Image

Elon Musk Accuses ADL of “Anti-White Racism”

"The ADL’s definition implied that white people cannot be victims of 'racism,' and that non-white individuals cannot be guilty of it."

Elon Musk has accused the Anti-Defamation League (ADL), an organization supposedly dedicated to fighting antisemitism and bigotry, of promoting “anti-white racism.”

On Monday, Musk reacted to a post on X (formerly Twitter) that included a screenshot from the ADL’s website, showing their previous definition of “racism” before it was revised in 2022 following public backlash.

The definition read: “The marginalization and/or oppression of people of color based on a socially constructed racial hierarchy that privileges white people.”

In other words, the ADL’s definition implied that white people cannot be victims of “racism,” and that non-white individuals cannot be guilty of it.

Musk fired back, writing: “ADL needs to stop their anti-white racism now!”

In 2022, the ADL updated its 2020 definition of racism, changing it to “when individuals or institutions show more favorable evaluation or treatment of an individual or group based on race or ethnicity.”

This isn’t the first time Musk has criticized the ADL. In November last year, he responded to a post accusing certain Jewish communities of promoting anti-white rhetoric while expecting protection from similar forms of hatred.

Musk agreed with the sentiment, stating: “You have said the actual truth.”

Elaborating further, Musk claimed that the ADL “unjustly attacks the majority of the West, despite the majority of the West supporting the Jewish people and Israel.”

He argued that the ADL refuses to critique minority groups that are perceived as a threat: “This is because they cannot, by their own tenets, criticize the minority groups who are their primary threat. It is not right and needs to stop.”

Musk emphasized that his critique wasn’t aimed at all Jewish communities but noted that the issue extends beyond the ADL.

“I am deeply offended by ADL’s messaging and any other group who push de facto anti-white racism or anti-Asian racism or racism of any kind,” he said.

“I’m sick of it. Stop now.”

The ADL’s CEO, Jonathan Greenblatt, responded to Musk’s comments, saying: “At a time when antisemitism is exploding in America and surging around the world, it is indisputably dangerous to use one’s influence to validate and promote antisemitic theories. #NeverIsNow.”

In January 2021, the ADL called for the removal of Donald Trump from social media following the January 6 protest at the Capitol, claiming the former President had links to far-right and antisemitic groups.

Since then, Musk has accused the ADL of being “instrumental” in getting Trump de-platformed across social media.

“When we restored the account, they made it super clear that they regarded simply restoring his account on Twitter, now X, constituted hateful speech,” Musk said.

“He hasn’t even said anything.”

Throughout 2021, the ADL repeatedly called on Fox News to fire Tucker Carlson after he promoted the “great replacement theory.”

Carlson dismissed the ADL’s criticism as politically motivated. In 2023, Fox News dropped Carlson, a move welcomed by the ADL. Soon after, Carlson relaunched his show on X, reigniting the charges against the “free speech” platform.

Musk has accused ADL of almost killing X after advertising revenue dropped by 60% “primarily due to pressure on advertisers.”

In September 2023, Musk threatened to sue the ADL, saying, “To clear our platform’s name on the matter of anti-Semitism, it looks like we have no choice but to file a defamation lawsuit against the Anti-Defimation League… oh the irony!”

A month later, the ADL released a statement addressing developments with X, emphasizing their willingness to collaborate with the platform, denying claims of orchestrating a boycott, and expressing plans to resume advertising.

In November 2023, Musk announced a new policy change that could see “antisemitic” phrases, such as “decolonization” and “from the river to the sea,” result in “suspension” from the platform.

Musk’s ongoing conflict with the ADL highlights the risks of selectively policing “racism” and demonstrates the need to protect free speech for everyone, rather than letting certain groups decide who gets to speak.

Special Request:

For nearly eight years, we've highlighted issues ignored by mainstream media and resisted globalist ideologies eroding Western civilization. We've done this joyfully, without paywalls, despite personal costs to our team. Your support has kept us going, but operating costs exceed donations, forcing us to use ads. We’d love to ditch them, so we’re asking for your help. If you value our work, please consider supporting us via Stripe or PayPal. Every bit helps us keep fighting for our kids’ future. Thank you!

What's New?

Use the blue arrows at the bottom to scroll through the latest.
From “You Do You” to Leadership Coups: The Deadly Fruit of Post-Modernists in the Pulpit

From “You Do You” to Leadership Coups: The Deadly Fruit of Post-Modernists in the Pulpit

“Anyone who says that there are no truths, or that all truth is ‘merely relative,’ is asking you not to believe him. So don’t!”
By
by Rod LampardDec 16, 2025
Matt Walsh Slams Australian Government After Bondi Shooting

Matt Walsh Slams Australian Government After Bondi Shooting

"Rules are not enough. You also need to ensure that your country is full of people who are willing to follow those rules. And in that very important respect, Australia has clearly failed."
By
by Staff WriterDec 16, 2025
A Government Too Afraid to Name the Problem Can Never Fix It

A Government Too Afraid to Name the Problem Can Never Fix It

"Governments have become not only incapable but increasingly unwilling to acknowledge the simple and self-evident truth that some ideas are bad, and bad ideas inevitably produce bad behaviour."
By
by Ben DavisDec 16, 2025
16-Year-Old Explains Why the Social Media Ban Won’t Work

16-Year-Old Explains Why the Social Media Ban Won’t Work

"There are three very prominent concerns when it comes to how this law will actually work and the repercussions it could have."
By
by Selah CampisiDec 15, 2025
Bondi Massacre: A Wake-Up Call for Australia

Bondi Massacre: A Wake-Up Call for Australia

"Without honest discourse, decisive policy, and recognition that not all cultures can coexist harmoniously, such attacks are likely to recur—just look at Europe today."
By
by Staff WriterDec 15, 2025
White Guilt is Dead

White Guilt is Dead

"For decades, White guilt has been used as a tool of social control—silencing dissent, suppressing legitimate demographic concerns, and guilt-tripping Westerners into accepting policies that no other civilisation on earth would tolerate."
By
by Staff WriterDec 13, 2025
Brave New Families: How State Power Is Replacing Parental Responsibility

Brave New Families: How State Power Is Replacing Parental Responsibility

“All I see is the dystopian Brave New future that are projections of our simplistic mechanistic leaders, which makes sense, given their godfather is Karl Marx, a determinist who has bred many of his kind after his image.”
By
by Dr Stephen FysonDec 12, 2025
When the State Becomes Co-Parent: Australia’s Intrusion into Family Life

When the State Becomes Co-Parent: Australia’s Intrusion into Family Life

"As the state once absorbed the moral and spiritual leadership of the Church over society, so too can it absorb the moral and spiritual authority of parents over their children."
By
by Staff WriterDec 11, 2025

Image

Support

If you value our work and would like to support us, you can do so by visiting our support page. Can’t find what you’re looking for? Visit our search page.

Copyright © 2025, Caldron Pool

Permissions

Everything published at Caldron Pool is protected by copyright and cannot be used and/or duplicated without prior written permission. Links and excerpts with full attribution are permitted. Published articles represent the opinions of the author and may not reflect the views of all contributors at Caldron Pool.

Caldron Pool does not condone the use of violence, threats, or intimidation for political or religious purposes. We strongly advocate for peaceful, respectful, and free communication and open debate without fear of reprisal or punishment.