Image

When Loving the Foreigner Is a Cloak for Hating Your Neighbour

"By redefining 'neighbour,' they cover their refusal to practically care for those closest to them by feigning a concern for the foreigner who just so happens to be forever out of their reach."

A 2019 study titled “Ideological differences in the expanse of the moral circle” examined how political ideology shapes moral concern. In the study, participants allocated 100 “moral units” across 16 concentric circles, from immediate family to all things in existence.

Researchers then used heatmaps to show how participants with different political beliefs prioritise their moral priorities. The circles are layers of concern that expand outward from the self. Each ring represents a category that a person might care about.

Here are the 16 levels, from closest to farthest:

  1. Immediate family
  2. Extended family
  3. Closest friends
  4. All friends (even distant ones)
  5. Acquaintances
  6. People you’ve met
  7. Everyone in your country
  8. Everyone on your continent
  9. Everyone on Earth
  10. All mammals
  11. All animals with backbones (including reptiles, fish, and birds)
  12. All animals, even microscopic ones
  13. All animals in the universe, including aliens
  14. All living things, including plants
  15. All natural things, even rocks
  16. Everything in existence

The study found that conservatives tend to exhibit a steeper gradient, placing greater moral obligation on those closest to them—family, community, and nation—whereas liberals often display a flatter distribution, extending comparable concern to distant others, including strangers and foreign groups.

When it comes to ordered affections, Liberals displayed the exact inverse of Christianity. As finite beings, humans are incapable of loving all people equally. While Christians are commanded to love others, the love required of us is not a levelling love that erases all distinctions and priorities. It is a love expressed through action, not just sentiment.

As noted before, we are called to love God above all else. A husband should love his wife uniquely and more deeply than he loves his neighbour’s wife. Parents are meant to love their children more and in a distinct way than they love other children. As such, our ability to love and understand one another is limited. Therefore, the Bible presents a hierarchy of affections (Ordo Amoris), and if this order is disrupted or inverted, it will negatively impact all other relationships.

If loving your spouse leads to neglecting your love for God, you are not truly loving your spouse. If loving your children causes you to neglect your love for your spouse, you are not truly loving your children. If loving your fellow Christian means neglecting your love for your family, you are not truly loving your fellow Christian. If loving the foreigner results in neglecting your love for your neighbour, you are not truly loving the foreigner.

By following God’s divine order, our love is properly directed and blesses those within our sphere of responsibility. As such, marriage bonds, family ties—and by extension, national ties—remain important. This is not a negative aspect of life; rather, it is an inherent part of the human experience. It is not a sinful desire to be suppressed, but a good and godly desire to be redeemed for the benefit of those we are called and capable of caring for.

In other words, Christianity teaches that love and responsibility begin at home and radiate outward—from household to brother to neighbour, then to the broader world. When this natural order is inverted—when someone shows more concern for the distant foreigner than for their nearby neighbour—it is usually a cloak for something else.

Often, ‘liberals’ care more, in theory, for the foreigner than for their neighbour because they hate God, despise the image of God, and thus, hate their neighbour. Of course, they won’t always admit that. Sin often cloaks itself in false virtue. So, by redefining “neighbour,” they cover their refusal to practically care for those closest to them by feigning a concern for the foreigner who just so happens to be forever out of their reach.

They then invoke their false virtue and feigned concern to scold anyone as “un-Christian” if they do not affirm their inverted moral order. This irrational hatred is so strong and so entrenched that they’d watch their own nation burn and their own people destroyed before obeying Christ’s command to “love your neighbour as yourself.” The current miserable state of the Western world is proof of that.

Special Request:

For nearly eight years, we've highlighted issues ignored by mainstream media and resisted globalist ideologies eroding Western civilization. We've done this joyfully, without paywalls, despite personal costs to our team. Your support has kept us going, but operating costs exceed donations, forcing us to use ads. We’d love to ditch them, so we’re asking for your help. If you value our work, please consider supporting us via Stripe or PayPal. Every bit helps us keep fighting for our kids’ future. Thank you!

What's New?

Use the blue arrows at the bottom to scroll through the latest.
16-Year-Old Explains Why the Social Media Ban Won’t Work

16-Year-Old Explains Why the Social Media Ban Won’t Work

"There are three very prominent concerns when it comes to how this law will actually work and the repercussions it could have."
By
by Selah CampisiDec 15, 2025
Bondi Massacre: A Wake-Up Call for Australia

Bondi Massacre: A Wake-Up Call for Australia

"Without honest discourse, decisive policy, and recognition that not all cultures can coexist harmoniously, such attacks are likely to recur—just look at Europe today."
By
by Staff WriterDec 15, 2025
White Guilt is Dead

White Guilt is Dead

"For decades, White guilt has been used as a tool of social control—silencing dissent, suppressing legitimate demographic concerns, and guilt-tripping Westerners into accepting policies that no other civilisation on earth would tolerate."
By
by Staff WriterDec 13, 2025
Brave New Families: How State Power Is Replacing Parental Responsibility

Brave New Families: How State Power Is Replacing Parental Responsibility

“All I see is the dystopian Brave New future that are projections of our simplistic mechanistic leaders, which makes sense, given their godfather is Karl Marx, a determinist who has bred many of his kind after his image.”
By
by Dr Stephen FysonDec 12, 2025
When the State Becomes Co-Parent: Australia’s Intrusion into Family Life

When the State Becomes Co-Parent: Australia’s Intrusion into Family Life

"As the state once absorbed the moral and spiritual leadership of the Church over society, so too can it absorb the moral and spiritual authority of parents over their children."
By
by Staff WriterDec 11, 2025
Tarantino Ranks ‘The Passion of the Christ’ Among the Best Films of the Century

Tarantino Ranks ‘The Passion of the Christ’ Among the Best Films of the Century

“I think it actually is one of the most brilliant visual storytelling films ever made,” he said.
By
by Rod LampardDec 11, 2025
Truth Tax: Senate Dissenters Reject Albo’s FOI Amendments as a “Hubris-Driven Attack on Transparency”

Truth Tax: Senate Dissenters Reject Albo’s FOI Amendments as a “Hubris-Driven Attack on Transparency”

"The consensus from dissenters seems to be that this bill further distances the Australian government from the people its representatives are elected to serve."
By
by Rod LampardDec 10, 2025
Speech Rejected, Promiscuity Approved

Speech Rejected, Promiscuity Approved

"The question arises, while Candace Owens' verbalising conservative values is not in our nation's interest, Lily Philips' sleeping around with Australian men is?"
By
by Selah CampisiDec 9, 2025

Image

Support

If you value our work and would like to support us, you can do so by visiting our support page. Can’t find what you’re looking for? Visit our search page.

Copyright © 2025, Caldron Pool

Permissions

Everything published at Caldron Pool is protected by copyright and cannot be used and/or duplicated without prior written permission. Links and excerpts with full attribution are permitted. Published articles represent the opinions of the author and may not reflect the views of all contributors at Caldron Pool.

Caldron Pool does not condone the use of violence, threats, or intimidation for political or religious purposes. We strongly advocate for peaceful, respectful, and free communication and open debate without fear of reprisal or punishment.