Image

Democrats Propose Letting Any Adult Claim Legal Rights Over a Child, Raising Trafficking Fears

"Democrats want the definition of parent to include anyone 'with an established familial or mentoring relationship with the child, or with a relative of the child.'"

Any adult will be able to claim legal rights over a child if a new nightmare proposal passes in California. 

Named the Family Preparedness Plan Act (AB495), Democrats want the definition of parent to include anyone “with an established familial or mentoring relationship with the child, or with a relative of the child.”

Criticising the bill, California Family Council (CFC) said the proposals were a gift to human traffickers.

AB495 allows almost anyone to “assume decision-making authority over a child’s schooling.”

This includes decision-making about a child’s “medical care, without a court appearance, notarization, or biological parental signature.”

CFC also said that if AB495 becomes law, anyone who self-identifies as a child’s parent, referred to in the bill as a caregiver, will have the ability to enrol the child in a school and authorise medical procedures. 

Such as transgender mutilation surgery, dental and mental health treatments.

Additionally, schools will not be required to verify the “identity, relationship or legitimacy of the adult claiming to be a child’s caregiver.”

Defending its move to kill off key safeguards for parents and children, Democrats said the changes were about protecting immigrants.

AB495 is being sold as a counterweight to Trump’s widely popular “Americans First,” ICE initiatives.

According to supporters, ripping up current protections is about protecting children whose parents may be “unexpectedly detained or deported by federal immigration officials.”

Opponents are not convinced AB495 is that benevolent.

It’s inevitable, they argue, that expanding the definition of “caregiver” would directly benefit people smugglers, kidnappers, and sex traffickers.

Leading the charge to save kids by killing the bill, Calvary Chapel Pastor Jack Hibbs said, the Democrat legislatures are once again trying to undermine parental rights.

AB495 sidesteps a parent’s rights entirely, Hibbs asserted, writing for Real Impact.

For example, all a person has to say is they were “unable to contact the parent(s) or other person(s) having legal custody of the minor at this time, to notify them of my intended authorisation.”

This allows for any adult who identifies as a “nonrelative extended family member” to claim custody of the child.

Effectively, that’s newspeak, Pastor Hibbs explained.

“Despite the name, this adult is not a family member at all — they could be any unrelated adult claiming to be connected to the child.”

Although this only applies to someone who identifies as a child’s “neighbour, teacher or family friend,” Hibbs continued, “anyone could falsely claim to fit one of these roles and assume legal authority over a child.”

AB495, he rightly concluded,  “lacks meaningful safeguards to protect children regardless of their immigration status and opens the door for exploitation by predators or traffickers.”

Higgs’ assessment is supported by legal eagles, Alliance Defending Freedom (ADF).

ADF formerly opposed the proposal on constitutional grounds, stating that AB495 “unjustifiably interferes with parents’ fundamental rights.”

Specifically, “the parents’ rights to choose which school their children attend and to make medical decisions concerning their minor children.”

The Democrat proposal also denies parents “due process, which is required by the US Constitution,” ADF remarked.

Rather than fixing perceived problems, AB495 is a Democrat recipe for dysfunction and disaster.

AB495 dangerously “swells the universe of individuals who can insert themselves between parent and child.” 

Consequently, ADF concluded, “the bill’s provisions are designed to exclude parents and keep them in the dark.”

“Their rights to shepherd and ensure their child is being properly cared for are being violated.”

Protesting the bill, Pastor Hibbs has called Christians and concerned Californians to join an August 19 rally outside the California State Capitol.

A flyer for the important event can be downloaded here.

Special Request:

For nearly eight years, we've highlighted issues ignored by mainstream media and resisted globalist ideologies eroding Western civilization. We've done this joyfully, without paywalls, despite personal costs to our team. Your support has kept us going, but operating costs exceed donations, forcing us to use ads. We’d love to ditch them, so we’re asking for your help. If you value our work, please consider supporting us via Stripe or PayPal. Every bit helps us keep fighting for our kids’ future. Thank you!

What's New?

Use the blue arrows at the bottom to scroll through the latest.
Hate Speech Laws Are Just Blasphemy Laws

Hate Speech Laws Are Just Blasphemy Laws

"Blasphemy laws protect a society’s sacred object from verbal violation. Hate speech laws do the same, only the sacred object has changed. They are secularism’s answer to blasphemy law: enforcing reverence for the system’s ultimate values while denying that those values are religious at all."
By
by Staff WriterJan 15, 2026
Opposition Grows to Labor’s “Horrendous” Hate Speech Bill: “Worst Assault on Freedom Yet”

Opposition Grows to Labor’s “Horrendous” Hate Speech Bill: “Worst Assault on Freedom Yet”

Opposition to the federal government’s Combating Antisemitism, Hate and Extremism Bill 2026 is mounting across multiple parties, with MPs and senators warning that the rushed, broadly worded legislation threatens free speech, religious freedom and civil liberties while failing to address the causes of extremism.
By
by Staff WriterJan 15, 2026
Democrats Want Trump’s War Powers Limited Over a War With Venezuela That Doesn’t Exist

Democrats Want Trump’s War Powers Limited Over a War With Venezuela That Doesn’t Exist

“This Vote greatly hampers American self-defence and National Security, impeding the President’s Authority as Commander in Chief,” Trump wrote.
By
by Rod LampardJan 14, 2026
True Leaders Inspire Unity, Weak Men Legislate It

True Leaders Inspire Unity, Weak Men Legislate It

"Heavy-handed laws, by contrast, are a symptom of weakness—a last resort when authority has decayed, and coercion is all that remains."
By
by Staff WriterJan 13, 2026
Australians Sound Alarm Over New Draconian “Hate” Bill

Australians Sound Alarm Over New Draconian “Hate” Bill

"The Parliamentary Joint Committee on Intelligence and Security has allowed less than 48 hours for public submissions on the 144-page draft bill."
By
by Staff WriterJan 13, 2026
Hate Speech Laws Are an Admission of Government Failure

Hate Speech Laws Are an Admission of Government Failure

"Hate speech laws are evidence that our governments can no longer inspire loyalty, trust, or solidarity. They are an admission that policymakers have no unifying vision capable of bringing diverse people together voluntarily. So instead, they use force."
By
by Ben DavisJan 13, 2026
UK Leads Talks With Canada and Australia on Potential X Ban

UK Leads Talks With Canada and Australia on Potential X Ban

"Free communication has always posed a problem for those who seek to centralise authority. Open platforms like X allow claims to be challenged, narratives to be contested, and power to be scrutinised. That is precisely why they become targets when governments feel uncomfortable, embarrassed, or threatened."
By
by Staff WriterJan 12, 2026
Self-Regulation or State Control: How Society’s Moral Collapse Hands Government Power

Self-Regulation or State Control: How Society’s Moral Collapse Hands Government Power

"Public degeneracy doesn’t just corrode society, it empowers the state. Once enough people normalise moral disorder, government intervention stops being the exception and becomes the rule."
By
by Staff WriterJan 10, 2026

Image

Support

If you value our work and would like to support us, you can do so by visiting our support page. Can’t find what you’re looking for? Visit our search page.

Copyright © 2025, Caldron Pool

Permissions

Everything published at Caldron Pool is protected by copyright and cannot be used and/or duplicated without prior written permission. Links and excerpts with full attribution are permitted. Published articles represent the opinions of the author and may not reflect the views of all contributors at Caldron Pool.

Caldron Pool does not condone the use of violence, threats, or intimidation for political or religious purposes. We strongly advocate for peaceful, respectful, and free communication and open debate without fear of reprisal or punishment.