Image

Elon Musk Refuses to Confirm or Deny Any Vance 2028 Endorsement

“Musk’s only direct public response to the claims? — ‘Nothing the WSJ says should ever be thought of as true.’”

Elon Musk is refusing to confirm whether he will endorse JD Vance or continue pursuing third political party post-Trump.

Major speculation about Musk’s post-Trump plans spread like wildfire after the Wall Street Journal (WSJ) dropped claims he was maneuvering to back the VP for a 2028 Presidential run.

WSJ turned hearsay into fact-based assertions in an August 19 piece, which quickly went viral.

According to the article, “People close to Elon Musk have said he is considering using some of his vast financial resources to back Vance if he decides to run for president in 2028.”

This is why he was “quietly pumping the brakes on starting a third political entity, called the America Party.”

Although Musk appears to have abruptly cut off contact with Donald Trump over his – not DOGE-friendly – “Big Beautiful Bill,” Musk still seems to be connected to the Vice President. 

This was somewhat proven by Vance publicly reaching out to him earlier this month, where he encouraged Musk to stick with MAGA.

The America Party proposal was Elon Musk’s revolt against the slow reformation of government expenditure.

He also sees the slow removal of the big bureaucracy band-aid as counterproductive to Trump’s core political promises about saving the United States from crippling debt.

With the thawing of Musk’s (let’s be blunt, almost juvenile) meltdown on X over Trump’s spending and savings bill, talk about the America party has melted away along with it.

Musk appears to have heeded Vance’s call.

Never-Trump backers, like billionaire Mark Cuban, who lined up to bankroll the America Party, never got a call back after endorsing the idea.

America’s “anything goes” Libertarians were in the same camp, with chairman Steven Nekhaila describing the silence as “eerie.”

“It doesn’t seem like anything has been in action, neither at the state level nor at the ground level.”

Even “Musk’s own political advisers haven’t had conversations with the Tesla CEO or his inner circle about helping him form a political party, ”the WSJ said.

Although the America Party was losing altitude, “Musk’s allies” had apparently told the WSJ he “hasn’t formally ruled out creating the new party,” saying, “he could change his mind as the midterm elections near.”

Predictably, most major networks picked up the WSJ clickbait – because that’s exactly what it was. All were apparently giddy at the prospect of a front row seat for the fall of Trump’s second Presidency.

By incorrectly claiming Musk was ousted from the Trump administration, The UK Independent argued that Musk’s legally required departure from the White House was another contributing factor:

“After the billionaire was ousted from the Trump administration at the end of May and a subsequent online feud blew up with President Donald Trump, Musk threatened to launch the new ‘America Party.”

Yet, “plans for the America Party have been shelved,” they reported.

Forbes foraged under the same WSJ rock for the same opportunistic – “get Trump at all costs” – fodder.

Musk’s only direct public response to the claims? “Nothing the WSJ says should ever be thought of as true.”

The brief reply is consistent. Musk’s relationship with Trump is in a better condition than his relationship with legacy media. 

For instance, Musk has no deep affection for the Wall Street Journal and its constant misdiagnosis of his character, conduct, and creed.

In June, he fired back at repeated claims about drug use and being under the influence of hard drugs.

Posting a toxicology test on X, he said,

 “The WSJ & New York Times fake ‘journalists’ lied through their teeth about me. Now let’s see their drug test results. They will fail.”

The comments were made after he challenged writers to step up and have their own tests done.

Other examples of discontent with the massively manipulative mass media go back as far as 2014.

Musk accused WSJ of being in the pockets of big oil, has referred to them as “clowns,” and stated that they’re journalism is nothing but “third-party random hearsay.”

He once tore into Rolling Stone, declaring the “non-existent” magazine to be an anchor for Woke Mind Virus propaganda.

The Washington Post didn’t escape an ear-bashing either. 

In a clear enough reference to the WaPo’s costly Covington School Boys hoax, Musk rightly asserted on X in June last year that WaPo had become a “far left propaganda publication.”

Despite the dispute, Musk’s plans to dissociate with MAGA appear to be deflating.

