Image

If Not God, What? Some New Year Questions

"If not God, how do we know if we are looking at a lie beautifully told, or a truth told in ugliness?"

It seems some notable historians and social observers have been bumping into Christianity of late. Perhaps Christopher Hitchens’ brother, Peter, started it some time ago. [i] Although I do remember a theologian excitedly pointing me to Antony Flew’s There is a God. [ii] Greg Sheridan did a Christmas / New Year article summarising similar more recent turns of belief, [iii] commenting on the likes of Niall Ferguson, Douglas Murray, Jordan Peterson, Tom Holland, and Ayaan Hirsi Ali. Some give themselves interesting labels, like ‘Christian atheist’, but all seem to have looked at Christianity more seriously, and now cannot ignore it.

I rarely look at comments after articles, but I did scan across those that followed the Sheridan article. What I am interested in is the kinds of responses, not necessarily just the responses themselves. For example, there are those who are thankful and in wholehearted agreement; others are respectful but disagree with some aspect or more fully; and then there are those who label any such talk of religious belief as ‘non-empirical subjective projected fantasy,’ or some such descriptor.

The last category fascinates me, probably because I have heard it since my high school days, and then of course, amplified during my undergraduate days in the 1970’s. Back then I found myself in discussions that tried to explore life through this lens of ‘what you see is all that is there.’ I learnt to call this ‘nothing buttery’ – life is nothing but time + matter + chance (and I think that concept first came to me from early Christian psychology authors like Mark Cosgrove, Paul Vitz, John White and Gary Collins [iv]). I sometimes still have these kinds of responses when I write online as well – it is to be expected in Australia, either in 2024 or 2025!

What is really interesting for these people, is how they conceive of meaningful human life without God. I have read atheists who give a ‘gentle’ version of “eat, drink and be merry, for tomorrow we might die.” Their focus can be on striving to see the beautiful, or being honest and leaving a legacy, or helping those who cannot help themselves.

There are also those who give a harsher version of this way of looking at life. They do not say it, but beneath their explanations is a world without hope. In other places I have described how the former leader of the Greens in NSW Parliament admitted this when I was appearing at a Parliamentary Review Committee – his comment to me at one stage was “I gave up on hope [which is what I was promoting in my presentation] when I became an atheist at fifteen years of age.” The room went appropriately quiet at such a profound moment of self-disclosure. I sent Dr Kaye a copy of Chesterton’s Orthodoxy. He wrote back (yes, we corresponded with hand-written letters), giving appreciation for the book. He unexpectedly died of cancer soon after this exchange. I think he was seeking something beyond his hopelessness, and pray that he found it (it was Jesus who said, “Those who seek shall find.” – Matthew 7:8 – I hope Dr Kaye was seeking Truth and found God)

Such ways of approaching life – either soft or hard materialism – remind me of the unanswered questions that the ‘nothing but’ crew avoid. These include (but are not limited to): If not God, then what of first physical causes? If not God, then how did dead matter lead to alive matter? If not God, then how did dead matter lead to complex organisms, like the first DNA (which requires information from somewhere even in its formation – and information cannot be formulated and communicated by dead matter [v]). If not God, then how did dead matter lead to consciousness, and then self-consciousness? [vi] If not God, then how do we know what is right, good and true? If not God, how do we know what is wrong, bad and a lie? If not God, how can we know what is beautiful, and what is ugly? If not God, how do we know if we are looking at a lie beautifully told, or a truth told in ugliness?

Given this vacuum of thought about who we are as humans, and what is meaningful for us, it is no wonder that we have leaders who cannot answer questions about ‘What is good research?’ (think climate alarmism). Neither can they even start to respond to enquiries ‘From where do our thoughts come?’, and its follow on question, “How can we know whether thinking is disordered, or not?’ (think critical identity theory) Response to these kinds of questions requires at least some consideration about the concepts of ‘What is real?’, and ‘How do we make sense of what is real?’

And all of that comes back to being honest to admit whether there are non-physical aspects to reality as well as physical aspects. Wouldn’t it be grand to have some of our leaders engage in such discussion?

That is unlikely in many quarters of Australia because currently our society increasingly demands that we are clever enough to be self-sufficient with our knowledge. We then pretend that such knowledge transfers into becoming wisdom which can give us moral clarity. This is nonsense, because as we have seen in the unanswered questions above, such belief makes ‘no sense’, despite protestations to the opposite.

It is why I never tire of reading the ‘Old Book’ – the Bible. As was suggested to me when I was a teen at university the first time – “Read everything they give you but read your Bible most. It makes most sense of life.”

To which I say, five decades later, Amen! And thank you, God.

