Image

Labor and Greens Block Inquiry Into eSafety Commissioner’s Powers

"No one voted for this Commissioner. Yet she can now demand ID to log in to Google, suppress content she doesn’t like, and do so without sufficient Parliamentary oversight. That should alarm every Australian," Senator Babet said.

Labor and the Greens have blocked a motion to launch an inquiry into the expansive powers held by the eSafety Commissioner, Julie Inman Grant.

The motion, brought forward by Senators Malcolm Roberts and Ralph Babet, aimed to refer the Internet Search Engine Services Online Safety Code to the Environment and Communications References Committee for further investigation. The inquiry sought to examine the Code’s implications for Australians’ privacy, civil liberties, and potential for government overreach in the digital space.

The Senate voted down the motion with a result of 34-27, with members of the government, the Greens, and the crossbench all rejecting the call for an inquiry. In doing so, they blocked any further scrutiny of the eSafety Commissioner’s authority and the controversial measures set to be implemented later this year.

The proposed Online Safety Code would require users of search engines like Google and Bing to undergo invasive age verification measures, including the possible submission of government-issued IDs, biometric data, and facial recognition scans. Critics argue that these requirements could lead to significant violations of privacy and civil liberties.

Senator Ralph Babet condemned the Greens for siding with the Labor government to block the inquiry, stating: “If this motion had passed, Big Tech and the eSafety Commissioner would have been forced to explain themselves in full view of the public.”

Babet continued: “Instead, Labor and the Greens have voted to shield them from scrutiny. No one voted for this Commissioner. Yet she can now demand ID to log in to Google, suppress content she doesn’t like, and do so without sufficient Parliamentary oversight. That should alarm every Australian.”

The senator further warned that this move is part of a broader shift towards a digital surveillance state, under the pretense of protecting children online. He pointed to the UK as an example, where similar measures have resulted in the suppression of journalism, censorship of dissenting opinions, and a stifling of public discourse.

“That’s the direction Labor and the Greens are steering Australia towards,” he warned.

The decision to block the inquiry comes amid growing concerns over digital privacy and the unchecked power of regulatory bodies like the eSafety Commissioner. The Online Safety Code is set to be enforced later this year, despite ongoing criticism from free speech and privacy advocates.

Special Request:

For nearly eight years, we've highlighted issues ignored by mainstream media and resisted globalist ideologies eroding Western civilization. We've done this joyfully, without paywalls, despite personal costs to our team. Your support has kept us going, but operating costs exceed donations, forcing us to use ads. We’d love to ditch them, so we’re asking for your help. If you value our work, please consider supporting us via Stripe or PayPal. Every bit helps us keep fighting for our kids’ future. Thank you!

What's New?

Use the blue arrows at the bottom to scroll through the latest.
Bondi Massacre: A Wake-Up Call for Australia

Bondi Massacre: A Wake-Up Call for Australia

"Without honest discourse, decisive policy, and recognition that not all cultures can coexist harmoniously, such attacks are likely to recur—just look at Europe today."
By
by Staff WriterDec 15, 2025
White Guilt is Dead

White Guilt is Dead

"For decades, White guilt has been used as a tool of social control—silencing dissent, suppressing legitimate demographic concerns, and guilt-tripping Westerners into accepting policies that no other civilisation on earth would tolerate."
By
by Staff WriterDec 13, 2025
Brave New Families: How State Power Is Replacing Parental Responsibility

Brave New Families: How State Power Is Replacing Parental Responsibility

“All I see is the dystopian Brave New future that are projections of our simplistic mechanistic leaders, which makes sense, given their godfather is Karl Marx, a determinist who has bred many of his kind after his image.”
By
by Dr Stephen FysonDec 12, 2025
When the State Becomes Co-Parent: Australia’s Intrusion into Family Life

When the State Becomes Co-Parent: Australia’s Intrusion into Family Life

"As the state once absorbed the moral and spiritual leadership of the Church over society, so too can it absorb the moral and spiritual authority of parents over their children."
By
by Staff WriterDec 11, 2025
Tarantino Ranks ‘The Passion of the Christ’ Among the Best Films of the Century

Tarantino Ranks ‘The Passion of the Christ’ Among the Best Films of the Century

“I think it actually is one of the most brilliant visual storytelling films ever made,” he said.
By
by Rod LampardDec 11, 2025
Truth Tax: Senate Dissenters Reject Albo’s FOI Amendments as a “Hubris-Driven Attack on Transparency”

Truth Tax: Senate Dissenters Reject Albo’s FOI Amendments as a “Hubris-Driven Attack on Transparency”

"The consensus from dissenters seems to be that this bill further distances the Australian government from the people its representatives are elected to serve."
By
by Rod LampardDec 10, 2025
Speech Rejected, Promiscuity Approved

Speech Rejected, Promiscuity Approved

"The question arises, while Candace Owens' verbalising conservative values is not in our nation's interest, Lily Philips' sleeping around with Australian men is?"
By
by Selah CampisiDec 9, 2025
Archbishop Warns Agenda 2030 Activists Have Infiltrated Western Governments

Archbishop Warns Agenda 2030 Activists Have Infiltrated Western Governments

“A dangerous subversive elite has managed to infiltrate at the highest levels of Western institutions and governments," he warned.
By
by Rod LampardDec 8, 2025

Image

Support

If you value our work and would like to support us, you can do so by visiting our support page. Can’t find what you’re looking for? Visit our search page.

Copyright © 2025, Caldron Pool

Permissions

Everything published at Caldron Pool is protected by copyright and cannot be used and/or duplicated without prior written permission. Links and excerpts with full attribution are permitted. Published articles represent the opinions of the author and may not reflect the views of all contributors at Caldron Pool.

Caldron Pool does not condone the use of violence, threats, or intimidation for political or religious purposes. We strongly advocate for peaceful, respectful, and free communication and open debate without fear of reprisal or punishment.