Image

Schools phase-out awards, students anxious about not winning

There can be no losers if there are no winners. That seems to be the philosophy some schools are now adopting, by phasing out the practice of rewarding high achieving students who excel above their peers. Students from St James’ Parish School in Victoria will now be required to compete against themselves and the personal achievements they set the prior year. According to ABC News, “Children celebrate not with a shiny piece of satin to pin on their shirts, but with the warm inner glow that comes from achieving a personal best (PB), and working together to beat the total……

There can be no losers if there are no winners. That seems to be the philosophy some schools are now adopting, by phasing out the practice of rewarding high achieving students who excel above their peers.

Students from St James’ Parish School in Victoria will now be required to compete against themselves and the personal achievements they set the prior year.

According to ABC News, “Children celebrate not with a shiny piece of satin to pin on their shirts, but with the warm inner glow that comes from achieving a personal best (PB), and working together to beat the total number of PB’s set the previous year.”

Students at the school reportedly said they’re grateful for the change, as they’re no longer feeling a sense of anxiety about not coming first.

Co-principal Peter Fahey told the ABC: “In the past children competed but it was at the expense of another child. Now they all gather around and cheer each other.”

Mr Fahey went on to explain that our children and society have become praise-dependent.

“The diet of constant reinforcement and praise — where children are told they can do anything, they are bubble-wrapped, cotton-wooled and pampered in an attempt to raise their self-esteem — is having dire consequences,” he said.

Last year, Westmead Public School started to phase out the award-system after coming to the belief that “rewards were making students anxious and competitive and undermining their sense of fairness.”

The school’s official Twitter account sent out a number of tweets explaining the decision:

“We deeply engage in research about student motivation and are adapting to meet the needs of our kids to ensure everyone is known, valued and cared for. We do not claim to be ‘award free’ but we do aim to be intrinsically focused and strategic in what awards exist and why.

“As part of our process we removed our incremental awards system and shifted focus to providing students with feedback and providing students with opportunities to understand and develop the character strengths they will require in their future lives. We focus on student growth,” the school said.

One Nation MP Mark Latham responded by saying: “One of the largest primary schools in NSW, Westmead Public, has abolished end-of-year awards K-2 and achievement certificates across the school.

“Instead of ‘All Must Have Prizes’ they have gone to ‘None Must Have Prizes’, a Soviet variation and betrayal of high achieving students.

“There has been a steady decline in Westmead’s combined 3/5 NAPLAN results since 2012, especially in Writing. Sadly, it’s not ‘student growth’ but regression. The Golden Rule applies: ‘progressive’ ideological learning programs = weaker results for the children.”

What do you think? Should schools phase our the current reward-system or does it teach kids valuable life lessons?

Special Request:

For nearly eight years, we've highlighted issues ignored by mainstream media and resisted globalist ideologies eroding Western civilization. We've done this joyfully, without paywalls, despite personal costs to our team. Your support has kept us going, but operating costs exceed donations, forcing us to use ads. We’d love to ditch them, so we’re asking for your help. If you value our work, please consider supporting us via Stripe or PayPal. Every bit helps us keep fighting for our kids’ future. Thank you!

What's New?

Use the blue arrows at the bottom to scroll through the latest.
16-Year-Old Explains Why the Social Media Ban Won’t Work

16-Year-Old Explains Why the Social Media Ban Won’t Work

"There are three very prominent concerns when it comes to how this law will actually work and the repercussions it could have."
By
by Selah CampisiDec 15, 2025
Bondi Massacre: A Wake-Up Call for Australia

Bondi Massacre: A Wake-Up Call for Australia

"Without honest discourse, decisive policy, and recognition that not all cultures can coexist harmoniously, such attacks are likely to recur—just look at Europe today."
By
by Staff WriterDec 15, 2025
White Guilt is Dead

White Guilt is Dead

"For decades, White guilt has been used as a tool of social control—silencing dissent, suppressing legitimate demographic concerns, and guilt-tripping Westerners into accepting policies that no other civilisation on earth would tolerate."
By
by Staff WriterDec 13, 2025
Brave New Families: How State Power Is Replacing Parental Responsibility

Brave New Families: How State Power Is Replacing Parental Responsibility

“All I see is the dystopian Brave New future that are projections of our simplistic mechanistic leaders, which makes sense, given their godfather is Karl Marx, a determinist who has bred many of his kind after his image.”
By
by Dr Stephen FysonDec 12, 2025
When the State Becomes Co-Parent: Australia’s Intrusion into Family Life

When the State Becomes Co-Parent: Australia’s Intrusion into Family Life

"As the state once absorbed the moral and spiritual leadership of the Church over society, so too can it absorb the moral and spiritual authority of parents over their children."
By
by Staff WriterDec 11, 2025
Tarantino Ranks ‘The Passion of the Christ’ Among the Best Films of the Century

Tarantino Ranks ‘The Passion of the Christ’ Among the Best Films of the Century

“I think it actually is one of the most brilliant visual storytelling films ever made,” he said.
By
by Rod LampardDec 11, 2025
Truth Tax: Senate Dissenters Reject Albo’s FOI Amendments as a “Hubris-Driven Attack on Transparency”

Truth Tax: Senate Dissenters Reject Albo’s FOI Amendments as a “Hubris-Driven Attack on Transparency”

"The consensus from dissenters seems to be that this bill further distances the Australian government from the people its representatives are elected to serve."
By
by Rod LampardDec 10, 2025
Speech Rejected, Promiscuity Approved

Speech Rejected, Promiscuity Approved

"The question arises, while Candace Owens' verbalising conservative values is not in our nation's interest, Lily Philips' sleeping around with Australian men is?"
By
by Selah CampisiDec 9, 2025

Image

Support

If you value our work and would like to support us, you can do so by visiting our support page. Can’t find what you’re looking for? Visit our search page.

Copyright © 2025, Caldron Pool

Permissions

Everything published at Caldron Pool is protected by copyright and cannot be used and/or duplicated without prior written permission. Links and excerpts with full attribution are permitted. Published articles represent the opinions of the author and may not reflect the views of all contributors at Caldron Pool.

Caldron Pool does not condone the use of violence, threats, or intimidation for political or religious purposes. We strongly advocate for peaceful, respectful, and free communication and open debate without fear of reprisal or punishment.