Grace and peace,

Stephen


[i] See Peter Hitchens, Rage Against God: How Atheism Led me to Faith.  Zondervan, 2010.

[ii] Antony Flew, There is a God: How the world’s most notorious atheist changed his mind. Harper One, 2007

[iii]  https://www.theaustralian.com.au/inquirer/how-historian-niall-ferguson-became-a-religious-believer/news-story/584b057b0dde22570a248ea3b5d7f433

[iv] For those interested in such early Christian psychology writings, the references are: Mark P Cosgrove, Psychology Gone Awry: Four psychological world views, 1979, IVP; Paul C Vitz, Psychology as Religion: The Cult of Self-Worship, William B Eerdmans, 1977; John White, Putting the Soul Back in Psychology: When secular values ignore spiritual realities, IVP, 1987; Gart R Collins, The Rebuilding of Psychology: An integration of psychology and Christianity, Tyndale Publishers, 1977.

[v] For more on this, see Stephen Meyer’s The Return of the God Hypothesis: Three Scientific discoveries that reveal the mind behind the universe, Harper One, 2021

[vi] Most of these questions are admitted as a problem for materialistic philosophers by the ‘honest atheist’ Thomas Nagel, Mind and Cosmos: Why the materialist neo-Darwinian conception of nature is almost certainly false. Oxford University Press, 2012

Special Request:

For nearly eight years, we've highlighted issues ignored by mainstream media and resisted globalist ideologies eroding Western civilization. We've done this joyfully, without paywalls, despite personal costs to our team. Your support has kept us going, but operating costs exceed donations, forcing us to use ads. We’d love to ditch them, so we’re asking for your help. If you value our work, please consider supporting us via Stripe or PayPal. Every bit helps us keep fighting for our kids’ future. Thank you!

What's New?

Use the blue arrows at the bottom to scroll through the latest.
700 Psychiatrists Support “Gender-Affirming” Critic’s Battle to End  The LGBTransitioning of Kids

700 Psychiatrists Support “Gender-Affirming” Critic’s Battle to End  The LGBTransitioning of Kids

"These interventions don’t improve the child’s mental health and they don’t reduce the risk of suicide."
By
by Rod LampardApr 3, 2025
What is the Most Violent Ideology?

What is the Most Violent Ideology?

"There is one ideology that leaves others in its dust and continues to achieve a number of deaths at a rate of almost an entire World War 2 each year."
By
by Matthew LittlefieldApr 2, 2025
Senator Rennick: Australians Are “Enslaved to Debt”

Senator Rennick: Australians Are “Enslaved to Debt”

"Nothing controls people more than debt."
By
by Staff WriterApr 1, 2025
New COVID Censorship Bombshells Expose the Far-Left’s Weaponisation of Fact-Checking

New COVID Censorship Bombshells Expose the Far-Left’s Weaponisation of Fact-Checking

“The documents paint a picture of massive government-backed censorship.”
By
by Rod LampardApr 1, 2025
Ethnic Minorities Prioritized for Bail in Two-Tier System

Ethnic Minorities Prioritized for Bail in Two-Tier System

Newly revealed Ministry of Justice guidance instructs UK judges to prioritize bail hearings for ethnic minorities, women, and transgender defendants. In other words, everyone other than straight, White, males.
By
by Staff WriterMar 31, 2025
Tolerance Is Suicide

Tolerance Is Suicide

"For Western civilization to survive, it must relearn the lost Christian virtue of intolerance."
By
by Ben DavisMar 31, 2025
Irish Government Freezes Christian Teacher’s Bank Account After He Refused to Use Gender-Neutral Pronouns

Irish Government Freezes Christian Teacher’s Bank Account After He Refused to Use Gender-Neutral Pronouns

"What this is all about is an attempt to change the face of our country..."
By
by Staff WriterMar 31, 2025
We All Want More Than This World Can Give

We All Want More Than This World Can Give

“If we find ourselves with a desire that nothing in this world can satisfy, the most probable explanation is that we were made for another world.”
By
by Staff WriterMar 30, 2025

Image

Support

If you value our work and would like to support us, you can do so by visiting our support page. Can’t find what you’re looking for? Visit our search page.

Copyright © 2025, Caldron Pool

Permissions

Everything published at Caldron Pool is protected by copyright and cannot be used and/or duplicated without prior written permission. Links and excerpts with full attribution are permitted. Published articles represent the opinions of the author and may not reflect the views of all contributors at Caldron Pool.

Caldron Pool does not condone the use of violence, threats, or intimidation for political or religious purposes. We strongly advocate for peaceful, respectful, and free communication and open debate without fear of reprisal or punishment.