Image

We Have No Right to Lecture Israelis or Palestinians

"Australia is not a global power. We should have no pretensions to be one. We certainly have no right to tell Israel what to do, or Palestinians how they should identify, or really any other nation how to conduct their internal affairs."

Last week Australia reversed its decision to recognize West Jerusalem as its capital, creating a hornet’s nest of comments in the media and social media. But what should we think about this?[1]

Firstly, Israel has every right to determine what its capital is. That is their right as a sovereign nation. Every nation, that is, every people, has the right to self-determination. They get to decide where their capital is, and how foreigners will interact with their domestic politicians. This is the right of the Israeli Knesset (parliament) alone which sets the laws of the modern nation of Israel.

We Australians have no right to tell them otherwise, we have no right to interfere in the domestic affairs of another nation, and we would take exception to any other nation doing the same thing to us. It is petty that we do try to tell the Israelis where they can place their capital.

Secondly, Palestinians also have every right to dispute the capital of Israel being Jerusalem. For many centuries Jerusalem was the capital of Palestine. While there is no doubt that the Palestinian people have been captured by violent anti-Israel political powers, the Palestinians themselves are a genuine people with ancient roots in the land of Palestine, which was a legitimate name of that land for much, though of course not all, of its history.

As a result, there are also many texts which refer to the country of Palestine, as they would any other country. All you have to do is pick up a history book and you will see this is true, especially an older one. For example, Schaff’s A History of the Christian Church, volume 5 first published in 1911, says this:

Other circumstances gave additional impulse to the movement, such as the hope of securing relics of which Palestine and Constantinople were the chief storehouses; and the opportunity of starting a profitable trade in silk, paper, spices, and other products of the East. These pilgrimages were not seriously interrupted by the Mohammedans after their conquest of Jerusalem by Omar in 637, until Syria and Palestine passed into the hands of the sultans of Egypt three centuries later. Under Hakim, 1010, a fierce persecution broke out against the Christian residents of Palestine and the pilgrims.[2]

No one would ever be taken seriously who said that Syria never existed, at least not by anyone credible. Yet here we have Syria and Palestine spoken of as real geographical places, alongside Constantinople, places where people lived and breathed and had valuable relics. In fact, Palestine is mentioned as being comparable to Constantinople in its storehouse of relics. And note this important point, Palestine is recorded as a land filled with Christian residents. This has been true of Judea/Palestine since the era of the early church.[3]

For obvious reasons, both Constantinople and Palestine have played a central role in many centuries of Christian history. Many people are aware that Palestine was a province of Rome, then the Eastern Roman Empire (Byzantium), and then the various Islamic Empires. But it is wrong to say this means it was never a nation as well. After all, both Syrians and Palestinians were in a similar circumstance for centuries, both countries have had massive influxes of people from the East and the West, and people of both places now tell us they are either Syrians or Palestinians. The most important principle of nationhood is a self-asserted identity that is commonly held by a people, and this designation, Palestinian, for people in this region can be traced back to the era of the ancient Greeks (though modern Palestinians are not Philistines).

In fact, even the famous Balfour Declaration, with which the British Empire ensured the Zionist Federation that the British Empire would “…use their best endeavours to facilitate the achievement of…” a “…home for the Jewish people…” noted that said home would be established in “Palestine”.[4] The condition of the British establishing such a home for the Jewish people is interesting though, because it was predicated on “it being clearly understood that nothing shall be done which may prejudice the civil and religious rights of existing non-Jewish communities in Palestine or the rights and political status enjoyed by Jews in any other country.”[5] What is another name for people in Palestine? Palestinians, except those visiting, of course.

Palestinians, therefore, have a legitimate historical claim on the land of their ancestors. There are people among the Palestinians who trace themselves back to the ancient Jerusalem Church, yes, the one founded by the Apostles.[6][7] There is no place on earth that can claim a more ancient lineage of continual Christian belief, which is remarkable considering how much opposition various ruling empires of that land have had towards Christianity.

