Image

Anthony Fauci Is Funding Experiments on Aborted Baby Scalps and Livers

"These shocking revelations form part of an ongoing trend taking place in the once-Christian West. We have abandoned our conviction that every precious life is made in the image of God, and instead believing that unborn babies don’t have the same moral status as the rest of us."

This week, the non-profit Centre for Medical Progress (CMP) released a video report exposing the trafficking of aborted babies by the University of Pittsburg and Planned Parenthood, and their use of fetal tissue in barbaric lab experiments.

One of the most astonishing revelations in the report was that Dr Anthony Fauci, who has served as the chief medical advisor to Presidents Trump and Biden, is involved in the funding of these experiments through his role as the director of the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIAID). The report begins:

“The University of Pittsburg [‘Pitt’] is a hub for some of the most barbaric experiments carried out on late-term aborted human infants — experiments funded by the United States government. At the same time, the university sponsors the local Planned Parenthood abortion business in what looks like an illegal quid pro quo for fetal body parts.”

The video report can be viewed below, though viewer discretion is advised. Shown in the video are grisly photos of the scalps of five-month-old aborted babies grafted onto the backs of lab rats and the harvesting of aborted babies’ livers.

CMP reveals several funding streams for these experiments in the report. Nearly half a million dollars in research grants are provided by Dr Anthony Fauci’s National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIAID) office at the National Institute of Health (NIH).

In addition to this is a multi-year, $1.4 million grant provided to the University of Pittsburg by the taxpayer-funded NIH. “The grant makes Pitt a distribution hub for aborted fetal kidneys and other fetal body parts for NIH-funded projects across the country,” CMP reports.

While details about these specific experiments and their funding sources have only come to light recently, the CMP report explains that “fetal experimentation projects have been going on for decades, sometimes on babies born alive during later abortions”. As early as 1972, for example, a Pitt nurse testified before the Pennsylvania legislature that she saw “live fetuses from abortions being packed in ice and shipped off for experimentation at the university”.

The report exposed a web connecting the taxpayer-funded NIH, the University of Pittsburg, and Planned Parenthood of Western Pennsylvania. In short, NIH provides funds to the university; the university provides Planned Parenthood with access to medical resources and student information for referrals; and Planned Parenthood supplies aborted babies to the university for its research.

“Here’s what we know just from the publicly-available sources,” the video report summarises:

“One, Planned Parenthood abortionists supplied the aborted fetuses to Pitt. Two, Pitt uses its access to the fetuses to get major NIH grant money. Three, Pitt sends major kickbacks and medical resources back to Planned Parenthood. It all starts to look suspiciously like an illegal quid pro quo over aborted fetal organs and body parts, all funded by taxpayers.”

Planned Parenthood’s supply of aborted baby body parts is officially denied by the University of Pittsburg, who has told the media that they have “no procurement relationship for tissue with Planned Parenthood”. But in the video report, CMP provides footage of Planned Parenthood staff confessing that “there’s a tissue bank at Pitt that we offer [abortion] patients to donate to.”

Moreover, sources have told CMP that “Pittsburg was one of the major hubs of the FBI’s investigation of Planned Parenthood’s involvement in the human trafficking of aborted fetuses.”

These shocking revelations form part of an ongoing trend taking place in the once-Christian West. We have abandoned our conviction that every precious life is made in the image of God, instead believing that unborn babies don’t have the same moral status as the rest of us. Voltaire’s warning from centuries ago is prescient:

“Those who can make you believe absurdities can make you commit atrocities.”

We are moving towards a situation where people are dispensable, and where the humanity or ‘personhood’ of some is being arbitrarily decided by others. Francis Schaeffer also warned of this danger many decades ago:

“If there is no absolute moral standard, then one cannot say in a final sense that anything is right or wrong… If there is no absolute beyond man’s ideas, then there is no final appeal to judge between individuals and groups whose moral judgments conflict. We are merely left with conflicting opinions.”

Reflecting on the moral dilemma facing the West, atheist Douglas Murray has made a stunning observation:

“The more atheists think on these things, the more we may have to accept that the concept of the sanctity of human life is a Judeo-Christian notion which might very easily not survive Judeo-Christian civilisation. Those who do not believe in God and who stare over that cliff… may realise that only three options remain open to us.

“The first option is to fall into the furnace. Another is to work furiously to nail down an atheist version of the sanctity of the individual. If that does not work, then there is only one other place to go. Which is back to faith, whether we like it or not.”

