Image

When Loving the Foreigner Is a Cloak for Hating Your Neighbour

"By redefining 'neighbour,' they cover their refusal to practically care for those closest to them by feigning a concern for the foreigner who just so happens to be forever out of their reach."

A 2019 study titled “Ideological differences in the expanse of the moral circle” examined how political ideology shapes moral concern. In the study, participants allocated 100 “moral units” across 16 concentric circles, from immediate family to all things in existence.

Researchers then used heatmaps to show how participants with different political beliefs prioritise their moral priorities. The circles are layers of concern that expand outward from the self. Each ring represents a category that a person might care about.

Here are the 16 levels, from closest to farthest:

  1. Immediate family
  2. Extended family
  3. Closest friends
  4. All friends (even distant ones)
  5. Acquaintances
  6. People you’ve met
  7. Everyone in your country
  8. Everyone on your continent
  9. Everyone on Earth
  10. All mammals
  11. All animals with backbones (including reptiles, fish, and birds)
  12. All animals, even microscopic ones
  13. All animals in the universe, including aliens
  14. All living things, including plants
  15. All natural things, even rocks
  16. Everything in existence

The study found that conservatives tend to exhibit a steeper gradient, placing greater moral obligation on those closest to them—family, community, and nation—whereas liberals often display a flatter distribution, extending comparable concern to distant others, including strangers and foreign groups.

When it comes to ordered affections, Liberals displayed the exact inverse of Christianity. As finite beings, humans are incapable of loving all people equally. While Christians are commanded to love others, the love required of us is not a levelling love that erases all distinctions and priorities. It is a love expressed through action, not just sentiment.

As noted before, we are called to love God above all else. A husband should love his wife uniquely and more deeply than he loves his neighbour’s wife. Parents are meant to love their children more and in a distinct way than they love other children. As such, our ability to love and understand one another is limited. Therefore, the Bible presents a hierarchy of affections (Ordo Amoris), and if this order is disrupted or inverted, it will negatively impact all other relationships.

If loving your spouse leads to neglecting your love for God, you are not truly loving your spouse. If loving your children causes you to neglect your love for your spouse, you are not truly loving your children. If loving your fellow Christian means neglecting your love for your family, you are not truly loving your fellow Christian. If loving the foreigner results in neglecting your love for your neighbour, you are not truly loving the foreigner.

By following God’s divine order, our love is properly directed and blesses those within our sphere of responsibility. As such, marriage bonds, family ties—and by extension, national ties—remain important. This is not a negative aspect of life; rather, it is an inherent part of the human experience. It is not a sinful desire to be suppressed, but a good and godly desire to be redeemed for the benefit of those we are called and capable of caring for.

In other words, Christianity teaches that love and responsibility begin at home and radiate outward—from household to brother to neighbour, then to the broader world. When this natural order is inverted—when someone shows more concern for the distant foreigner than for their nearby neighbour—it is usually a cloak for something else.

Often, ‘liberals’ care more, in theory, for the foreigner than for their neighbour because they hate God, despise the image of God, and thus, hate their neighbour. Of course, they won’t always admit that. Sin often cloaks itself in false virtue. So, by redefining “neighbour,” they cover their refusal to practically care for those closest to them by feigning a concern for the foreigner who just so happens to be forever out of their reach.

They then invoke their false virtue and feigned concern to scold anyone as “un-Christian” if they do not affirm their inverted moral order. This irrational hatred is so strong and so entrenched that they’d watch their own nation burn and their own people destroyed before obeying Christ’s command to “love your neighbour as yourself.” The current miserable state of the Western world is proof of that.

Special Request:

For nearly eight years, we've highlighted issues ignored by mainstream media and resisted globalist ideologies eroding Western civilization. We've done this joyfully, without paywalls, despite personal costs to our team. Your support has kept us going, but operating costs exceed donations, forcing us to use ads. We’d love to ditch them, so we’re asking for your help. If you value our work, please consider supporting us via Stripe or PayPal. Every bit helps us keep fighting for our kids’ future. Thank you!

What's New?

Use the blue arrows at the bottom to scroll through the latest.
Convicted Terrorist to Serve in UK Government — Only in Modern Britain

Convicted Terrorist to Serve in UK Government — Only in Modern Britain

"At some point, Britain will have to decide whether it wants to be something—or nothing. Whether it wants to be a country with a shared inheritance, or merely a geographic space where incompatible worldviews coexist until they no longer can."
By
by Staff WriterFeb 4, 2026
Social Media Bans for Under-16s: Helpful Reform or Misplaced Hope?

Social Media Bans for Under-16s: Helpful Reform or Misplaced Hope?

Will banning social media accounts for under-16s meaningfully improve the wellbeing of young people?
By
by Dr Stephen FysonFeb 3, 2026
Petra Rocks Back to Life: Legendary Band Drops ‘Hope’ After 20 Year Studio Hiatus

Petra Rocks Back to Life: Legendary Band Drops ‘Hope’ After 20 Year Studio Hiatus

"After signing off in an era-ending 2005 farewell, the band just surprised the world with ‘Hope.’"
By
by Rod LampardFeb 2, 2026
Christianity Endured Decades of Hate Without Hate Speech Protections, And There’s a Reason Why

Christianity Endured Decades of Hate Without Hate Speech Protections, And There’s a Reason Why

“The only ideas that demand the sword of the state for protection are those that cannot stand on their own, those that crumble under scrutiny, criticism, or challenge.”
By
by Staff WriterFeb 2, 2026
Evolution is Dead, But Its Corpse Will Hang Around A While

Evolution is Dead, But Its Corpse Will Hang Around A While

“Genetics has now demonstrated that the mechanisms that have been proposed to drive evolution by natural selection cannot have possibly done so.”
By
by Matthew LittlefieldJan 31, 2026
Spain Grants Legal Status to Half a Million Migrants to “Fight the Far-Right”

Spain Grants Legal Status to Half a Million Migrants to “Fight the Far-Right”

"By framing the mass introduction of migrants as an instrument to counter political opponents, authorities have confirmed a suspicion long held by many across the Western world: that large-scale population movements are not treated as a humanitarian necessity, but as a political weapon against Nationalism."
By
by Staff WriterJan 30, 2026
Why Voters Are Abandoning the Liberals for One Nation

Why Voters Are Abandoning the Liberals for One Nation

“Australians aren't looking for a softer political version of what they're already suffering under. They are looking for an alternative.”
By
by Staff WriterJan 30, 2026
First the Imams, Then the Pastors

First the Imams, Then the Pastors

"Without formally recognising Christianity, accrediting imams today easily becomes accrediting pastors tomorrow. From there, it is a small step to state-sanctioned sermons, state-issued Bibles, state-regulated songs, and state-approved prayers."
By
by Staff WriterJan 29, 2026

Image

Support

If you value our work and would like to support us, you can do so by visiting our support page. Can’t find what you’re looking for? Visit our search page.

Copyright © 2025, Caldron Pool

Permissions

Everything published at Caldron Pool is protected by copyright and cannot be used and/or duplicated without prior written permission. Links and excerpts with full attribution are permitted. Published articles represent the opinions of the author and may not reflect the views of all contributors at Caldron Pool.

Caldron Pool does not condone the use of violence, threats, or intimidation for political or religious purposes. We strongly advocate for peaceful, respectful, and free communication and open debate without fear of reprisal or punishment.