Genetically there are people there that can be traced back to the most ancient inhabitants of the land,[8] and various genetic studies show how closely related Palestinians and modern Jews are.[9] Indeed, these studies show that Palestinians and Jews have a common ancestor, whom we know is Abraham. Abraham was told his offspring would always inhabit the land (Gen. 15:17-21; 17:1-8) and Paul tells us that all Christian believers are Abraham’s offspring (Gal. 3:7, 16, 29). Therefore, Palestinian Christians are physically and spiritually the ancestors of Abraham, and show that God’s promise was fulfilled that Abraham’s offspring would always inhabit the land.

They are also not just “Arabs”, as is often asserted, Arabs themselves have different nationalities, just like we Europeans do. Saying Palestinians are just Arabs would be like saying the English are just Germans. So, while we must agree that Israel has a right to assert where its capital is, we should also admit that the Palestinian people have a right to dispute this.

But even if you disagree with this argument, you still don’t have a right to determine that the Palestinians are not a people. You can assert it, but your assertion is meaningless. Nationality is a self-asserted right. It is petty that we try to deny it in this nation. Our connection, as Australians, to our land is far less ancient and yet you would not let anyone deny it, would you? 

It is between Israel and Palestine to sort out this issue. Israelis of course have deep historical claims to the land of Judea. Anyone who reads the Bible can see how the nation of Israel was formed in the promised land of Canaan, and how deeply entwined the identity of the Jewish people is with that land. No one can deny this either. It is so well known to Christians, I see no need to make a detailed case for this. But it is not for Australians to settle this conflict. It is deep, and profoundly complicated and has historical, theological and political implications far above any of our pay grades.

But also, in the Australian political context, who cares? It’s kind of ridiculous that a continual conflict in another country far away, where two competing ancient peoples can’t agree, has such an impact on Australian politics. Nothing Australia does will actually affect the situation for good or for bad in that disputed land. Issues of Israel, Palestine or most foreign countries (if any) should not have any serious bearing on Aussie politics. We show great hubris to think we can have a swaying opinion in this conflict. You can open up many pages of the Bible and see there is conflict happening in Gaza, and then you can open up many modern news sites and see the exact same thing. This conflict is beyond Australia’s ability or influence to solve.  

Australia is not a global power. We should have no pretensions to be one. We certainly have no right to tell Israel what to do, or Palestinians how they should identify, or really any other nation how to conduct their internal affairs. Israel must exist and must be given every chance to succeed. History has proven this. But, even if you dispute the historical claims of the Palestinians to be a nation, when their land was partitioned in 1948 a national identity was surely formed.

The Palestinians identify with that series of events, and if the rest of history isn’t enough for you, then without any doubt their collective experience as a people of being disenfranchised in their own land is as clear a national origin story as you’ll get. As the Palestinian Christian Kairos Statement says:

“We address ourselves to our brothers and sisters, members of our Churches in this land. We call out as Christians and as Palestinians to our religious and political leaders, to our Palestinian society and to the Israeli society, to the international community, and to our Christian brothers and sisters in the Churches around the world.”[10]

They know who they are, and they call themselves Palestinians. Some of them are our brothers and sisters in Christ, just as we have brothers and sisters in Christ amongst the Israelis. We really should not be seeking to interfere in the self-determination of these two peoples.

In fact, if you pay enough attention to immigration and demographic trends in Australia, it is obvious that we have our own issues of this kind building just over the horizon. That is what should concern us. May the God of peace prepare us to wisely handle that.


[1] Fox News, 2022, https://www.foxnews.com/world/australia-reverses-decision-recognize-jerusalem-israel-capital

[2] Philip Schaff 1988, History of the Christian Church, William B Eerdmans Publishing Company, Grand Rapids, Michigan, pp222-223.

[3] Encyclopedia, 2022, https://www.encyclopedia.com/religion/encyclopedias-almanacs-transcripts-and-maps/palestine-early-church

[4] Jewish Virtual Library, 2022, https://www.jewishvirtuallibrary.org/text-of-the-balfour-declaration

[5] Ibid.

[6] Encyclopedia, 2022, https://www.encyclopedia.com/religion/encyclopedias-almanacs-transcripts-and-maps/palestine-early-church

[7] Palestinian Portal, 2022, https://www.palestineportal.org/learn-teach/israelpalestine-the-basics/palestinian-christians/

[8] Arnaiz-Villena, A et. Al. 2001, https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/11543891/

[9] https://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2000/05/000509003653.htm

[10]  Kairos Palestine, accessed 21/07/2020, https://www.kairospalestine.ps/index.php/about-kairos/kairos-palestine-document.