Murray is right. And given that his first two options provide little promise, it is evident that nations like the United States and Australia must return to their Christian foundations.

If you would like to speak up about the trafficking and barbaric experimentations taking place in Pittsburg, you can sign the Open Letter to Pitt: Stop Experimenting with Aborted Babies.

Originally published at the Canberra Declaration.

Special Request:

For nearly eight years, we've highlighted issues ignored by mainstream media and resisted globalist ideologies eroding Western civilization. We've done this joyfully, without paywalls, despite personal costs to our team. Your support has kept us going, but operating costs exceed donations, forcing us to use ads. We’d love to ditch them, so we’re asking for your help. If you value our work, please consider supporting us via Stripe or PayPal. Every bit helps us keep fighting for our kids’ future. Thank you!

What's New?

Use the blue arrows at the bottom to scroll through the latest.
Kathleen Kennedy Steps Down: Will Lucasfilm Recapture the Magic Without the DEI Drama?

Kathleen Kennedy Steps Down: Will Lucasfilm Recapture the Magic Without the DEI Drama?

“Although absent from Forbes’ list of Kennedy foibles, few incidents illustrate them as blatantly as the firing of conservative Gina Carano.”
By
by Rod LampardJan 20, 2026
Far From Over: 98% of Antisemitism Bill Still Stands, Freedom Advocates Issue Warning

Far From Over: 98% of Antisemitism Bill Still Stands, Freedom Advocates Issue Warning

"The Australian Government’s proposed antisemitism legislation remains largely unchanged, with only a small portion removed following public backlash."
By
by Staff WriterJan 19, 2026
Echoes of Eden

Echoes of Eden

"The enemies of Christ infiltrated the garden of Christendom and asked its heirs, 'Hath God said?' We ate. And today, we are suffering the consequences."
By
by Ben DavisJan 19, 2026
Final 130 Christian Children Freed After Month in Islamist Captivity in Nigeria

Final 130 Christian Children Freed After Month in Islamist Captivity in Nigeria

"Armed 'bandits' took 315 students and 12 staff members from Papiri’s St Mary's Catholic School captive in late November."
By
by Rod LampardJan 17, 2026
A Government That Won’t Acknowledge Christianity Can’t Defend the Nation

A Government That Won’t Acknowledge Christianity Can’t Defend the Nation

"By refusing to name its own moral foundations, the state undermines its ability to openly distinguish between belief systems that can coexist within its legal and moral order and those that fundamentally conflict with them. A society that cannot articulate its core moral commitments cannot coherently defend them."
By
by Staff WriterJan 16, 2026
Hate Speech Laws Are Just Blasphemy Laws

Hate Speech Laws Are Just Blasphemy Laws

"Blasphemy laws protect a society’s sacred object from verbal violation. Hate speech laws do the same, only the sacred object has changed. They are secularism’s answer to blasphemy law: enforcing reverence for the system’s ultimate values while denying that those values are religious at all."
By
by Staff WriterJan 15, 2026
Opposition Grows to Labor’s “Horrendous” Hate Speech Bill: “Worst Assault on Freedom Yet”

Opposition Grows to Labor’s “Horrendous” Hate Speech Bill: “Worst Assault on Freedom Yet”

Opposition to the federal government’s Combating Antisemitism, Hate and Extremism Bill 2026 is mounting across multiple parties, with MPs and senators warning that the rushed, broadly worded legislation threatens free speech, religious freedom and civil liberties while failing to address the causes of extremism.
By
by Staff WriterJan 15, 2026
Democrats Want Trump’s War Powers Limited Over a War With Venezuela That Doesn’t Exist

Democrats Want Trump’s War Powers Limited Over a War With Venezuela That Doesn’t Exist

“This Vote greatly hampers American self-defence and National Security, impeding the President’s Authority as Commander in Chief,” Trump wrote.
By
by Rod LampardJan 14, 2026

Image

Support

If you value our work and would like to support us, you can do so by visiting our support page. Can’t find what you’re looking for? Visit our search page.

Copyright © 2025, Caldron Pool

Permissions

Everything published at Caldron Pool is protected by copyright and cannot be used and/or duplicated without prior written permission. Links and excerpts with full attribution are permitted. Published articles represent the opinions of the author and may not reflect the views of all contributors at Caldron Pool.

Caldron Pool does not condone the use of violence, threats, or intimidation for political or religious purposes. We strongly advocate for peaceful, respectful, and free communication and open debate without fear of reprisal or punishment.