Image

Elon Musk Refuses to Confirm or Deny Any Vance 2028 Endorsement

“Musk’s only direct public response to the claims? — ‘Nothing the WSJ says should ever be thought of as true.’”

Elon Musk is refusing to confirm whether he will endorse JD Vance or continue pursuing third political party post-Trump.

Major speculation about Musk’s post-Trump plans spread like wildfire after the Wall Street Journal (WSJ) dropped claims he was maneuvering to back the VP for a 2028 Presidential run.

WSJ turned hearsay into fact-based assertions in an August 19 piece, which quickly went viral.

According to the article, “People close to Elon Musk have said he is considering using some of his vast financial resources to back Vance if he decides to run for president in 2028.”

This is why he was “quietly pumping the brakes on starting a third political entity, called the America Party.”

Although Musk appears to have abruptly cut off contact with Donald Trump over his – not DOGE-friendly – “Big Beautiful Bill,” Musk still seems to be connected to the Vice President. 

This was somewhat proven by Vance publicly reaching out to him earlier this month, where he encouraged Musk to stick with MAGA.

The America Party proposal was Elon Musk’s revolt against the slow reformation of government expenditure.

He also sees the slow removal of the big bureaucracy band-aid as counterproductive to Trump’s core political promises about saving the United States from crippling debt.

With the thawing of Musk’s (let’s be blunt, almost juvenile) meltdown on X over Trump’s spending and savings bill, talk about the America party has melted away along with it.

Musk appears to have heeded Vance’s call.

Never-Trump backers, like billionaire Mark Cuban, who lined up to bankroll the America Party, never got a call back after endorsing the idea.

America’s “anything goes” Libertarians were in the same camp, with chairman Steven Nekhaila describing the silence as “eerie.”

“It doesn’t seem like anything has been in action, neither at the state level nor at the ground level.”

Even “Musk’s own political advisers haven’t had conversations with the Tesla CEO or his inner circle about helping him form a political party, ”the WSJ said.

Although the America Party was losing altitude, “Musk’s allies” had apparently told the WSJ he “hasn’t formally ruled out creating the new party,” saying, “he could change his mind as the midterm elections near.”

Predictably, most major networks picked up the WSJ clickbait – because that’s exactly what it was. All were apparently giddy at the prospect of a front row seat for the fall of Trump’s second Presidency.

By incorrectly claiming Musk was ousted from the Trump administration, The UK Independent argued that Musk’s legally required departure from the White House was another contributing factor:

“After the billionaire was ousted from the Trump administration at the end of May and a subsequent online feud blew up with President Donald Trump, Musk threatened to launch the new ‘America Party.”

Yet, “plans for the America Party have been shelved,” they reported.

Forbes foraged under the same WSJ rock for the same opportunistic – “get Trump at all costs” – fodder.

Musk’s only direct public response to the claims? “Nothing the WSJ says should ever be thought of as true.”

The brief reply is consistent. Musk’s relationship with Trump is in a better condition than his relationship with legacy media. 

For instance, Musk has no deep affection for the Wall Street Journal and its constant misdiagnosis of his character, conduct, and creed.

In June, he fired back at repeated claims about drug use and being under the influence of hard drugs.

Posting a toxicology test on X, he said,

 “The WSJ & New York Times fake ‘journalists’ lied through their teeth about me. Now let’s see their drug test results. They will fail.”

The comments were made after he challenged writers to step up and have their own tests done.

Other examples of discontent with the massively manipulative mass media go back as far as 2014.

Musk accused WSJ of being in the pockets of big oil, has referred to them as “clowns,” and stated that they’re journalism is nothing but “third-party random hearsay.”

He once tore into Rolling Stone, declaring the “non-existent” magazine to be an anchor for Woke Mind Virus propaganda.

The Washington Post didn’t escape an ear-bashing either. 

In a clear enough reference to the WaPo’s costly Covington School Boys hoax, Musk rightly asserted on X in June last year that WaPo had become a “far left propaganda publication.”

