:17). This would mean, for example, that it would be decidedly unchristian for a professedly Christian shop-keeper to refuse to serve a Muslim on the grounds that he is a Muslim. It might seem as though the ‘no partiality’ approach of the Bible is rather similar to the ‘no discrimination’ approach in modern law, but this is not so.

In the biblical approach, secondary law feeds off primary moral law. To give one obvious example, the Bible forbids homosexual acts as unnatural offences against primary moral law. Therefore, the prohibition against showing partiality cannot be interpreted in a way that protects sexual immorality. Toleration within biblical boundaries is laudable (Rom.14:1, 10; 15:1); outside those boundaries it to be rejected (2 Cor.11:4; Rev.2:20). What happens in modern law – and in the popular perception of it – is that secondary law becomes primary, even absolutist. To discriminate against someone becomes an offence against the first and great – and even only! – commandment. At the same time the primary moral law of the Bible drops out, and in cases of sexual ethics, runs the risk of being criminalised.

One result is what has been called the ‘Boo-Hurrah’ theory of ethics. If I am offended by what you say, then I am a victim and should be protected by law; if I like a certain lifestyle, then it is my protected ‘truth’ and nobody can challenge me. Primary moral is perceived, then, as unloving and even dangerous. As C. S. Lewis saw: ‘We make men without chests and we expect of them virtue and enterprise. We laugh at honour and are shocked to find traitors in our midst. We castrate and bid the geldings be fruitful.’

Australian governments have all passed Anti-Discrimination Acts which have allowed exemptions for churches, Christian schools and other religious organisations regarding sexuality. Logically, that will not last, and it is now obviously crumbling before our eyes. This is wonderful news for the unelected lawyers and judges who sit on anti-discrimination boards. As Charles Dickens commented in Bleak House: ‘The one great principle of the English law is, to make business for itself.’ The less Christian a society is, the more litigious it will be.

Some evangelicals have spoken of ‘building bridges with LGBTI people’ and that ‘sometimes brothers and sisters disagree on the way forward’. We need to be as loving as we can manage, but there will be no rewards for naivety. Charles Colson recalled his time in the White House during the Nixon administration when visitors and lobbyists would meet him. Also, ‘none were more compliant than the religious leaders.’ The whole framework which governs modern law is wrong, and too many Christians are trying, unsuccessfully in the long run, to argue that exemptions to a good law are good. That does not make sense. What is wrong is the modern view that ‘no discrimination’ makes for good law without clear, objective, God-given boundaries.

Special Request:

For nearly eight years, we've highlighted issues ignored by mainstream media and resisted globalist ideologies eroding Western civilization. We've done this joyfully, without paywalls, despite personal costs to our team. Your support has kept us going, but operating costs exceed donations, forcing us to use ads. We’d love to ditch them, so we’re asking for your help. If you value our work, please consider supporting us via Stripe or PayPal. Every bit helps us keep fighting for our kids’ future. Thank you!

What's New?

Use the blue arrows at the bottom to scroll through the latest.
Pete Hegseth Announces Monthly Prayer Meeting in the Pentagon

Pete Hegseth Announces Monthly Prayer Meeting in the Pentagon

"Hegseth told those gathered that the task of protecting the nation first begins on bended knees, recognising the providence of our Lord and Saviour Jesus Christ."
By
by Rod LampardMay 24, 2025
The Danger of Being Defined Only by What We Are Not

The Danger of Being Defined Only by What We Are Not

"Multiculturalism is an inherently reactive posture: we extend acceptance indiscriminately, only drawing boundaries retroactively, once harm is done or conflict arises and only ever at an individual level."
By
by Ben DavisMay 23, 2025
Officially Socialist?

Officially Socialist?

"So, the price of comfort is that we are treated like a cog in a machine. This becomes the ultimate sacrifice of our souls."
By
by Dr Stephen FysonMay 23, 2025
Disney’s ‘Lilo & Stitch’ Praised for Avoiding Woke Messaging

Disney’s ‘Lilo & Stitch’ Praised for Avoiding Woke Messaging

"Unlike some of the studio’s recent remakes, Lilo & Stitch appears to have avoided overt woke or ideological messaging—a decision that has resonated with many viewers, especially parents."
By
by Staff WriterMay 23, 2025
Trump’s Unflinching Mirror: South Africa’s Uncomfortable Truths

Trump’s Unflinching Mirror: South Africa’s Uncomfortable Truths

"Trump’s courage lies not in the precision of his terminology but in his willingness to broach this subject at all, knowing the denigration it would draw from a media that sees no fault in South Africa’s post-apartheid project."
By
by Michael MacConnellMay 22, 2025
Canada’s PM Promises to Punish Businesses That Reject Climate Agenda

Canada’s PM Promises to Punish Businesses That Reject Climate Agenda

"Those who are lagging behind and are still part of the problem will be punished," he said.
By
by Staff WriterMay 22, 2025
Trump Exposes South African Genocide During Ramaphosa Visit: “Watch This”

Trump Exposes South African Genocide During Ramaphosa Visit: “Watch This”

“We have thousands of stories talking about it," Trump said. "We have documentaries. We have news stories. I can show you a couple of things. It has to be responded to.”
By
by Staff WriterMay 22, 2025
AHPRA Targets Dr Jillian Spencer in Fresh Fight for Free Speech

AHPRA Targets Dr Jillian Spencer in Fresh Fight for Free Speech

"The persecution of doctors raising concerns about harm to children from gender interventions needs to stop," she said.
By
by Rod LampardMay 22, 2025

Image

Support

If you value our work and would like to support us, you can do so by visiting our support page. Can’t find what you’re looking for? Visit our search page.

Copyright © 2025, Caldron Pool

Permissions

Everything published at Caldron Pool is protected by copyright and cannot be used and/or duplicated without prior written permission. Links and excerpts with full attribution are permitted. Published articles represent the opinions of the author and may not reflect the views of all contributors at Caldron Pool.

Caldron Pool does not condone the use of violence, threats, or intimidation for political or religious purposes. We strongly advocate for peaceful, respectful, and free communication and open debate without fear of reprisal or punishment.