Image

The Tyranny of ‘Tolerance’ Puts People in Chains

"We must resist the temptation to allow secular ideologies to redefine Biblical virtues and truths."

Tolerance used to be defined as the ability to respectfully engage with others, even if you disagree with what they say. Nevertheless, it is clear that the new ‘tolerance’ is far less about encouraging deferential dialogue, and far more to do with controlling speech.

We witness this shift in the authoritarian regimes around us. Specifically, we see the idolatry and weaponization of the notion of ‘tolerance.’ The failure to celebrate the doctrines of secularism is deemed as intolerance, and those who dare to question the status quo are increasingly being dismissed as bigots.

Indeed, Don Carson predicted the iconoclasm we are witnessing first-hand: “Unchecked, the new tolerance will sooner or later put many people in chains.”

As an exclusive message of salvation, the gospel and teachings of Jesus Christ have been the bullseye of public criticism in this battle for tolerance.

One such instance concerns the legal situation in which the Stirling Free Church of Scotland (SFCS) has found itself in relation to The Robertson Trust.

As the largest independent charity organisation in Scotland, The Robertson Trust awards around £20m each year to various causes. It also leases numerous venues for community groups and organisations.

Under the leadership of Shonai Macpherson, The Robertson Trust (TRT) has faced increasing criticism for its alleged discrimination against Christian groups.

For instance, TRT recently terminated a rental agreement with the SFCS over their Biblical stance on marriage.

Simon Calvert of The Christian Institute explains:

“The Robertson Trust pride themselves on serving the community. But religious groups that want to promote their beliefs are at the heart of the community. So why are they being treated differently? It seems pretty clear from the evidence that there is some hostility within the trust to Christian beliefs about marriage.”

Assisted by The Christian Institute, both organisations took TRT to court over charges of religious discrimination in violation of the Equality Act 2010.

As The Christian Institute stated: “It is unlawful for providers of venue facilities to discriminate against people because of their religious beliefs.”

The Equality Act 2010 stipulates that discrimination on the basis of one’s religious beliefs is prosecutable by law. If successful in their case, SFCS will sue TRF for unlawfully terminating their contract on the basis of religious discrimination.

A similar situation arose in 2019 when eight British arenas cancelled Franklin Graham’s events, and his advertisements were pulled from Blackpool Transport buses due to his opposition to so-called gay marriage. Franklin pursued legal action against the bussing company for religious discrimination and came out winning the case.

As Christians living in the West, we find ourselves in an increasingly hostile and antagonistic environment in which our beliefs are being labelled as hate speech. This is not surprising, as it follows the progression of sin in Romans 1:18-32.

And what is the process?

  1. Suppression of the truth (Rom. 1:18).
  2. Refusal to give thanks to God for His goodness (Rom. 1:21).
  3. Worship of idols and immorality of various kinds (Rom. 1:23-24).
  4. Outward celebration of sin, and intolerance of those who do not (Rom. 1:32).

This said, the seduction is strong for Christians to be blindsided by secular jargon which sounds ‘Christian’ — it’s tempting to think that secularism’s tolerance, diversity, equity, and justice match the Biblical definitions, though this is far from the truth. Yet the Scriptures remind us that the devil masquerades as an angel of light, and so this shouldn’t surprise us (2 Corinthians 11:14).

Biblically speaking, we know that terms can only be truly understood through the lens of God’s Word. We must resist the temptation to allow secular ideologies to redefine Biblical virtues and truths (2 Corinthians 10:5).

Finally, if we hope to reach dying souls in our midst, we must realise that our battle is not against flesh and blood (Ephesians 6:12). Rather, our warfare is against spiritual strongholds which have set themselves up against Christ in the form of ideological campaigns masquerading under Christian principles.

Only when we recognise this will we be able to point people to the one who gives true justice, tolerance, mercy, and grace — Jesus Christ.

Special Request:

For nearly eight years, we've highlighted issues ignored by mainstream media and resisted globalist ideologies eroding Western civilization. We've done this joyfully, without paywalls, despite personal costs to our team. Your support has kept us going, but operating costs exceed donations, forcing us to use ads. We’d love to ditch them, so we’re asking for your help. If you value our work, please consider supporting us via Stripe or PayPal. Every bit helps us keep fighting for our kids’ future. Thank you!

What's New?

Use the blue arrows at the bottom to scroll through the latest.
Florida Designates the Muslim Brotherhood a Foreign Terrorist Organisation

Florida Designates the Muslim Brotherhood a Foreign Terrorist Organisation

“The order rightly calls out the Muslim Brotherhood’s subterfuge and ideology as ‘irreconcilable with foundational American principles of life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness.’”
By
by Rod LampardDec 18, 2025
Theology Has Public Consequences

Theology Has Public Consequences

"Theology does not remain private; it works itself out in culture, institutions, and public life."
By
by Staff WriterDec 17, 2025
Deeming Backs Smith After Pronoun Police Penalty: Refusing to Affirm a Lie Isn’t Dishonesty – It’s Courage!

Deeming Backs Smith After Pronoun Police Penalty: Refusing to Affirm a Lie Isn’t Dishonesty – It’s Courage!

“By supporting Kirralie, you’re really supporting every single Australian who wants to speak up in the future. This is especially so for women, because when one woman is punished for this, thousands of women are made silent.”
By
by Rod LampardDec 17, 2025
We Don’t Need Antisemitism Laws—We Need Anti-Australia Laws

We Don’t Need Antisemitism Laws—We Need Anti-Australia Laws

Australia does not need race-based antisemitism laws; it needs a pro-Australian legal framework that applies equally to all and punishes harmful conduct regardless of who commits it or who the victim is.
By
by Ben DavisDec 17, 2025
From “You Do You” to Leadership Coups: The Deadly Fruit of Post-Modernists in the Pulpit

From “You Do You” to Leadership Coups: The Deadly Fruit of Post-Modernists in the Pulpit

“Anyone who says that there are no truths, or that all truth is ‘merely relative,’ is asking you not to believe him. So don’t!”
By
by Rod LampardDec 16, 2025
Matt Walsh Slams Australian Government After Bondi Shooting

Matt Walsh Slams Australian Government After Bondi Shooting

"Rules are not enough. You also need to ensure that your country is full of people who are willing to follow those rules. And in that very important respect, Australia has clearly failed."
By
by Staff WriterDec 16, 2025
A Government Too Afraid to Name the Problem Can Never Fix It

A Government Too Afraid to Name the Problem Can Never Fix It

"Governments have become not only incapable but increasingly unwilling to acknowledge the simple and self-evident truth that some ideas are bad, and bad ideas inevitably produce bad behaviour."
By
by Ben DavisDec 16, 2025
16-Year-Old Explains Why the Social Media Ban Won’t Work

16-Year-Old Explains Why the Social Media Ban Won’t Work

"There are three very prominent concerns when it comes to how this law will actually work and the repercussions it could have."
By
by Selah CampisiDec 15, 2025

Image

Support

If you value our work and would like to support us, you can do so by visiting our support page. Can’t find what you’re looking for? Visit our search page.

Copyright © 2025, Caldron Pool

Permissions

Everything published at Caldron Pool is protected by copyright and cannot be used and/or duplicated without prior written permission. Links and excerpts with full attribution are permitted. Published articles represent the opinions of the author and may not reflect the views of all contributors at Caldron Pool.

Caldron Pool does not condone the use of violence, threats, or intimidation for political or religious purposes. We strongly advocate for peaceful, respectful, and free communication and open debate without fear of reprisal or punishment.