Image

How Can the Government Police Hate If It Can’t Define Love?

"Law cannot make men good. Only the Gospel can. And the more the state tries to enforce love and cohesion by the sword, the more it will breed resentment, not unity."

The law of God commands us to love our neighbours—even our enemies. In the negative, it forbids hatred. Yet the entire Old Testament stands as vivid proof that the law alone cannot restrain humanity’s sinful tendency to hate. It can restrain evil, but it cannot remove it.

Having rejected the authority of Scripture, the Australian government is now repeating the same mistake—attempting to police an arbitrary definition of “hate.” But how can a government police hate without first clearly defining what constitutes love?

God is love (1 John 4:8, 16), yet the government’s absurd commitment to religious pluralism and moral relativism prevents it from affirming that truth. This makes every attempt to police hate inherently arbitrary. In reality, these efforts seem designed to keep the law flexible enough to prosecute anyone for saying anything.

But in essence, the state is attempting to force Australians to love their neighbours, whatever their elastic definition of love might be. But love cannot be legislated. It cannot be threatened into existence by fines, surveillance, or imprisonment. The Bible makes this clear: love cannot be coerced. Peace with our enemies is the by-product of peace with God.

There is only one remedy Scripture offers—the Gospel of Jesus Christ. The repeated failures of Israel under the Old Covenant all point us toward something greater: the transforming power of grace through the Gospel.

By rejecting that Gospel, our nation has forfeited its long-proven, civilising influence on society. We now live in an increasingly anti-Christian culture, unanchored from any higher moral authority and driven largely by base desires. Having cast aside the cure for hate, the government now attempts to police its symptoms.

But law cannot make men good. Only the Gospel can. And the more the state tries to enforce love and cohesion by the sword, the more it will breed resentment, not unity.

Special Request:

For nearly eight years, we've highlighted issues ignored by mainstream media and resisted globalist ideologies eroding Western civilization. We've done this joyfully, without paywalls, despite personal costs to our team. Your support has kept us going, but operating costs exceed donations, forcing us to use ads. We’d love to ditch them, so we’re asking for your help. If you value our work, please consider supporting us via Stripe or PayPal. Every bit helps us keep fighting for our kids’ future. Thank you!

What's New?

Use the blue arrows at the bottom to scroll through the latest.
Social Media Bans for Under-16s: Helpful Reform or Misplaced Hope?

Social Media Bans for Under-16s: Helpful Reform or Misplaced Hope?

Will banning social media accounts for under-16s meaningfully improve the wellbeing of young people?
By
by Dr Stephen FysonFeb 3, 2026
Petra Rocks Back to Life: Legendary Band Drops ‘Hope’ After 20 Year Studio Hiatus

Petra Rocks Back to Life: Legendary Band Drops ‘Hope’ After 20 Year Studio Hiatus

"After signing off in an era-ending 2005 farewell, the band just surprised the world with ‘Hope.’"
By
by Rod LampardFeb 2, 2026
Christianity Endured Decades of Hate Without Hate Speech Protections, And There’s a Reason Why

Christianity Endured Decades of Hate Without Hate Speech Protections, And There’s a Reason Why

“The only ideas that demand the sword of the state for protection are those that cannot stand on their own, those that crumble under scrutiny, criticism, or challenge.”
By
by Staff WriterFeb 2, 2026
Evolution is Dead, But Its Corpse Will Hang Around A While

Evolution is Dead, But Its Corpse Will Hang Around A While

“Genetics has now demonstrated that the mechanisms that have been proposed to drive evolution by natural selection cannot have possibly done so.”
By
by Matthew LittlefieldJan 31, 2026
Spain Grants Legal Status to Half a Million Migrants to “Fight the Far-Right”

Spain Grants Legal Status to Half a Million Migrants to “Fight the Far-Right”

"By framing the mass introduction of migrants as an instrument to counter political opponents, authorities have confirmed a suspicion long held by many across the Western world: that large-scale population movements are not treated as a humanitarian necessity, but as a political weapon against Nationalism."
By
by Staff WriterJan 30, 2026
Why Voters Are Abandoning the Liberals for One Nation

Why Voters Are Abandoning the Liberals for One Nation

“Australians aren't looking for a softer political version of what they're already suffering under. They are looking for an alternative.”
By
by Staff WriterJan 30, 2026
First the Imams, Then the Pastors

First the Imams, Then the Pastors

"Without formally recognising Christianity, accrediting imams today easily becomes accrediting pastors tomorrow. From there, it is a small step to state-sanctioned sermons, state-issued Bibles, state-regulated songs, and state-approved prayers."
By
by Staff WriterJan 29, 2026
The Evangelical Retreat: How Protestant Piety Became Cowardice

The Evangelical Retreat: How Protestant Piety Became Cowardice

"This is the spiritual problem of our age: We have a church that fears crucifixion more than compromise."
By
by Staff WriterJan 28, 2026

Image

Support

If you value our work and would like to support us, you can do so by visiting our support page. Can’t find what you’re looking for? Visit our search page.

Copyright © 2025, Caldron Pool

Permissions

Everything published at Caldron Pool is protected by copyright and cannot be used and/or duplicated without prior written permission. Links and excerpts with full attribution are permitted. Published articles represent the opinions of the author and may not reflect the views of all contributors at Caldron Pool.

Caldron Pool does not condone the use of violence, threats, or intimidation for political or religious purposes. We strongly advocate for peaceful, respectful, and free communication and open debate without fear of reprisal or punishment.