Image

‘The Book Burning Is Underway’: Stefan Molyneux BANNED from Youtube

Stefan Molyneux has had 14-years of work deleted after YouTube decided to ban the Canada-based philosopher from the video-sharing platform. Molyneux’s YouTube channel contained thousands of videos, attracted over 250-million views, and had close to 1-million subscribers before it was completely removed for allegedly inciting violence and hatred. Follow Caldron Pool on Facebook, Twitter, and Parler! In Molyneux’s words, “YouTube just suspended the largest philosophy conversation the world has ever known.” In a video posted to Twitter, the Free Domain host said: “The accusation is the usual one, that I’m fomenting violence and hatred, and so on – which is not true at……

Stefan Molyneux has had 14-years of work deleted after YouTube decided to ban the Canada-based philosopher from the video-sharing platform.

Molyneux’s YouTube channel contained thousands of videos, attracted over 250-million views, and had close to 1-million subscribers before it was completely removed for allegedly inciting violence and hatred.

Follow Caldron Pool on FacebookTwitter, and Parler!

In Molyneux’s words, “YouTube just suspended the largest philosophy conversation the world has ever known.”

In a video posted to Twitter, the Free Domain host said: “The accusation is the usual one, that I’m fomenting violence and hatred, and so on – which is not true at all.”

“I have consistently promulgated the non-aggression principle and called for reason and evidence as the methodology by which we can resolve social disputes and differences.

Molyneux continued: “Doesn’t seem to have mattered, of course. The reality is that the book-burning is underway. Myself and many other dissidents and anti-Communist intellectuals and speakers have also had channels destroyed across a wide variety of platforms within the span of only one hour, in what I assume is a highly coordinated effort to silence us.”

Twitch, Reddit, and Twitter also reportedly joined in the major combined purge on unapproved thought. Reddit alone on Monday banned over two thousand subreddits, including r/The_Donald and r/TheNewRight in an effort to stop the “promotion of hate”.

But if tech giants were really concerned about “hate” then we should expect to see a similar crackdown on left-wing incitement. The fact is, we rarely do.

Once again, this is simply an attempt to silence unapproved opinion. Of course, “hate speech” and similar terms are merely employed to create an illusion of virtue in censoring dissenting ideas.

Branding criticism or critique of particular ideologies or certain policies as “hate” and “incitement” provides the Left with a means of silencing an opponent without having to meaningfully engage with their arguments.

Molyneux went on to say, “The goal, of course, is to remove the middle. To remove those of us who are looking for peaceful solutions, rational solutions, philosophical solutions to social differences.

“To take us out so that there is no center to society and everyone can gravitate to the extremes, wherein the tinderbox of violence can be lit in a revolutionary conflagration of brutality. I’m going to strongly urge you, my friends, to resist that temptation. Resist that temptation to go to the extremes, to go to hostility, to go to rage, to go to violence,” he said.

Stefan Molyneux can be found at Freedomain.com

Special Request:

For nearly eight years, we've highlighted issues ignored by mainstream media and resisted globalist ideologies eroding Western civilization. We've done this joyfully, without paywalls, despite personal costs to our team. Your support has kept us going, but operating costs exceed donations, forcing us to use ads. We’d love to ditch them, so we’re asking for your help. If you value our work, please consider supporting us via Stripe or PayPal. Every bit helps us keep fighting for our kids’ future. Thank you!

What's New?

Use the blue arrows at the bottom to scroll through the latest.
Hate Speech Laws Are Just Blasphemy Laws

Hate Speech Laws Are Just Blasphemy Laws

"Blasphemy laws protect a society’s sacred object from verbal violation. Hate speech laws do the same, only the sacred object has changed. They are secularism’s answer to blasphemy law: enforcing reverence for the system’s ultimate values while denying that those values are religious at all."
By
by Staff WriterJan 15, 2026
Opposition Grows to Labor’s “Horrendous” Hate Speech Bill: “Worst Assault on Freedom Yet”

Opposition Grows to Labor’s “Horrendous” Hate Speech Bill: “Worst Assault on Freedom Yet”

Opposition to the federal government’s Combating Antisemitism, Hate and Extremism Bill 2026 is mounting across multiple parties, with MPs and senators warning that the rushed, broadly worded legislation threatens free speech, religious freedom and civil liberties while failing to address the causes of extremism.
By
by Staff WriterJan 15, 2026
Democrats Want Trump’s War Powers Limited Over a War With Venezuela That Doesn’t Exist

Democrats Want Trump’s War Powers Limited Over a War With Venezuela That Doesn’t Exist

“This Vote greatly hampers American self-defence and National Security, impeding the President’s Authority as Commander in Chief,” Trump wrote.
By
by Rod LampardJan 14, 2026
True Leaders Inspire Unity, Weak Men Legislate It

True Leaders Inspire Unity, Weak Men Legislate It

"Heavy-handed laws, by contrast, are a symptom of weakness—a last resort when authority has decayed, and coercion is all that remains."
By
by Staff WriterJan 13, 2026
Australians Sound Alarm Over New Draconian “Hate” Bill

Australians Sound Alarm Over New Draconian “Hate” Bill

"The Parliamentary Joint Committee on Intelligence and Security has allowed less than 48 hours for public submissions on the 144-page draft bill."
By
by Staff WriterJan 13, 2026
Hate Speech Laws Are an Admission of Government Failure

Hate Speech Laws Are an Admission of Government Failure

"Hate speech laws are evidence that our governments can no longer inspire loyalty, trust, or solidarity. They are an admission that policymakers have no unifying vision capable of bringing diverse people together voluntarily. So instead, they use force."
By
by Ben DavisJan 13, 2026
UK Leads Talks With Canada and Australia on Potential X Ban

UK Leads Talks With Canada and Australia on Potential X Ban

"Free communication has always posed a problem for those who seek to centralise authority. Open platforms like X allow claims to be challenged, narratives to be contested, and power to be scrutinised. That is precisely why they become targets when governments feel uncomfortable, embarrassed, or threatened."
By
by Staff WriterJan 12, 2026
Self-Regulation or State Control: How Society’s Moral Collapse Hands Government Power

Self-Regulation or State Control: How Society’s Moral Collapse Hands Government Power

"Public degeneracy doesn’t just corrode society, it empowers the state. Once enough people normalise moral disorder, government intervention stops being the exception and becomes the rule."
By
by Staff WriterJan 10, 2026

Image

Support

If you value our work and would like to support us, you can do so by visiting our support page. Can’t find what you’re looking for? Visit our search page.

Copyright © 2025, Caldron Pool

Permissions

Everything published at Caldron Pool is protected by copyright and cannot be used and/or duplicated without prior written permission. Links and excerpts with full attribution are permitted. Published articles represent the opinions of the author and may not reflect the views of all contributors at Caldron Pool.

Caldron Pool does not condone the use of violence, threats, or intimidation for political or religious purposes. We strongly advocate for peaceful, respectful, and free communication and open debate without fear of reprisal or punishment.