Despite the dispute, Musk’s plans to dissociate with MAGA appear to be deflating.

This is a good development.

More so if the cause is Musk’s respect for JD Vance, mixed perhaps with a fresh appreciation for Trump’s need to play 4D chess to Make America Healthy Again.

Special Request:

For nearly eight years, we've highlighted issues ignored by mainstream media and resisted globalist ideologies eroding Western civilization. We've done this joyfully, without paywalls, despite personal costs to our team. Your support has kept us going, but operating costs exceed donations, forcing us to use ads. We’d love to ditch them, so we’re asking for your help. If you value our work, please consider supporting us via Stripe or PayPal. Every bit helps us keep fighting for our kids’ future. Thank you!

What's New?

Use the blue arrows at the bottom to scroll through the latest.
Bondi Massacre: A Wake-Up Call for Australia

Bondi Massacre: A Wake-Up Call for Australia

"Without honest discourse, decisive policy, and recognition that not all cultures can coexist harmoniously, such attacks are likely to recur—just look at Europe today."
By
by Staff WriterDec 15, 2025
White Guilt is Dead

White Guilt is Dead

"For decades, White guilt has been used as a tool of social control—silencing dissent, suppressing legitimate demographic concerns, and guilt-tripping Westerners into accepting policies that no other civilisation on earth would tolerate."
By
by Staff WriterDec 13, 2025
Brave New Families: How State Power Is Replacing Parental Responsibility

Brave New Families: How State Power Is Replacing Parental Responsibility

“All I see is the dystopian Brave New future that are projections of our simplistic mechanistic leaders, which makes sense, given their godfather is Karl Marx, a determinist who has bred many of his kind after his image.”
By
by Dr Stephen FysonDec 12, 2025
When the State Becomes Co-Parent: Australia’s Intrusion into Family Life

When the State Becomes Co-Parent: Australia’s Intrusion into Family Life

"As the state once absorbed the moral and spiritual leadership of the Church over society, so too can it absorb the moral and spiritual authority of parents over their children."
By
by Staff WriterDec 11, 2025
Tarantino Ranks ‘The Passion of the Christ’ Among the Best Films of the Century

Tarantino Ranks ‘The Passion of the Christ’ Among the Best Films of the Century

“I think it actually is one of the most brilliant visual storytelling films ever made,” he said.
By
by Rod LampardDec 11, 2025
Truth Tax: Senate Dissenters Reject Albo’s FOI Amendments as a “Hubris-Driven Attack on Transparency”

Truth Tax: Senate Dissenters Reject Albo’s FOI Amendments as a “Hubris-Driven Attack on Transparency”

"The consensus from dissenters seems to be that this bill further distances the Australian government from the people its representatives are elected to serve."
By
by Rod LampardDec 10, 2025
Speech Rejected, Promiscuity Approved

Speech Rejected, Promiscuity Approved

"The question arises, while Candace Owens' verbalising conservative values is not in our nation's interest, Lily Philips' sleeping around with Australian men is?"
By
by Selah CampisiDec 9, 2025
Archbishop Warns Agenda 2030 Activists Have Infiltrated Western Governments

Archbishop Warns Agenda 2030 Activists Have Infiltrated Western Governments

“A dangerous subversive elite has managed to infiltrate at the highest levels of Western institutions and governments," he warned.
By
by Rod LampardDec 8, 2025

Image

Support

If you value our work and would like to support us, you can do so by visiting our support page. Can’t find what you’re looking for? Visit our search page.

Copyright © 2025, Caldron Pool

Permissions

Everything published at Caldron Pool is protected by copyright and cannot be used and/or duplicated without prior written permission. Links and excerpts with full attribution are permitted. Published articles represent the opinions of the author and may not reflect the views of all contributors at Caldron Pool.

Caldron Pool does not condone the use of violence, threats, or intimidation for political or religious purposes. We strongly advocate for peaceful, respectful, and free communication and open debate without fear of reprisal or punishment.