Image

Were Conservatives Wrong About Identity Politics?

"Every group practices in-group loyalty, every community defends its interests, every people invest in their continuity—except one. Ignoring this reality ensured our own inevitable decline."

For decades, “identity politics” has been a target of conservative critique. Conservative commentators have long warned against the political approach that elevates group identity, such as race, sex, religion, or sexuality, above individual character, shared citizenship, and equal treatment under the law.

They argue that it replaces personal responsibility with inherited status, fragments national unity into competing sub-groups, and justifies unequal treatment in the name of fairness. Rather than encouraging merit, civic values, or cohesion, identity politics entrenches division, incentivises victimhood, and undermines equal citizenship.

At its core, identity politics “exploits” a universal human instinct: tribalism. Humans naturally organise into groups, such as family, ethnic, religious, or cultural, and defend their collective interests. This instinct is neither inherently good nor bad; its consequences depend entirely on how it is harnessed.

For years, identity politics has been leveraged against the “straight, white, Christian,” and conservatives were correct to identify the threat. But the prescribed remedy, namely abandoning their own identity altogether, was catastrophic. We were told to dissolve our sense of shared heritage and trust that merit alone would suffice, while virtually all other groups continued to unashamedly advance their interests collectively.

The result was predictable. By disarming ourselves, we became the only group expected to deny shared identity, loyalties, and obligations. Everyone else continued to organise around their interests; we stood alone in self-imposed neutrality. The rules of the game didn’t change; only our willingness to play did.

Refusing to recognise our own identity didn’t fix the system; it just guaranteed our own disadvantage. Identity politics is not optional; it is universal. Every group practices in-group loyalty, every community defends its interests, every people invest in their continuity—except one. Ignoring this reality ensured our own inevitable decline.

Diagnosing the threat was not enough. Abandoning identity, in the belief that our own virtue and merit alone would suffice, exacerbated the problem and ultimately disqualified us from the game. Recognition of our shared identity, combined with biblically principled action for the well-being of our children, is not pride or supremacist—it is basic survival.

If we do not play the game as it is played by all others, the outcome is ethnic and cultural suicide. We’re seeing the fruits of it today, with marginalisation and decline across virtually every Western nation. Consequently, it should be evident to all that a civilisation that refuses to defend its own identity does not prove its virtue; it merely accelerates its own replacement.

Special Request:

For nearly eight years, we've highlighted issues ignored by mainstream media and resisted globalist ideologies eroding Western civilization. We've done this joyfully, without paywalls, despite personal costs to our team. Your support has kept us going, but operating costs exceed donations, forcing us to use ads. We’d love to ditch them, so we’re asking for your help. If you value our work, please consider supporting us via Stripe or PayPal. Every bit helps us keep fighting for our kids’ future. Thank you!

What's New?

Use the blue arrows at the bottom to scroll through the latest.
Hate Speech Laws Are Just Blasphemy Laws

Hate Speech Laws Are Just Blasphemy Laws

"Blasphemy laws protect a society’s sacred object from verbal violation. Hate speech laws do the same, only the sacred object has changed. They are secularism’s answer to blasphemy law: enforcing reverence for the system’s ultimate values while denying that those values are religious at all."
By
by Staff WriterJan 15, 2026
Opposition Grows to Labor’s “Horrendous” Hate Speech Bill: “Worst Assault on Freedom Yet”

Opposition Grows to Labor’s “Horrendous” Hate Speech Bill: “Worst Assault on Freedom Yet”

Opposition to the federal government’s Combating Antisemitism, Hate and Extremism Bill 2026 is mounting across multiple parties, with MPs and senators warning that the rushed, broadly worded legislation threatens free speech, religious freedom and civil liberties while failing to address the causes of extremism.
By
by Staff WriterJan 15, 2026
Democrats Want Trump’s War Powers Limited Over a War With Venezuela That Doesn’t Exist

Democrats Want Trump’s War Powers Limited Over a War With Venezuela That Doesn’t Exist

“This Vote greatly hampers American self-defence and National Security, impeding the President’s Authority as Commander in Chief,” Trump wrote.
By
by Rod LampardJan 14, 2026
True Leaders Inspire Unity, Weak Men Legislate It

True Leaders Inspire Unity, Weak Men Legislate It

"Heavy-handed laws, by contrast, are a symptom of weakness—a last resort when authority has decayed, and coercion is all that remains."
By
by Staff WriterJan 13, 2026
Australians Sound Alarm Over New Draconian “Hate” Bill

Australians Sound Alarm Over New Draconian “Hate” Bill

"The Parliamentary Joint Committee on Intelligence and Security has allowed less than 48 hours for public submissions on the 144-page draft bill."
By
by Staff WriterJan 13, 2026
Hate Speech Laws Are an Admission of Government Failure

Hate Speech Laws Are an Admission of Government Failure

"Hate speech laws are evidence that our governments can no longer inspire loyalty, trust, or solidarity. They are an admission that policymakers have no unifying vision capable of bringing diverse people together voluntarily. So instead, they use force."
By
by Ben DavisJan 13, 2026
UK Leads Talks With Canada and Australia on Potential X Ban

UK Leads Talks With Canada and Australia on Potential X Ban

"Free communication has always posed a problem for those who seek to centralise authority. Open platforms like X allow claims to be challenged, narratives to be contested, and power to be scrutinised. That is precisely why they become targets when governments feel uncomfortable, embarrassed, or threatened."
By
by Staff WriterJan 12, 2026
Self-Regulation or State Control: How Society’s Moral Collapse Hands Government Power

Self-Regulation or State Control: How Society’s Moral Collapse Hands Government Power

"Public degeneracy doesn’t just corrode society, it empowers the state. Once enough people normalise moral disorder, government intervention stops being the exception and becomes the rule."
By
by Staff WriterJan 10, 2026

Image

Support

If you value our work and would like to support us, you can do so by visiting our support page. Can’t find what you’re looking for? Visit our search page.

Copyright © 2025, Caldron Pool

Permissions

Everything published at Caldron Pool is protected by copyright and cannot be used and/or duplicated without prior written permission. Links and excerpts with full attribution are permitted. Published articles represent the opinions of the author and may not reflect the views of all contributors at Caldron Pool.

Caldron Pool does not condone the use of violence, threats, or intimidation for political or religious purposes. We strongly advocate for peaceful, respectful, and free communication and open debate without fear of reprisal or punishment.