Image

Appeals Court Clears Path to Defund Planned Parenthood: RFK Jnr Scores Huge Pro-Life Victory

“Trump's attempt to defund Planned Parenthood is free and clear after three circuit judges gave a lower court ban the boot.”

Trump’s attempt to defund Planned Parenthood is free and clear after three circuit judges gave a lower court ban the boot.

The legal win known as Planned Parenthood Federation of America et al v. Robert F. Kennedy Jr., et al, removes barriers put in place by a federal judge in July.

Removing taxpayer funding from the abortion mill was halted after the judge ordered Trump not to proceed with prohibiting payments to abortion providers.

Taking point, Robert F. Kennedy Jnr’s Make America Healthy Again office challenged the district court freeze. 

The Trump administration subsequently won.

Planned Parenthood had sued the MAGA administration to secure its long-held position in the lineup for taxpayer handouts.

They also took issue with being referred to as a “prohibited entity.”

Page 139 of Trump’s “Big Beautiful” – Tax and Spending bill – effectively denies the abortion milling conglomerate “eligibility for Medicaid reimbursements.”

Additionally, the language designates Planned Parenthood a “prohibited entity” when it comes to federal funding.

Listed under Section 71113, the bill (which is now law) states, 

“No federal funds shall be used to make payments to a prohibited entity, including its affiliates, subsidiaries, successors, and clinics.”

This includes 501 charitable organisations that are “primarily engaged in family planning services, ‘reproductive’ health, and related medical care; and who provide abortions.”

True to his lukewarm election gamble on abortion, the bill’s only exception to federal funding for an abortion is the self-defence of the mother.

As the next paragraph states, 

“Other than an abortion, if the pregnancy is the result of an act of rape or incest, or where a pregnancy places the woman in danger of death unless an abortion is performed.”

Reporting on the decision, the Christian Post recalled that Planned Parenthood took the legal action to protect its taxpayer-funded income, because without their abortion mills would have to close.

This is reflected in the ruling, which stated that only Planned Parenthood fit the four criteria for defunding.

Planned Parenthood then alleged they were singled out for punishment, which meant that defunding their ‘reproductive services’ (abortion) was “unconstitutional.”

This was, PP argued, “a violation of their equal protection rights because it treats them differently from other providers of abortion services based on a fundamental right: their association with Planned Parenthood’s national organisation and their fellow Members.”

The three circuit judges disagreed, and “vacated the district court’s preliminary injunctions.”

In their ruling, they refuted the “violation” claims, concluding that “no fundamental right had been violated.”

Neither is the Trump administration’s designation of Planned Parenthood “irrational.”

Responding to the court’s overturning of PP’s attempt to keep the money rolling in, Heartbeat International said, “The appeals court ruling is an important step forward.”

Conservative pundits such as Mark Levin and Dinesh D’Souza called the victory “huge.”

Replying to news that Trump had cut funding in July, pro-life news and views site Live Action reminded critics and supporters alike that, alongside abortions, Planned Parenthood was also offering ‘gender affirming care.’

This “included prescribing cross-sex hormones to minors.”

According to Live Action, PP’s last yearly income statement recorded the abortion factory “being handed over $800 million in taxpayer money, which included federal Medicaid funding.”

At the time, Live Action boss Lila Rose remarked, “Planned Parenthood is the nation’s largest abortion chain, ending over 400,000 lives annually while masking their business as healthcare.

“This defunding victory is a crucial step toward ending that injustice.” 

To this she added, “It’s only the beginning.”

“No taxpayer should ever be complicit in violence. Every mother deserves real support, and every child deserves the chance to live.”

Special Request:

For nearly eight years, we've highlighted issues ignored by mainstream media and resisted globalist ideologies eroding Western civilization. We've done this joyfully, without paywalls, despite personal costs to our team. Your support has kept us going, but operating costs exceed donations, forcing us to use ads. We’d love to ditch them, so we’re asking for your help. If you value our work, please consider supporting us via Stripe or PayPal. Every bit helps us keep fighting for our kids’ future. Thank you!

What's New?

Use the blue arrows at the bottom to scroll through the latest.
Hate Speech Laws Are Just Blasphemy Laws

Hate Speech Laws Are Just Blasphemy Laws

"Blasphemy laws protect a society’s sacred object from verbal violation. Hate speech laws do the same, only the sacred object has changed. They are secularism’s answer to blasphemy law: enforcing reverence for the system’s ultimate values while denying that those values are religious at all."
By
by Staff WriterJan 15, 2026
Opposition Grows to Labor’s “Horrendous” Hate Speech Bill: “Worst Assault on Freedom Yet”

Opposition Grows to Labor’s “Horrendous” Hate Speech Bill: “Worst Assault on Freedom Yet”

Opposition to the federal government’s Combating Antisemitism, Hate and Extremism Bill 2026 is mounting across multiple parties, with MPs and senators warning that the rushed, broadly worded legislation threatens free speech, religious freedom and civil liberties while failing to address the causes of extremism.
By
by Staff WriterJan 15, 2026
Democrats Want Trump’s War Powers Limited Over a War With Venezuela That Doesn’t Exist

Democrats Want Trump’s War Powers Limited Over a War With Venezuela That Doesn’t Exist

“This Vote greatly hampers American self-defence and National Security, impeding the President’s Authority as Commander in Chief,” Trump wrote.
By
by Rod LampardJan 14, 2026
True Leaders Inspire Unity, Weak Men Legislate It

True Leaders Inspire Unity, Weak Men Legislate It

"Heavy-handed laws, by contrast, are a symptom of weakness—a last resort when authority has decayed, and coercion is all that remains."
By
by Staff WriterJan 13, 2026
Australians Sound Alarm Over New Draconian “Hate” Bill

Australians Sound Alarm Over New Draconian “Hate” Bill

"The Parliamentary Joint Committee on Intelligence and Security has allowed less than 48 hours for public submissions on the 144-page draft bill."
By
by Staff WriterJan 13, 2026
Hate Speech Laws Are an Admission of Government Failure

Hate Speech Laws Are an Admission of Government Failure

"Hate speech laws are evidence that our governments can no longer inspire loyalty, trust, or solidarity. They are an admission that policymakers have no unifying vision capable of bringing diverse people together voluntarily. So instead, they use force."
By
by Ben DavisJan 13, 2026
UK Leads Talks With Canada and Australia on Potential X Ban

UK Leads Talks With Canada and Australia on Potential X Ban

"Free communication has always posed a problem for those who seek to centralise authority. Open platforms like X allow claims to be challenged, narratives to be contested, and power to be scrutinised. That is precisely why they become targets when governments feel uncomfortable, embarrassed, or threatened."
By
by Staff WriterJan 12, 2026
Self-Regulation or State Control: How Society’s Moral Collapse Hands Government Power

Self-Regulation or State Control: How Society’s Moral Collapse Hands Government Power

"Public degeneracy doesn’t just corrode society, it empowers the state. Once enough people normalise moral disorder, government intervention stops being the exception and becomes the rule."
By
by Staff WriterJan 10, 2026

Image

Support

If you value our work and would like to support us, you can do so by visiting our support page. Can’t find what you’re looking for? Visit our search page.

Copyright © 2025, Caldron Pool

Permissions

Everything published at Caldron Pool is protected by copyright and cannot be used and/or duplicated without prior written permission. Links and excerpts with full attribution are permitted. Published articles represent the opinions of the author and may not reflect the views of all contributors at Caldron Pool.

Caldron Pool does not condone the use of violence, threats, or intimidation for political or religious purposes. We strongly advocate for peaceful, respectful, and free communication and open debate without fear of reprisal or punishment.