Image

Taxed to Death, Then Taxed in Death

"An 'inheritance tax' punishes foresight, penalises responsibility, and undermines a family's efforts to ensure future generations are free of financial enslavement to the state."

There’s been a fair bit of talk lately about imposing an inheritance tax—a so-called “death tax.” Advocates present it under the guise of fairness and equality, but nothing could be further from the truth.

At its core, such a proposal is rooted in envy. It is the legalisation of theft, dressed up in the language of compassion. The message behind it is simple: “If I cannot have it, no one can.” It prefers equal misery over unequal prosperity.

Of course, not all wealth is virtuous, and not all poverty is sinful. The Bible itself recognises that some wealth is ill-gotten. Yet there is also a general principle: when people live within the bounds of God’s law—working diligently, stewarding wisely—there is blessing. The attempt to strip families of the fruit of such labour is an assault not merely on economics but on the moral order itself.

The government has a simple role: punish wrongdoing, reward what is good. In practice, this means discouraging destructive behaviour while encouraging productivity and virtue.

But when government punishes the very things that build society—hard work, creativity, enterprise—what is the result? Less work, less creativity, less enterprise. Why go the extra mile, work the extra hour, or take the risk to create, if the state stands ready to confiscate every gain? Such policies destroy incentive and, with it, the drive to build, save, and provide for future generations.

It’s no accident that these ideas are most loudly championed by the least productive members of society—politicians, pundits, and bureaucrats. They do not build, invent, or create; they survive by leeching off the productivity of others. The politician, in particular, is the supreme example of this: he produces nothing, only confiscates, redistributes what others have produced, and then congratulates himself for his remarkable display of generosity and altruism. Such people are the last we should trust to decide how our hard-earned wealth is earned, kept, or spent.

But to the politician, especially one who favours “Big Government,” nothing is more detestable than genuinely productive, independent people. The reason is simple: the more productive the people, the less reliant they are on the state.

The Bible tells us, “A good man leaves an inheritance to his children’s children…” (Prov. 13:22). Yet, an “inheritance tax” is a direct assault on that effort. While it promises equal wealth, it can only deliver equal poverty, and thus, equal dependence on the government.

An “inheritance tax” punishes foresight, penalises responsibility, and undermines a family’s efforts to ensure future generations are free of financial enslavement to the state.

That’s why it is always in Big Government’s interest to keep as many people down as possible. The government’s power is in proportion to the people’s dependence on it. Hence, they’ll forever be in search of a pretext for confiscating more of your hard-earned income.

Excessive taxation doesn’t bring justice or fairness. It breeds resentment, rewards envy, and destroys the very conditions under which human flourishing is possible. It won’t just kill wealth, it’ll kill everything necessary to create and maintain a functioning society.

We’ve said it before, there should be a seriously low cap on how much money a government can legally take from the public before being forced to concede they’re simply not able to do the job they’ve been tasked with. Excessive taxations exist to fund the campaign promises and fix the mistakes of inept and incompetent politicians, their bloated governments, and bureaucrat mates.

In Australia, one in five workers is a government-employed, “public servant.” As such, the burden of electing an already bloated and ineffective government invariably falls on the hardworking populace, seldom on the incompetent politicians themselves. Thomas Sowell aptly said, “It is hard to imagine a more stupid or more dangerous way of making decisions than by putting those decisions in the hands of people who pay no price for being wrong.” And that, we’ve done.

In the end, to be taxed to death, and then taxed in death, is not just an attack on family wealth, but on work, responsibility, and freedom itself—and when governments punish those virtues, they do not build nations, they bankrupt them.

Special Request:

For nearly eight years, we've highlighted issues ignored by mainstream media and resisted globalist ideologies eroding Western civilization. We've done this joyfully, without paywalls, despite personal costs to our team. Your support has kept us going, but operating costs exceed donations, forcing us to use ads. We’d love to ditch them, so we’re asking for your help. If you value our work, please consider supporting us via Stripe or PayPal. Every bit helps us keep fighting for our kids’ future. Thank you!

What's New?

Use the blue arrows at the bottom to scroll through the latest.
Why Voters Are Abandoning the Liberals for One Nation

Why Voters Are Abandoning the Liberals for One Nation

“Australians aren't looking for a softer political version of what they're already suffering under. They are looking for an alternative.”
By
by Staff WriterJan 30, 2026
First the Imams, Then the Pastors

First the Imams, Then the Pastors

"Without formally recognising Christianity, accrediting imams today easily becomes accrediting pastors tomorrow. From there, it is a small step to state-sanctioned sermons, state-issued Bibles, state-regulated songs, and state-approved prayers."
By
by Staff WriterJan 29, 2026
The Evangelical Retreat: How Protestant Piety Became Cowardice

The Evangelical Retreat: How Protestant Piety Became Cowardice

"This is the spiritual problem of our age: We have a church that fears crucifixion more than compromise."
By
by Staff WriterJan 28, 2026
Littleproud Speech Goes Viral After Claiming ‘Radical Islam Is the Problem, Not Guns’

Littleproud Speech Goes Viral After Claiming ‘Radical Islam Is the Problem, Not Guns’

"All you are doing is diverting attention and taking away the rights of lawful Australians," he said.
By
by Staff WriterJan 27, 2026
Trump Shares Speech Claiming ‘Great Replacement’ Is A Reality

Trump Shares Speech Claiming ‘Great Replacement’ Is A Reality

"The video has rapidly gone viral, accumulating more than 30 million views across social media within 24 hours."
By
by Staff WriterJan 26, 2026
26 January 1788: The Day Australia Was Born

26 January 1788: The Day Australia Was Born

"Of all the peoples who could have established Australia, the Indigenous population was fortunate to have the Christian British settlers, who were among the most reserved, restrained, and compassionate when it came to dealing with the Natives."
By
by Staff WriterJan 26, 2026
Spain’s Socialist Government Calls for an EU Standing Army to Save Greenland From Trump

Spain’s Socialist Government Calls for an EU Standing Army to Save Greenland From Trump

“If we are facing a possible unilateral annexation of Greenland that would legitimise the Russian invasion of Ukraine, and the demise of NATO. Europe must act quickly,” he said.
By
by Rod LampardJan 24, 2026
Lutnick: “Globalisation Has Failed the West”

Lutnick: “Globalisation Has Failed the West”

"Under the 'America First' model, he argued, nations should prioritise their own workers, industries, and security while still engaging with trusted allies."
By
by Staff WriterJan 23, 2026

Image

Support

If you value our work and would like to support us, you can do so by visiting our support page. Can’t find what you’re looking for? Visit our search page.

Copyright © 2025, Caldron Pool

Permissions

Everything published at Caldron Pool is protected by copyright and cannot be used and/or duplicated without prior written permission. Links and excerpts with full attribution are permitted. Published articles represent the opinions of the author and may not reflect the views of all contributors at Caldron Pool.

Caldron Pool does not condone the use of violence, threats, or intimidation for political or religious purposes. We strongly advocate for peaceful, respectful, and free communication and open debate without fear of reprisal or punishment.