This is a good development.

More so if the cause is Musk’s respect for JD Vance, mixed perhaps with a fresh appreciation for Trump’s need to play 4D chess to Make America Healthy Again.

Special Request:

For nearly eight years, we've highlighted issues ignored by mainstream media and resisted globalist ideologies eroding Western civilization. We've done this joyfully, without paywalls, despite personal costs to our team. Your support has kept us going, but operating costs exceed donations, forcing us to use ads. We’d love to ditch them, so we’re asking for your help. If you value our work, please consider supporting us via Stripe or PayPal. Every bit helps us keep fighting for our kids’ future. Thank you!

What's New?

Use the blue arrows at the bottom to scroll through the latest.
Deeming Backs Smith After Pronoun Police Penalty: Refusing to Affirm a Lie Isn’t Dishonesty – It’s Courage!

Deeming Backs Smith After Pronoun Police Penalty: Refusing to Affirm a Lie Isn’t Dishonesty – It’s Courage!

“By supporting Kirralie, you’re really supporting every single Australian who wants to speak up in the future. This is especially so for women, because when one woman is punished for this, thousands of women are made silent.”
By
by Rod LampardDec 17, 2025
We Don’t Need Antisemitism Laws—We Need Anti-Australia Laws

We Don’t Need Antisemitism Laws—We Need Anti-Australia Laws

Australia does not need race-based antisemitism laws; it needs a pro-Australian legal framework that applies equally to all and punishes harmful conduct regardless of who commits it or who the victim is.
By
by Ben DavisDec 17, 2025
From “You Do You” to Leadership Coups: The Deadly Fruit of Post-Modernists in the Pulpit

From “You Do You” to Leadership Coups: The Deadly Fruit of Post-Modernists in the Pulpit

“Anyone who says that there are no truths, or that all truth is ‘merely relative,’ is asking you not to believe him. So don’t!”
By
by Rod LampardDec 16, 2025
Matt Walsh Slams Australian Government After Bondi Shooting

Matt Walsh Slams Australian Government After Bondi Shooting

"Rules are not enough. You also need to ensure that your country is full of people who are willing to follow those rules. And in that very important respect, Australia has clearly failed."
By
by Staff WriterDec 16, 2025
A Government Too Afraid to Name the Problem Can Never Fix It

A Government Too Afraid to Name the Problem Can Never Fix It

"Governments have become not only incapable but increasingly unwilling to acknowledge the simple and self-evident truth that some ideas are bad, and bad ideas inevitably produce bad behaviour."
By
by Ben DavisDec 16, 2025
16-Year-Old Explains Why the Social Media Ban Won’t Work

16-Year-Old Explains Why the Social Media Ban Won’t Work

"There are three very prominent concerns when it comes to how this law will actually work and the repercussions it could have."
By
by Selah CampisiDec 15, 2025
Bondi Massacre: A Wake-Up Call for Australia

Bondi Massacre: A Wake-Up Call for Australia

"Without honest discourse, decisive policy, and recognition that not all cultures can coexist harmoniously, such attacks are likely to recur—just look at Europe today."
By
by Staff WriterDec 15, 2025
White Guilt is Dead

White Guilt is Dead

"For decades, White guilt has been used as a tool of social control—silencing dissent, suppressing legitimate demographic concerns, and guilt-tripping Westerners into accepting policies that no other civilisation on earth would tolerate."
By
by Staff WriterDec 13, 2025

Image

Support

If you value our work and would like to support us, you can do so by visiting our support page. Can’t find what you’re looking for? Visit our search page.

Copyright © 2025, Caldron Pool

Permissions

Everything published at Caldron Pool is protected by copyright and cannot be used and/or duplicated without prior written permission. Links and excerpts with full attribution are permitted. Published articles represent the opinions of the author and may not reflect the views of all contributors at Caldron Pool.

Caldron Pool does not condone the use of violence, threats, or intimidation for political or religious purposes. We strongly advocate for peaceful, respectful, and free communication and open debate without fear of reprisal or punishment.