Image

Bombshell Documents Expose Political Origins of Melbourne’s Covid Curfew

"The public was misled, and it is time for Premier Andrews and his successor, Jacinta Allan, to answer for the damage caused."

Melbourne’s infamous Covid-19 curfew, enforced by Premier Daniel Andrews during the 2020 lockdowns, was not based on medical advice, according to documents obtained through a Freedom of Information (FOI) request.

The curfew, which restricted the movements of 5 million Melburnians from 8 pm to 5 am, was framed by the Andrews government as a necessary measure for public health. However, newly released FOI documents expose that it was not recommended by health experts but rather a decision made by the state’s crisis cabinet.

The documents, which have emerged after a four-and-a-half-year legal battle, include a critical email from Public Health Commander Dr. Finn Romanes. In the communication, Romanes writes: “The curfew… is not occurring on public health advice but is a decision taken by Cabinet.”

This revelation contradicts the narrative promoted by Premier Andrews, who at the time repeatedly claimed that the curfew was based on medical recommendations. When asked about the curfew’s origin in 2020, Andrews admitted that the decision was ultimately his but would not disclose who exactly conceived the idea.

The curfew, which lasted for two months, was a key part of Victoria’s draconian lockdown measures in 2020 and 2021. Melbourne was the only city in Australia to impose such restrictions. The government justified these measures as essential for protecting public health during the state’s worst Covid-19 outbreaks.

While health experts later expressed support for the curfew, they did not propose it. Emails between Sutton and Dr. Romanes reveal that the public health officials were merely following orders. Romanes, in his email, confirms that the public health direction on the curfew was “not occurring on public health advice but is a decision taken by Cabinet.” He goes on to clarify: “I have been advised by (Department of Justice and Community Safety secretary) Kate Houghton and others that the action of a curfew is a clear action within the State of Disaster and there is a clear desire within government to mirror that within the State of Emergency.”

Victorian opposition figures, including David Davis, who spearheaded the FOI request, have expressed outrage over the revelations. “This document confirms what many of us suspected—that the curfew was a political decision, not a public health one,” Davis said. “The public was misled, and it is time for Premier Andrews and his successor, Jacinta Allan, to answer for the damage caused.”

Jacinta Allan, who was part of the crisis cabinet that approved the curfew, remains the only member of the cabinet still serving in Parliament. Opposition leaders have called on her to explain her role in the decision.

Victoria’s current Health Minister, Mary-Anne Thomas, whose department fought the release of these documents, has since acknowledged that the decision to withhold the information was “wrong” but defended the intent of her department to protect confidential discussions.

Melbourne, Australia, endured six lockdowns between March 2020 and October 2021, totalling 262 days of strict stay-at-home orders, making it the city with the longest cumulative lockdown period globally, surpassing Buenos Aires (244 days).

Special Request:

For nearly eight years, we've highlighted issues ignored by mainstream media and resisted globalist ideologies eroding Western civilization. We've done this joyfully, without paywalls, despite personal costs to our team. Your support has kept us going, but operating costs exceed donations, forcing us to use ads. We’d love to ditch them, so we’re asking for your help. If you value our work, please consider supporting us via Stripe or PayPal. Every bit helps us keep fighting for our kids’ future. Thank you!

What's New?

Use the blue arrows at the bottom to scroll through the latest.
16-Year-Old Explains Why the Social Media Ban Won’t Work

16-Year-Old Explains Why the Social Media Ban Won’t Work

"There are three very prominent concerns when it comes to how this law will actually work and the repercussions it could have."
By
by Selah CampisiDec 15, 2025
Bondi Massacre: A Wake-Up Call for Australia

Bondi Massacre: A Wake-Up Call for Australia

"Without honest discourse, decisive policy, and recognition that not all cultures can coexist harmoniously, such attacks are likely to recur—just look at Europe today."
By
by Staff WriterDec 15, 2025
White Guilt is Dead

White Guilt is Dead

"For decades, White guilt has been used as a tool of social control—silencing dissent, suppressing legitimate demographic concerns, and guilt-tripping Westerners into accepting policies that no other civilisation on earth would tolerate."
By
by Staff WriterDec 13, 2025
Brave New Families: How State Power Is Replacing Parental Responsibility

Brave New Families: How State Power Is Replacing Parental Responsibility

“All I see is the dystopian Brave New future that are projections of our simplistic mechanistic leaders, which makes sense, given their godfather is Karl Marx, a determinist who has bred many of his kind after his image.”
By
by Dr Stephen FysonDec 12, 2025
When the State Becomes Co-Parent: Australia’s Intrusion into Family Life

When the State Becomes Co-Parent: Australia’s Intrusion into Family Life

"As the state once absorbed the moral and spiritual leadership of the Church over society, so too can it absorb the moral and spiritual authority of parents over their children."
By
by Staff WriterDec 11, 2025
Tarantino Ranks ‘The Passion of the Christ’ Among the Best Films of the Century

Tarantino Ranks ‘The Passion of the Christ’ Among the Best Films of the Century

“I think it actually is one of the most brilliant visual storytelling films ever made,” he said.
By
by Rod LampardDec 11, 2025
Truth Tax: Senate Dissenters Reject Albo’s FOI Amendments as a “Hubris-Driven Attack on Transparency”

Truth Tax: Senate Dissenters Reject Albo’s FOI Amendments as a “Hubris-Driven Attack on Transparency”

"The consensus from dissenters seems to be that this bill further distances the Australian government from the people its representatives are elected to serve."
By
by Rod LampardDec 10, 2025
Speech Rejected, Promiscuity Approved

Speech Rejected, Promiscuity Approved

"The question arises, while Candace Owens' verbalising conservative values is not in our nation's interest, Lily Philips' sleeping around with Australian men is?"
By
by Selah CampisiDec 9, 2025

Image

Support

If you value our work and would like to support us, you can do so by visiting our support page. Can’t find what you’re looking for? Visit our search page.

Copyright © 2025, Caldron Pool

Permissions

Everything published at Caldron Pool is protected by copyright and cannot be used and/or duplicated without prior written permission. Links and excerpts with full attribution are permitted. Published articles represent the opinions of the author and may not reflect the views of all contributors at Caldron Pool.

Caldron Pool does not condone the use of violence, threats, or intimidation for political or religious purposes. We strongly advocate for peaceful, respectful, and free communication and open debate without fear of reprisal or punishment.