Image

Redefining marriage for 0.2% of the population

In Australia, marriage is currently defined as “the union of a man and a woman to the exclusion of all others, voluntarily entered into for life.” Proponents of Same-Sex Marriage want this definition changed, so that marriage will no longer be exclusively limited to “the union of a man and a woman.” The redefining of marriage will allow for couples of the same gender to marry each other. Given the attention this subject has been granted of late, you’d be forgiven for thinking that same-sex couples made up a large percentage of the population. But in reality, that’s just not……

In Australia, marriage is currently defined as “the union of a man and a woman to the exclusion of all others, voluntarily entered into for life.”

Proponents of Same-Sex Marriage want this definition changed, so that marriage will no longer be exclusively limited to “the union of a man and a woman.” The redefining of marriage will allow for couples of the same gender to marry each other.

Given the attention this subject has been granted of late, you’d be forgiven for thinking that same-sex couples made up a large percentage of the population. But in reality, that’s just not the case.

According to the 2016 census, 46,800 same-sex couples were counted across Australia, making up just under 0.4% of the population.

When the University of Queensland surveyed LGBTI Australians, the results indicated that only 54% of same-sex couples would actually get married if the definition changed. This would suggest that Australians are being asked to redefine marriage for 0.2% of the population.

The same census revealed Muslims currently make up 2.6% of the population. And under Islamic marital jurisprudence, Muslim men are allowed to have more than one wife at the same time. So, the question is, once we remove “the union of a man and a woman” from the Marriage Act for 0.2% of the population, what reason do we have for denying 2.6% if they were ever to demand the removal of “to the exclusion of all others?”

Special Request:

For nearly eight years, we've highlighted issues ignored by mainstream media and resisted globalist ideologies eroding Western civilization. We've done this joyfully, without paywalls, despite personal costs to our team. Your support has kept us going, but operating costs exceed donations, forcing us to use ads. We’d love to ditch them, so we’re asking for your help. If you value our work, please consider supporting us via Stripe or PayPal. Every bit helps us keep fighting for our kids’ future. Thank you!

What's New?

Use the blue arrows at the bottom to scroll through the latest.
A Government Too Afraid to Name the Problem Can Never Fix It

A Government Too Afraid to Name the Problem Can Never Fix It

"Governments have become not only incapable but increasingly unwilling to acknowledge the simple and self-evident truth that some ideas are bad, and bad ideas inevitably produce bad behaviour."
By
by Ben DavisDec 16, 2025
16-Year-Old Explains Why the Social Media Ban Won’t Work

16-Year-Old Explains Why the Social Media Ban Won’t Work

"There are three very prominent concerns when it comes to how this law will actually work and the repercussions it could have."
By
by Selah CampisiDec 15, 2025
Bondi Massacre: A Wake-Up Call for Australia

Bondi Massacre: A Wake-Up Call for Australia

"Without honest discourse, decisive policy, and recognition that not all cultures can coexist harmoniously, such attacks are likely to recur—just look at Europe today."
By
by Staff WriterDec 15, 2025
White Guilt is Dead

White Guilt is Dead

"For decades, White guilt has been used as a tool of social control—silencing dissent, suppressing legitimate demographic concerns, and guilt-tripping Westerners into accepting policies that no other civilisation on earth would tolerate."
By
by Staff WriterDec 13, 2025
Brave New Families: How State Power Is Replacing Parental Responsibility

Brave New Families: How State Power Is Replacing Parental Responsibility

“All I see is the dystopian Brave New future that are projections of our simplistic mechanistic leaders, which makes sense, given their godfather is Karl Marx, a determinist who has bred many of his kind after his image.”
By
by Dr Stephen FysonDec 12, 2025
When the State Becomes Co-Parent: Australia’s Intrusion into Family Life

When the State Becomes Co-Parent: Australia’s Intrusion into Family Life

"As the state once absorbed the moral and spiritual leadership of the Church over society, so too can it absorb the moral and spiritual authority of parents over their children."
By
by Staff WriterDec 11, 2025
Tarantino Ranks ‘The Passion of the Christ’ Among the Best Films of the Century

Tarantino Ranks ‘The Passion of the Christ’ Among the Best Films of the Century

“I think it actually is one of the most brilliant visual storytelling films ever made,” he said.
By
by Rod LampardDec 11, 2025
Truth Tax: Senate Dissenters Reject Albo’s FOI Amendments as a “Hubris-Driven Attack on Transparency”

Truth Tax: Senate Dissenters Reject Albo’s FOI Amendments as a “Hubris-Driven Attack on Transparency”

"The consensus from dissenters seems to be that this bill further distances the Australian government from the people its representatives are elected to serve."
By
by Rod LampardDec 10, 2025

Image

Support

If you value our work and would like to support us, you can do so by visiting our support page. Can’t find what you’re looking for? Visit our search page.

Copyright © 2025, Caldron Pool

Permissions

Everything published at Caldron Pool is protected by copyright and cannot be used and/or duplicated without prior written permission. Links and excerpts with full attribution are permitted. Published articles represent the opinions of the author and may not reflect the views of all contributors at Caldron Pool.

Caldron Pool does not condone the use of violence, threats, or intimidation for political or religious purposes. We strongly advocate for peaceful, respectful, and free communication and open debate without fear of reprisal or punishment.