Image

Wrongfully Arrested Street Preacher to Sue Police After They Admitted “She Refused to Take the Bait” When “Goaded” By Hecklers

The officer admitted, "at no point do you hear her make any homophobic or racist remarks against anyone... She at no point during the recording is calling for the stabbing or murder of any group based on their lack of religious belief."

A female street preacher in the UK is set to sue the Metropolitan Police following an 18-month legal battle to clear her name after she was falsely accused of threatening to stab non-Christians.

Hazel Lewis was arrested while preaching outside Finsbury Park tube station on February 12, 2020, after three members of the public told police that she had called for sinners to be stabbed, Christian Concern reported.

The 49-year-old was arrested under Section 4 of the Public Order Act for allegedly making homophobic and racist comments, before police changed the charges to a breach of Section 5 of the Public Order Act, accusing her of causing harassment, alarm, and distress.

During her arrest, members of the public could be heard telling the police that Lewis had done nothing wrong.

Lewis told the officers she made no such comments and was able to provide an audio recording as proof.

According to Christianity Today, “when the case went to trial last month, the court heard the witness statement of a police officer who reviewed the audio recording and concluded that a member of the public appeared to be ‘goading’ her to comment on homosexuality but she had ‘refused to take the bait.'”

The officer admitted, “at no point do you hear her make any homophobic or racist remarks against anyone… She at no point during the recording is calling for the stabbing or murder of any group based on their lack of religious belief.”

District Judge Julia Newton ruled there was no evidence of distress and Lewis had no case to answer.

Lewis, who now intends on launching legal action against the police said, “It has taken nearly 18 months, but I am delighted that the judge has seen through the lies and has vindicated me.

“When police arrived, despite me telling them that the allegations were false, they still arrested me without any evidence other than from members of the public who wanted to silence me and twist what I was saying,” Lewis said.

“In custody, I told the arresting officer that I had forgiven him. I was not shocked, however, that despite the evidence on my phone that they still charged me. Street preachers are currently easy targets for the police and too many of us are unlawfully being fined, arrested, and prosecuted instead of receiving equal protection and support all law-abiding citizens are entitled to and should be confident in expecting.”

Lewis said she’s concerned about what might have happened had she not been able to provide a recording of the incident, saying: “It seemed that they were determined to prosecute me no matter what.”

“All I was doing was preaching the gospel of Jesus Christ, and I was arrested for it,” she said. “There are dangers out on the streets – I have had urine thrown at me and have been threatened, but Christians are called to preach the gospel of salvation and hope in any situation, no matter how tough, so I am not afraid.”

Andrea Williams, chief executive of the Christian Legal Centre, said since the turn of the century there has been a concerning escalation in street preacher arrests despite strong legal precedents being set in defence of their freedoms.

“It is chilling that one false accusation to the police can see a woman preaching on her own handcuffed, arrested and prosecuted,” Williams said.

“The police were determined to charge her no matter what the evidence, and we are relieved that the courts have seen through it.”

Lewis said despite the ordeal, she’s determined to continue preaching.

Special Request:

For nearly eight years, we've highlighted issues ignored by mainstream media and resisted globalist ideologies eroding Western civilization. We've done this joyfully, without paywalls, despite personal costs to our team. Your support has kept us going, but operating costs exceed donations, forcing us to use ads. We’d love to ditch them, so we’re asking for your help. If you value our work, please consider supporting us via Stripe or PayPal. Every bit helps us keep fighting for our kids’ future. Thank you!

What's New?

Use the blue arrows at the bottom to scroll through the latest.
Hate Speech Laws Are Just Blasphemy Laws

Hate Speech Laws Are Just Blasphemy Laws

"Blasphemy laws protect a society’s sacred object from verbal violation. Hate speech laws do the same, only the sacred object has changed. They are secularism’s answer to blasphemy law: enforcing reverence for the system’s ultimate values while denying that those values are religious at all."
By
by Staff WriterJan 15, 2026
Opposition Grows to Labor’s “Horrendous” Hate Speech Bill: “Worst Assault on Freedom Yet”

Opposition Grows to Labor’s “Horrendous” Hate Speech Bill: “Worst Assault on Freedom Yet”

Opposition to the federal government’s Combating Antisemitism, Hate and Extremism Bill 2026 is mounting across multiple parties, with MPs and senators warning that the rushed, broadly worded legislation threatens free speech, religious freedom and civil liberties while failing to address the causes of extremism.
By
by Staff WriterJan 15, 2026
Democrats Want Trump’s War Powers Limited Over a War With Venezuela That Doesn’t Exist

Democrats Want Trump’s War Powers Limited Over a War With Venezuela That Doesn’t Exist

“This Vote greatly hampers American self-defence and National Security, impeding the President’s Authority as Commander in Chief,” Trump wrote.
By
by Rod LampardJan 14, 2026
True Leaders Inspire Unity, Weak Men Legislate It

True Leaders Inspire Unity, Weak Men Legislate It

"Heavy-handed laws, by contrast, are a symptom of weakness—a last resort when authority has decayed, and coercion is all that remains."
By
by Staff WriterJan 13, 2026
Australians Sound Alarm Over New Draconian “Hate” Bill

Australians Sound Alarm Over New Draconian “Hate” Bill

"The Parliamentary Joint Committee on Intelligence and Security has allowed less than 48 hours for public submissions on the 144-page draft bill."
By
by Staff WriterJan 13, 2026
Hate Speech Laws Are an Admission of Government Failure

Hate Speech Laws Are an Admission of Government Failure

"Hate speech laws are evidence that our governments can no longer inspire loyalty, trust, or solidarity. They are an admission that policymakers have no unifying vision capable of bringing diverse people together voluntarily. So instead, they use force."
By
by Ben DavisJan 13, 2026
UK Leads Talks With Canada and Australia on Potential X Ban

UK Leads Talks With Canada and Australia on Potential X Ban

"Free communication has always posed a problem for those who seek to centralise authority. Open platforms like X allow claims to be challenged, narratives to be contested, and power to be scrutinised. That is precisely why they become targets when governments feel uncomfortable, embarrassed, or threatened."
By
by Staff WriterJan 12, 2026
Self-Regulation or State Control: How Society’s Moral Collapse Hands Government Power

Self-Regulation or State Control: How Society’s Moral Collapse Hands Government Power

"Public degeneracy doesn’t just corrode society, it empowers the state. Once enough people normalise moral disorder, government intervention stops being the exception and becomes the rule."
By
by Staff WriterJan 10, 2026

Image

Support

If you value our work and would like to support us, you can do so by visiting our support page. Can’t find what you’re looking for? Visit our search page.

Copyright © 2025, Caldron Pool

Permissions

Everything published at Caldron Pool is protected by copyright and cannot be used and/or duplicated without prior written permission. Links and excerpts with full attribution are permitted. Published articles represent the opinions of the author and may not reflect the views of all contributors at Caldron Pool.

Caldron Pool does not condone the use of violence, threats, or intimidation for political or religious purposes. We strongly advocate for peaceful, respectful, and free communication and open debate without fear of reprisal or punishment.