Special Request:

For nearly eight years, we've highlighted issues ignored by mainstream media and resisted globalist ideologies eroding Western civilization. We've done this joyfully, without paywalls, despite personal costs to our team. Your support has kept us going, but operating costs exceed donations, forcing us to use ads. We’d love to ditch them, so we’re asking for your help. If you value our work, please consider supporting us via Stripe or PayPal. Every bit helps us keep fighting for our kids’ future. Thank you!

What's New?

Use the blue arrows at the bottom to scroll through the latest.
Actor Zachery Levi Credits God for Faith-Fuelled Escape Out of Hollywood Hell

Actor Zachery Levi Credits God for Faith-Fuelled Escape Out of Hollywood Hell

“Hollywood had never been a healthy place for me,” he wrote. “I don’t know if it’s a healthy place for anyone.”
By
by Rod LampardNov 8, 2025
100-Year-Old WWII Veteran Says the Sacrifice “Wasn’t Worth the Result”

100-Year-Old WWII Veteran Says the Sacrifice “Wasn’t Worth the Result”

"Hundreds of my friends, and everyone else who gave their lives. For what? The country of today? No, I’m sorry, the sacrifice wasn’t worth the result we have now," he said.
By
by Staff WriterNov 8, 2025
You Watched As Young White Men Were Vilified — Now You’re Shocked You Don’t Have Their Respect?

You Watched As Young White Men Were Vilified — Now You’re Shocked You Don’t Have Their Respect?

Before you condemn these young men, ask yourself whether you’re really condemning the consequences of your own creation.
By
by Ben DavisNov 7, 2025
Why Modern Multiculturalism Dismantles the Civilization That Made It Possible

Why Modern Multiculturalism Dismantles the Civilization That Made It Possible

"Multiculturalism today is less about culture and more about religious and moral relativism: the belief that there is no ultimate truth, no objective or unchanging moral law to which we, as individuals or as a society, must conform."
By
by Ben DavisNov 7, 2025
Turkey Labels Christianity a Threat to National Security 

Turkey Labels Christianity a Threat to National Security 

"Up to 350 Christians have been booted out of the country since 2020."
By
by Rod LampardNov 6, 2025
Why Christians Should Be Wary of Another U.S. Military ‘Solution’

Why Christians Should Be Wary of Another U.S. Military ‘Solution’

“For Christians, the deeper issue is not merely whether intervention ‘works’ by secular metrics. It is the worldly temptation to impose our will on other countries through carnal, imperial means… The modern record shows that these ventures reliably make life worse at home and abroad.”
By
by J.B. RichardsNov 5, 2025
Vatican Declares ‘Co-Redemptrix’ an Inappropriate Title for Mary

Vatican Declares ‘Co-Redemptrix’ an Inappropriate Title for Mary

“The expression ‘co-redemptrix’ does not help extol Mary as the first and foremost collaborator in the work of redemption and grace, for it carries the risk of eclipsing the exclusive role of Jesus Christ,” the document said.
By
by Staff WriterNov 5, 2025
Petition to Stop Mass Immigration to Australia Nears 200,000 Signatures

Petition to Stop Mass Immigration to Australia Nears 200,000 Signatures

"This is not the country I remember and it’s not one I want to leave to future generations."
By
by Staff WriterNov 5, 2025

Image

Support

If you value our work and would like to support us, you can do so by visiting our support page. Can’t find what you’re looking for? Visit our search page.

Copyright © 2025, Caldron Pool

Permissions

Everything published at Caldron Pool is protected by copyright and cannot be used and/or duplicated without prior written permission. Links and excerpts with full attribution are permitted. Published articles represent the opinions of the author and may not reflect the views of all contributors at Caldron Pool.

Caldron Pool does not condone the use of violence, threats, or intimidation for political or religious purposes. We strongly advocate for peaceful, respectful, and free communication and open debate without fear of reprisal or punishment.