Image

Democrats Propose Letting Any Adult Claim Legal Rights Over a Child, Raising Trafficking Fears

"Democrats want the definition of parent to include anyone 'with an established familial or mentoring relationship with the child, or with a relative of the child.'"

Any adult will be able to claim legal rights over a child if a new nightmare proposal passes in California. 

Named the Family Preparedness Plan Act (AB495), Democrats want the definition of parent to include anyone “with an established familial or mentoring relationship with the child, or with a relative of the child.”

Criticising the bill, California Family Council (CFC) said the proposals were a gift to human traffickers.

AB495 allows almost anyone to “assume decision-making authority over a child’s schooling.”

This includes decision-making about a child’s “medical care, without a court appearance, notarization, or biological parental signature.”

CFC also said that if AB495 becomes law, anyone who self-identifies as a child’s parent, referred to in the bill as a caregiver, will have the ability to enrol the child in a school and authorise medical procedures. 

Such as transgender mutilation surgery, dental and mental health treatments.

Additionally, schools will not be required to verify the “identity, relationship or legitimacy of the adult claiming to be a child’s caregiver.”

Defending its move to kill off key safeguards for parents and children, Democrats said the changes were about protecting immigrants.

AB495 is being sold as a counterweight to Trump’s widely popular “Americans First,” ICE initiatives.

According to supporters, ripping up current protections is about protecting children whose parents may be “unexpectedly detained or deported by federal immigration officials.”

Opponents are not convinced AB495 is that benevolent.

It’s inevitable, they argue, that expanding the definition of “caregiver” would directly benefit people smugglers, kidnappers, and sex traffickers.

Leading the charge to save kids by killing the bill, Calvary Chapel Pastor Jack Hibbs said, the Democrat legislatures are once again trying to undermine parental rights.

AB495 sidesteps a parent’s rights entirely, Hibbs asserted, writing for Real Impact.

For example, all a person has to say is they were “unable to contact the parent(s) or other person(s) having legal custody of the minor at this time, to notify them of my intended authorisation.”

This allows for any adult who identifies as a “nonrelative extended family member” to claim custody of the child.

Effectively, that’s newspeak, Pastor Hibbs explained.

“Despite the name, this adult is not a family member at all — they could be any unrelated adult claiming to be connected to the child.”

Although this only applies to someone who identifies as a child’s “neighbour, teacher or family friend,” Hibbs continued, “anyone could falsely claim to fit one of these roles and assume legal authority over a child.”

AB495, he rightly concluded,  “lacks meaningful safeguards to protect children regardless of their immigration status and opens the door for exploitation by predators or traffickers.”

Higgs’ assessment is supported by legal eagles, Alliance Defending Freedom (ADF).

ADF formerly opposed the proposal on constitutional grounds, stating that AB495 “unjustifiably interferes with parents’ fundamental rights.”

Specifically, “the parents’ rights to choose which school their children attend and to make medical decisions concerning their minor children.”

The Democrat proposal also denies parents “due process, which is required by the US Constitution,” ADF remarked.

Rather than fixing perceived problems, AB495 is a Democrat recipe for dysfunction and disaster.

AB495 dangerously “swells the universe of individuals who can insert themselves between parent and child.” 

Consequently, ADF concluded, “the bill’s provisions are designed to exclude parents and keep them in the dark.”

“Their rights to shepherd and ensure their child is being properly cared for are being violated.”

Protesting the bill, Pastor Hibbs has called Christians and concerned Californians to join an August 19 rally outside the California State Capitol.

A flyer for the important event can be downloaded here.

Special Request:

For nearly eight years, we've highlighted issues ignored by mainstream media and resisted globalist ideologies eroding Western civilization. We've done this joyfully, without paywalls, despite personal costs to our team. Your support has kept us going, but operating costs exceed donations, forcing us to use ads. We’d love to ditch them, so we’re asking for your help. If you value our work, please consider supporting us via Stripe or PayPal. Every bit helps us keep fighting for our kids’ future. Thank you!

What's New?

Use the blue arrows at the bottom to scroll through the latest.
16-Year-Old Explains Why the Social Media Ban Won’t Work

16-Year-Old Explains Why the Social Media Ban Won’t Work

"There are three very prominent concerns when it comes to how this law will actually work and the repercussions it could have."
By
by Selah CampisiDec 15, 2025
Bondi Massacre: A Wake-Up Call for Australia

Bondi Massacre: A Wake-Up Call for Australia

"Without honest discourse, decisive policy, and recognition that not all cultures can coexist harmoniously, such attacks are likely to recur—just look at Europe today."
By
by Staff WriterDec 15, 2025
White Guilt is Dead

White Guilt is Dead

"For decades, White guilt has been used as a tool of social control—silencing dissent, suppressing legitimate demographic concerns, and guilt-tripping Westerners into accepting policies that no other civilisation on earth would tolerate."
By
by Staff WriterDec 13, 2025
Brave New Families: How State Power Is Replacing Parental Responsibility

Brave New Families: How State Power Is Replacing Parental Responsibility

“All I see is the dystopian Brave New future that are projections of our simplistic mechanistic leaders, which makes sense, given their godfather is Karl Marx, a determinist who has bred many of his kind after his image.”
By
by Dr Stephen FysonDec 12, 2025
When the State Becomes Co-Parent: Australia’s Intrusion into Family Life

When the State Becomes Co-Parent: Australia’s Intrusion into Family Life

"As the state once absorbed the moral and spiritual leadership of the Church over society, so too can it absorb the moral and spiritual authority of parents over their children."
By
by Staff WriterDec 11, 2025
Tarantino Ranks ‘The Passion of the Christ’ Among the Best Films of the Century

Tarantino Ranks ‘The Passion of the Christ’ Among the Best Films of the Century

“I think it actually is one of the most brilliant visual storytelling films ever made,” he said.
By
by Rod LampardDec 11, 2025
Truth Tax: Senate Dissenters Reject Albo’s FOI Amendments as a “Hubris-Driven Attack on Transparency”

Truth Tax: Senate Dissenters Reject Albo’s FOI Amendments as a “Hubris-Driven Attack on Transparency”

"The consensus from dissenters seems to be that this bill further distances the Australian government from the people its representatives are elected to serve."
By
by Rod LampardDec 10, 2025
Speech Rejected, Promiscuity Approved

Speech Rejected, Promiscuity Approved

"The question arises, while Candace Owens' verbalising conservative values is not in our nation's interest, Lily Philips' sleeping around with Australian men is?"
By
by Selah CampisiDec 9, 2025

Image

Support

If you value our work and would like to support us, you can do so by visiting our support page. Can’t find what you’re looking for? Visit our search page.

Copyright © 2025, Caldron Pool

Permissions

Everything published at Caldron Pool is protected by copyright and cannot be used and/or duplicated without prior written permission. Links and excerpts with full attribution are permitted. Published articles represent the opinions of the author and may not reflect the views of all contributors at Caldron Pool.

Caldron Pool does not condone the use of violence, threats, or intimidation for political or religious purposes. We strongly advocate for peaceful, respectful, and free communication and open debate without fear of reprisal or punishment.