Image

Albanese Says He’d Ban All Australians from Accessing Social Media If He Were Dictator in Resurfaced Clip

"The clip resurfaced after the Australian Government this week introduced a proposed online 'misinformation' bill and announced plans to ban all teenagers under 16 from accessing social media."

Australian Prime Minister Anthony Albanese has said if he were “dictator” he would ban Australians from accessing social media.

Albanese made the comments while speaking with 3AW radio host Neil Mitchell back in August 2023 after he was asked what he would do if he held a five-year-long dictatorship over the nation.

The Prime Minister, while clarifying that he doesn’t support dictatorships, admitted, “The most frustrating thing—if I could do something, maybe I’d ban social media.”

When asked what bothers him about social media, Albanese said, “a couple of things,” noting the freedom with which people can post comments without “fear.”

Albanese said, “One [thing that worries me] is keyboard warriors who can anonymously say anything that all without any fear — the sort of things that they would never say to you face to face.”

The 2023 clip resurfaced after the Australian Government this week introduced a proposed online “misinformation” bill.

Communications Minister Michelle Rowland presented the legislation to Parliament on Thursday, arguing that misinformation and disinformation represent a “serious threat” to the safety and wellbeing of Australians, as well as to the nation’s democracy, society, and economy.

An analysis by the Institute of Public Affairs highlighted a number of serious flaws in the new legislation, describing it as “the single biggest attack on freedom of speech in Australia’s peacetime history.”

The Australian Government also this week announced plans to ban all teenagers under 16 from accessing social media, with the Prime Minister saying the legislation will override parental consent.

The move has faced criticism online, with many concerned that the only way the government could enforce such legislation is by requiring users to verify their age by linking their identification to every social media account — a plan floated back in 2022 under the guise of ending online anonymity and cracking down on “social media abuse.”

Special Request:

For nearly eight years, we've highlighted issues ignored by mainstream media and resisted globalist ideologies eroding Western civilization. We've done this joyfully, without paywalls, despite personal costs to our team. Your support has kept us going, but operating costs exceed donations, forcing us to use ads. We’d love to ditch them, so we’re asking for your help. If you value our work, please consider supporting us via Stripe or PayPal. Every bit helps us keep fighting for our kids’ future. Thank you!

What's New?

Use the blue arrows at the bottom to scroll through the latest.
16-Year-Old Explains Why the Social Media Ban Won’t Work

16-Year-Old Explains Why the Social Media Ban Won’t Work

"There are three very prominent concerns when it comes to how this law will actually work and the repercussions it could have."
By
by Selah CampisiDec 15, 2025
Bondi Massacre: A Wake-Up Call for Australia

Bondi Massacre: A Wake-Up Call for Australia

"Without honest discourse, decisive policy, and recognition that not all cultures can coexist harmoniously, such attacks are likely to recur—just look at Europe today."
By
by Staff WriterDec 15, 2025
White Guilt is Dead

White Guilt is Dead

"For decades, White guilt has been used as a tool of social control—silencing dissent, suppressing legitimate demographic concerns, and guilt-tripping Westerners into accepting policies that no other civilisation on earth would tolerate."
By
by Staff WriterDec 13, 2025
Brave New Families: How State Power Is Replacing Parental Responsibility

Brave New Families: How State Power Is Replacing Parental Responsibility

“All I see is the dystopian Brave New future that are projections of our simplistic mechanistic leaders, which makes sense, given their godfather is Karl Marx, a determinist who has bred many of his kind after his image.”
By
by Dr Stephen FysonDec 12, 2025
When the State Becomes Co-Parent: Australia’s Intrusion into Family Life

When the State Becomes Co-Parent: Australia’s Intrusion into Family Life

"As the state once absorbed the moral and spiritual leadership of the Church over society, so too can it absorb the moral and spiritual authority of parents over their children."
By
by Staff WriterDec 11, 2025
Tarantino Ranks ‘The Passion of the Christ’ Among the Best Films of the Century

Tarantino Ranks ‘The Passion of the Christ’ Among the Best Films of the Century

“I think it actually is one of the most brilliant visual storytelling films ever made,” he said.
By
by Rod LampardDec 11, 2025
Truth Tax: Senate Dissenters Reject Albo’s FOI Amendments as a “Hubris-Driven Attack on Transparency”

Truth Tax: Senate Dissenters Reject Albo’s FOI Amendments as a “Hubris-Driven Attack on Transparency”

"The consensus from dissenters seems to be that this bill further distances the Australian government from the people its representatives are elected to serve."
By
by Rod LampardDec 10, 2025
Speech Rejected, Promiscuity Approved

Speech Rejected, Promiscuity Approved

"The question arises, while Candace Owens' verbalising conservative values is not in our nation's interest, Lily Philips' sleeping around with Australian men is?"
By
by Selah CampisiDec 9, 2025

Image

Support

If you value our work and would like to support us, you can do so by visiting our support page. Can’t find what you’re looking for? Visit our search page.

Copyright © 2025, Caldron Pool

Permissions

Everything published at Caldron Pool is protected by copyright and cannot be used and/or duplicated without prior written permission. Links and excerpts with full attribution are permitted. Published articles represent the opinions of the author and may not reflect the views of all contributors at Caldron Pool.

Caldron Pool does not condone the use of violence, threats, or intimidation for political or religious purposes. We strongly advocate for peaceful, respectful, and free communication and open debate without fear of reprisal or punishment.